The climate crisis has forced us to recognize that we are not separate from nature but are part of the natural world on which we depend: human beings are animals and we must understand much better our place in nature and our impact on our environment if we are to avoid our own annihilation as a species. And yet we feel nevertheless that we do not entirely fit into nature, that we stand apart from other animals in some way in what way, exactly?
Markus Gabriel argues that what distinguishes humans from other animals is that humans are minded living beings who seek to understand the world and themselves and who possess ethical insight into moral contexts. Mind is the capacity to lead ones life in the light of a conception of who or what one is. The undeniable difference between us and other animals defines the human condition and places a special responsibility on us to consider our actions in the context of other living beings and our shared habitat. It also calls on us to cultivate an ethics of not-knowing: to recognize that, however much we may seek to understand the world, we will never completely master it. Our grasp of reality, mediated by our animal minds, will always be limited: much is and will remain alien to us, lending itself only to speculation and to remember this is to stand us in better stead for carving out an existence among the environmental crisis that looms before us all.
Recenzijas
"The unstoppable Markus Gabriel is back in action, this time tackling the status of humans with respect to animals. This book offers a powerful critique of naturalism and scientism while mounting an original defence of the centrality of human being amidst the brewing ecological crisis. No philosopher today writes more clearly than Gabriel." Graham Harman, Southern California Institute of Architecture
"The Human Animal is an epoch-making book to radically transform our social imaginary in which we project human animality onto the animal and marginalize it in an unethical way. This transformation of our social imaginary comes from the New Enlightenment. It asks us a new way of being ethical insofar as we are human." Takahiro Nakajima, The University of Tokyo
Introduction
First Part: We and the Other Animals
The Logical Animal How Humans Became Animals The Specific Something
Nature is not a Safari The Anthropocene as Hybris The Network: Plants,
Bats, Fungi Continuity, Discontinuity, or Somehow Both? Shadowboxing
What Does it Actually Mean to Understand Oneself as an Animal? Why We are
Not Amphibians The Animal Word: Why the Zoo does not Exist Animalism, The
Prestige, and The Anomaly The Human Animal as Machine? Animals Like Us?
Korsgaards Values Alice Crary Inside Ethics Subjectivity and
Objectivity Why We Arent Strangers in Nature The New Enlightenment in
the Age of Living Beings Kants Four Questions Being Human is an Answer
to a Question The Human Being as the Animal Who Doesnt Want to Be One
Second Part
Social Freedom and the Meaning of Life
The Basic Idea of Liberal Pluralism The History of Life The Idea of
Life To Live and to Survive The Basic Form of Human Society Do We Want
to Live Forever? The Meaning in Life The Meaning of Life [ pg. ] is Not
Nonsense Nonsense is Sense-deprivation Limits of Liberal Pluralism? Who
We Are and Who We Want to Be Radical Autonomy and the New Enlightenment
Social Freedom and the Meaning of Life Why Science Has Not Discovered that
Life Has No Meaning From Mind Back to Nature
Third Part
Towards an Ethics of Not-Knowing
Nature, Environment, Universe In-itself and For-itself Is Science
Fiction? Limits of Scientific Knowledge Otherness Towards an Ecological
Ethics Under-complex, Complex, Hyper-complex Homo sapiens, Or, The Wise
Words of Socrates Opinions, Knowledge, and the Idea of the Good Moral
Reality and Ethical Facts Not-knowing Towards An Ethics of Not-knowing
Acknowledgments
Glossary
Notes
Index
Markus Gabriel holds the chair for Epistemology, Modern and Contemporary Philosophy at the University of Bonn and is also the Director of the International Center for Philosophy in Bonn.
