Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: History of Skepticism: In Search of Consistency

Series edited by ,
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 56,04 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

This book reconstructs the history of skepticism ranging from ancient to contemporary times, from Pyrrho to Kripke. The main skeptical stances and the historical reconstruction of the concept of skepticism are connected with an analysis of their recurrent inconsistency. The author reveals that this inconsistency is not a logical contradiction but a pragmatic one. She shows that it is a contradiction between the content of the skeptical position and the implicit presumption of the act of its assertion. The thesis of global skepticism cannot be accepted as true without falling into the pragmatic inconsistency. The author explains, how skepticism was important for exposing the limits of human knowledge and inspired its development.



This book reconstructs the history of skepticism ranging from ancient to contemporary times. The main skeptical stances and the historical reconstruction of the concept of skepticism are connected with an analysis of their recurrent inconsistency. The author reveals that this inconsistency is not a logical contradiction but a pragmatic one.

Introduction 9(4)
Chapter I The Notion and Types of Skepticism
13(14)
1 Genealogy of the Term Skepticism
13(3)
2 Evolution of the Idea of Skepticism
16(5)
2.1 Ancient Skepticism: the Suspension of Judgements Aspiring to be the Truth
16(1)
2.2 Medieval skepticism: the Weakness of Human Judgements Contrasted with God's Omnipotence
17(1)
2.3 Modern Skepticism: Doubting the Value of Judgements Aspiring to be Knowledge
18(1)
2.4 Contemporary Skepticism: Paradoxical Thesis on the Non-existence of Knowledge and Meaning
19(2)
3 Types of Skepticism and Related Terminology
21(6)
Chapter II Ancient Skepticism
27(84)
1 Elements of Skepticism in the Pre-Pyrrhonian Philosophy
27(4)
2 Pyrrho of Elis and Ethical Skepticism
31(12)
3 Academic Skepticism (Arcesilaus and Carneades)
43(13)
4 Later Pyrrhonism (Aenesidemus and Agrippa)
56(10)
5 Sextus Empiricus -- Summa of Ancient Skepticism
66(45)
5.1 The Concept and the Criterion of Truth
68(5)
5.2 Signs and Demonstrations
73(8)
5.3 Physics, Ethics and the Specialized Sciences
81(8)
5.4 The Defense of Consistency
89(2)
5.5 Recent Consistency Interpretations
91(9)
5.6 "Throwing away the Ladder" -- Does Sextus Accept Self-Refutation?
100(3)
5.7 Pragmatic Inconsistency of Sextan Skepticism
103(5)
Conclusions for Ancient Skepticism
108(3)
Chapter III Christian Reception of Ancient Skepticism and Medieval Skepticism
111(26)
1 The Early Christian Thinkers about Skepticism
111(3)
2 St. Augustine and the Critique of Academic Skepticism
114(5)
3 Medieval Skeptics before William Ockham (John of Salisbury, Henry of Ghent, Peter Aureoli)
119(7)
4 William Ockham -- Skepticism and Fideism
126(4)
5 Ockham's Followers and Skepticism based on Divine Omnipotence
130(7)
5.1 Nicholas of Autrecourt
130(3)
5.2 John of Mirecourt
133(2)
Conclusions for Medieval Skepticism
135(2)
Chapter IV Modern Skepticism
137(70)
1 The Beginning of Modern Skepticism (Erasmus, Pico, Sanchez)
137(5)
2 Montaigne's Skepticism
142(15)
2.1 Ancient Themes
143(5)
2.2 Christian Themes
148(3)
2.3 Renaissance Themes
151(2)
2.4 An Attempt to Avoid the Inconsistency Charge
153(2)
2.5 Montaigne's Followers (Charron, de la Mothe le Vayer)
155(2)
3 Descartes' Hypotheses and the Radicalization of Skepticism
157(20)
3.1 The Dream Hypothesis and the Evil Demon Hypothesis
158(3)
3.2 Idealism and Making Skepticism Deeper
161(2)
3.3 Methodic Skepticism
163(2)
3.4 An Attempt to Rebut Skeptical Hypotheses
165(6)
3.5 Skepticism between Descartes and Hume (Huet, Pascal, Bayle)
171(6)
4 Hume and Searching for Skepticism Consistency
177(16)
4.1 References to Ancient Tradition
177(3)
4.2 Acceptance of the Cartesian Hypotheses
180(2)
4.3 Broadening the Skeptical Arguments
182(4)
4.4 Instinct as a Rescue from Skepticism
186(1)
4.5 The Critique of Total Skepticism
187(2)
4.6 Searching for a Consistent Moderate Skepticism
189(1)
4.7 Dialectics of Skepticism and Naturalism
190(3)
5 Kant's Transcendental Skepticism and its Continuations
193(14)
5.1 Kant and the Skeptical Tradition
193(2)
5.2 Futility of Skepticism and the Value of the Skeptical Method
195(1)
5.3 Transcendental Skepticism
196(3)
5.4 Hegel about Skepticism
199(2)
5.5 Nietzsche's Skepticism
201(4)
Conclusions for Modern Skepticism
205(2)
Chapter V Contemporary Skepticism
207(66)
1 The Problem of Skepticism and the Change of the Concept of Knowledge at the Beginning of the 20th Century
207(17)
1.1 Pragmatism
207(6)
1.2 Analytical Philosophy
213(8)
1.3 Phenomenology and Existentialism
221(3)
2 Peter Unger and Contemporary Cartesian Skepticism
224(9)
2.1 Knowledge as an Absolute Limit Term
224(4)
2.2 Hypothesis of the Evil Scientist and Brain-in-a-Vat
228(2)
2.3 Other Protagonists of Skepticism
230(3)
3 The Discussion with the Cartesian Skepticism
233(19)
3.1 Knowledge Does Not Require Certainty (Fallibilism)
233(2)
3.2 Knowledge is Not Governed by Deductive Rules (Nozick)
235(2)
3.3 Knowledge Does not Require Knowledge about Knowledge (Externalism)
237(1)
3.4 Standards for Knowledge are Changeable (Contextualism)
238(6)
3.5 Justification Does Not Require the Procedure of Justification (Williams)
244(5)
3.6 Inconsistency of Brain-in-a-Vat Hypothesis (Putnam)
249(3)
4 Meaning Skepticism by Kripke-Wittgenstein
252(11)
4.1 Thought Experiment with quus
252(3)
4.2 Practice as a Rescue from Skepticism
255(3)
4.3 Meaning Skepticism about Other Minds
258(2)
4.4 Skepticism about Self-Consciousness
260(3)
Conclusions for Contemporary Skepticism
263(4)
Conclusion: Pragmatic Inconsistency of Skepticism
267(6)
Bibliography 273(22)
Chronology and Geography of Skepticism 295(2)
Index 297
Renata Ziemiska is professor of philosophy and chair in epistemology at the University of Szczecin, Poland. She is member of The Committee on Philosophical Sciences of the Polish Academy of Sciences, member of Society for Skeptical Studies and International Society for the Study of Skepticism.