List of contributors |
|
xiii | |
Foreword |
|
xvii | |
Preface |
|
xx | |
About the companion website |
|
xxii | |
The Scenarios |
|
xxiiii | |
Section 1 Starting your dissertation journey |
|
1 | (56) |
|
1 Starting the journey of your final-year project |
|
|
3 | (11) |
|
|
What is a final-year project? |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
Why do nurses need to do a research-based project? |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Undergraduate versus postgraduate projects |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
What are the features of a degree education? |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
Features of a final-year project |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
Planning your final-year project: essential considerations |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
Completing your final-year project and gaining a good classification |
|
|
11 | (2) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
2 Introduction to writing your evidence-based practice dissertation/project |
|
|
14 | (10) |
|
|
|
Sample guidelines for students undertaking a nursing associate project, an undergraduate healthcare project/dissertation or a master's degree project |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
Typical learning outcomes for a nursing associate course 2000-word literature review |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Typical learning outcomes for an undergraduate evidence-based practice dissertation/project |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Typical learning outcomes for a postgraduate evidence-based practice dissertation/project |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
The dissertation/project/assignment |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
Guidelines for students undertaking a nursing associate evidence-based practice assignment |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
Guidelines for students undertaking an undergraduate evidence-based practice final project |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
Guidelines for students undertaking an undergraduate evidence-based practice dissertation |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
Guidelines for a typical postgraduate evidence-based practice dissertation/project module learning outcomes |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
3 Clinical effectiveness and evidence-based practice: background and history |
|
|
24 | (7) |
|
|
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
Historical aspects of evidence-based practice |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
The contribution of the nursing profession to evidence-based practice |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
4 What is evidence-based practice and clinical effectiveness? |
|
|
31 | (12) |
|
|
|
31 | (4) |
|
|
35 | (3) |
|
Making care more effective |
|
|
38 | (5) |
|
5 The challenges of delivering practice based on best evidence (in primary, secondary and tertiary settings) |
|
|
43 | (14) |
|
|
An evidence base for practice |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
Barriers to the use of research evidence in practice |
|
|
45 | (3) |
|
Encouraging the use of research evidence in practice |
|
|
48 | (5) |
|
|
53 | (4) |
Section 2 Sourcing and accessing evidence for your dissertation |
|
57 | (40) |
|
6 Sourcing the best evidence |
|
|
59 | (21) |
|
|
|
Exploring and refining your question |
|
|
59 | (3) |
|
Searching for research articles |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
Devising your search strategy |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
Accessing journal literature |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (4) |
|
Websites and other resources |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
Support from your library service |
|
|
75 | (3) |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
7 What is grey literature and where can it be found? |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
|
|
What is 'grey literature'? |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Where can I find grey literature? |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
What about Google scholar? |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
8 Harvard or Vancouver: getting it right all the time |
|
|
83 | (6) |
|
|
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Use of computer referencing packages |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
9 Posing an evidence-based practice question: using the PICO and SPICE models |
|
|
89 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
Examples of PICO formulated questions |
|
|
91 | (3) |
|
|
94 | (3) |
Section 3 Developing your healthcare/evidence-based practice dissertation |
|
97 | (24) |
|
10 Managing your time wisely |
|
|
99 | (7) |
|
|
|
An evidence-based practice healthcare dissertation/final project or evidence-informed decision-making assignment as a frame of mind |
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
|
104 | (2) |
|
11 Developing your study skills |
|
|
106 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
Organising things in terms of what goes where |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
Consolidating your ideas and activities by talking to others about it |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
12 Getting the most from your personal tutor |
|
|
114 | (7) |
|
|
Before approaching your academic support |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Agreeing a working pattern |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Anticipating and preventing problems |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Good planning is the essence |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
Supervision at a distance |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
|
118 | (3) |
Section 4 Preparing to use research evidence in your dissertation |
|
121 | (54) |
|
13 Clinical standards, audit and inspection |
|
|
123 | (23) |
|
|
|
What is healthcare governance? |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
What are the seven pillars of clinical governance? Are they still relevant in contemporary practice? |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
The role of the Care Quality Commission |
|
|
127 | (5) |
|
|
132 | (4) |
|
Developing audit tools to measure compliance to policy standards |
|
|
136 | (3) |
|
|
139 | (4) |
|
Responding to an adverse incident |
|
|
143 | (3) |
|
14 Understanding quantitative research |
|
|
146 | (10) |
|
|
|
Is it a quantitative study? |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
|
148 | (1) |
|
Types of quantitative studies |
|
|
148 | (3) |
|
Key elements in a quantitative study |
|
|
151 | (3) |
|
Strengths of quantitative studies |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (1) |
|
|
154 | (2) |
|
15 Understanding qualitative research |
|
|
156 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Types of qualitative studies |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
Key elements in a qualitative study |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
Strengths of qualitative studies |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
16 Using historical literature |
|
|
164 | (11) |
|
|
|
What is the use of history in a world focused on scientific evidence? |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
Where does historical research fit methodologically? |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
Would such a study constitute primary research or would it be possible to appraise historical research that others had done? |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
Could I possibly justify doing a historical evidence-based practice project? |
|
|
168 | (1) |
|
How do I go about undertaking a study based on historical evidence? |
|
|
168 | (7) |
Section 5 Critically appraising evidence |
|
175 | (56) |
|
17 Selecting and using appraisal tools: how to interrogate research papers |
|
|
177 | (22) |
|
|
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
What is critical appraisal? What are critical appraisal tools? Why is critical appraisal of published research important? What does critical appraisal mean to nurses and other healthcare professionals? |
|
|
178 | (1) |
|
What is the best critical appraisal tool to use? |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
Is an individual paper worth adding to the shortlist? Preparing your initial long shortlist |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
Commencing your initial read and review of an empirical journal paper |
|
|
181 | (2) |
|
Points to consider about the paper(s) before using any critiquing tool |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
Applying a critiquing framework tool of your choice to your selected papers |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
|
187 | (9) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
18 Critically reviewing qualitative papers using a CASP critiquing tool |
|
|
199 | (8) |
|
|
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
The CASP qualitative questions |
|
|
201 | (3) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
The value of the research |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
19 Critically reviewing quantitative papers using a CASP critiquing tool |
|
|
207 | (10) |
|
|
|
Question 1 'Did the study ask a clearly focused question?' |
|
|
208 | (1) |
|
Question 2 'Was this a randomised controlled trial and was it appropriately so?' |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
Question 3 'Were participants appropriately allocated to intervention and control groups?' |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
Question 4 'Were participants, staff and study personnel "blind" to participants study group?' |
|
|
211 | (2) |
|
Question 5 'Were all the participants who entered the trial accounted for at its conclusion?' |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
Question 6 'Were the participants in all groups followed up and data collected in the same way?' |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
Question 7 'Did the study have enough participants to minimise the play of chance?' |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
Question 8 'How are the results presented and what is the main result?' |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
Question 9 'How precise are these results?' |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
Question 10 'Were all important outcomes considered so the results can be applied?' |
|
|
215 | (2) |
|
20 Critically reviewing a journal paper using the Parahoo model |
|
|
217 | (14) |
|
|
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (10) |
|
|
228 | (3) |
Section 6 Taking your dissertation further: disseminating evidence, knowledge transfer; writing as a professional skill |
|
231 | (34) |
|
21 Publishing your work or making a conference or poster presentation |
|
|
233 | (15) |
|
|
|
Your dissertation or final assignment is complete: what next? |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
Conference poster or abstract and presentation at a conference |
|
|
235 | (6) |
|
Writing a paper for publication |
|
|
241 | (6) |
|
What will you do with your evidence-based practice healthcare dissertation/final project or evidence-informed decision-making assignment? |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
22 Reflecting on your evidence-based practice healthcare dissertation/final project or evidence-informed decision-making assignment journey |
|
|
248 | (10) |
|
|
|
248 | (2) |
|
Frameworks for reflection |
|
|
250 | (6) |
|
Some final points on reflection |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
|
257 | (1) |
|
23 Building the architecture of your dissertation |
|
|
258 | (7) |
|
|
|
Writing your evidence-based practice healthcare dissertation/final project or evidence-informed decision-making assignment |
|
|
258 | (7) |
Section 7 Bonus chapters (website only) |
|
265 | (2) |
|
24 Public health: writing a master's level dissertation |
|
|
|
|
25 Critically reviewing a journal paper using the Rees model |
|
|
|
|
|
26 Managing a learning difference |
|
|
|
|
27 Research governance in practice |
|
|
|
|
28 Using evidence in practice |
|
|
Index |
|
267 | |