Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Indicators for Monitoring Undergraduate STEM Education

  • Formāts: 244 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Mar-2018
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309467896
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 3,93 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 244 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Mar-2018
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309467896
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) professionals generate a stream of scientific discoveries and technological innovations that fuel job creation and national economic growth. Ensuring a robust supply of these professionals is critical for sustaining growth and creating jobs growth at a time of intense global competition. Undergraduate STEM education prepares the STEM professionals of today and those of tomorrow, while also helping all students develop knowledge and skills they can draw on in a variety of occupations and as individual citizens. However, many capable students intending to major in STEM later switch to another field or drop out of higher education altogether, partly because of documented weaknesses in STEM teaching, learning and student supports. Improving undergraduate STEM education to address these weaknesses is a national imperative.





Many initiatives are now underway to improve the quality of undergraduate STEM teaching and learning. Some focus on the national level, others involve multi-institution collaborations, and others take place on individual campuses. At present, however, policymakers and the public do not know whether these various initiatives are accomplishing their goals and leading to nationwide improvement in undergraduate STEM education.





Indicators for Monitoring Undergraduate STEM Education outlines a framework and a set of indicators that document the status and quality of undergraduate STEM education at the national level over multiple years. It also indicates areas where additional research is needed in order to develop appropriate measures. This publication will be valuable to government agencies that make investments in higher education, institutions of higher education, private funders of higher education programs, and industry stakeholders. It will also be of interest to researchers who study higher education.

Table of Contents



Front Matter Summary 1 Introduction 2 Conceptual Framework for the Indicator System 3 Goal 1: Increase Students' Mastery of STEM Concepts and Skills 4 Goal 2: Strive for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion 5 Goal 3: Ensure Adequate Numbers of STEM Professionals 6 Existing Data Sources and Monitoring Systems 7 Implementing the Indicator System Appendix A: Public Comments on Draft Report and Committee Response Appendix B: Possible Formulas for Calculating Selected Indicators Appendix C: Agendas: Workshop and Public Comment Meeting Appendix D: Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff
Summary 1(12)
1 Introduction
13(24)
Interpreting the Study Charge
15(7)
Vision
15(3)
A Focus on the National Level
18(1)
Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
19(1)
Goals and Objectives
20(1)
Measures and Indicators
20(2)
Undergraduate STEM Education
22(1)
Evidence-Based STEM Educational Practices and Programs
22(1)
Measuring College Quality in an Era of Accountability
22(9)
Employment Outcomes
23(2)
The STEM Workforce
25(2)
Learning Outcomes
27(3)
Goals of the Indicator System
30(1)
Study Approach and Organization of the Report
31(1)
References
32(5)
2 Conceptual Framework For the Indicator System
37(18)
A Systems View of Higher Education
38(2)
Goals for Undergraduate STEM Education
40(3)
Goal 1 Increase Students' Mastery of STEM Concepts and Skills
42(1)
Goal 2 Strive for Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
43(1)
Goal 3 Ensure Adequate Numbers of STEM Professionals
43(1)
Articulating Goals as Objectives
44(3)
The Federal STEM Education Strategic Plan
44(1)
Criteria for Identifying Objectives
45(1)
The Objectives
46(1)
Proposed Indicators
47(1)
Conclusion
47(3)
References
50(5)
3 Goal 1: Increase Students' Mastery of Stem Concepts and Skills
55(32)
Objective 1.1 Use of Evidence-Based Educational Practices Both In and Outside of Classrooms
57(10)
Importance of the Objective
57(9)
Proposed Indicators
66(1)
Objective 1.2 Existence and Use of Supports that Help STEM Instructors Use Evidence-Based Educational Practices
67(4)
Importance of the Objective
67(2)
Proposed Indicators
69(2)
Objective 1.3 An Institutional Culture that Values Undergraduate STEM Instruction
71(4)
Importance of the Objective
71(2)
Proposed Indicators
73(2)
Objective 1.4 Continuous Improvement in STEM Teaching and Learning
75(4)
Importance of the Objective
75(2)
Challenges of Measuring Continuous Improvement
77(2)
References
79(8)
4 Goal 2: Strive For Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion
87(24)
Objective 2.1 Equity of Access to High-Quality Undergraduate STEM Educational Programs and Experiences
90(5)
Importance of the Objective
90(1)
Proposed Indicators
91(4)
Objective 2.2 Representational Diversity among STEM Credential Earners
95(5)
Importance of the Objective
95(1)
Proposed Indicators
96(4)
Objective 2.3 Representational Diversity among STEM Instructors
100(2)
Importance of the Objective
100(1)
Proposed Indicators
100(2)
Objective 2.4 Inclusive Environments in Institutions and STEM Departments
102(2)
Importance of the Objective
102(1)
Proposed Indicators
103(1)
References
104(7)
5 Goal 3: Ensure Adequate Numbers of Stem Professionals
111(16)
Objective 3.1 Adequate Foundational Preparation for STEM for all Students
112(4)
Importance of the Objective
112(3)
Proposed Indicator
115(1)
Objective 3.2 Successful Navigation into and through STEM Programs of Study
116(5)
Importance of the Objective
116(3)
Proposed Indicators
119(2)
Objective 3.3 STEM Credential Attainment
121(1)
Importance of the Objective
121(1)
Proposed Indicator
121(1)
References
122(5)
6 Existing Data Sources and Monitoring Systems
127(50)
Overview
127(5)
Public Data Sources
132(7)
The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System
132(3)
The Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study
135(1)
The National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty
136(1)
National Student Loan Data System
136(2)
State Unit Record Data Systems
138(1)
Proprietary Data Sources
139(5)
National Student Clearinghouse
139(1)
Higher Education Research Institute Surveys
140(3)
National Survey of Student Engagement
143(1)
Community College Survey of Student Engagement
144(1)
Faculty Survey of Student Engagement
144(1)
Monitoring Systems
144(4)
Science and Engineering Indicators
144(2)
Proprietary Monitoring Systems
146(2)
Data for Each Indicator
148(1)
Indicator 1.1.1 Use of Evidence-Based STEM Educational Practices in Course Development and Delivery
148(8)
Indicator 1.1.2 Use of Evidence-Based STEM Practices Outside the Classroom
156(1)
Indicator 1.2.1 Extent of Instructors' Involvement in Professional Development
157(1)
Indicator 1.2.2 Availability of Support or Incentives for Evidence-Based Course Development or Course Redesign
157(1)
Indicator 1.3.1 Use of Valid Measures of Teaching Effectiveness
158(1)
Indicator 1.3.2 Consideration of Evidence-Based Teaching in Personnel Decisions by Departments and Institutions
159(1)
Indicator 2.1.1 Institutional Structures, Policies, and Practices That Strengthen STEM Readiness for Entering and Enrolled College Students
159(1)
Indicator 2.1.2 Entrance to and Persistence in STEM Academic Programs
160(1)
Indicator 2.1.3 Equitable Student Participation in Evidence-Based STEM Educational Programs and Experiences
161(1)
Indicator 2.2.1 Diversity of STEM Degree and Certificate Earners in Comparison with Diversity of Degree and Certificate Earners in All Fields
162(1)
Indicator 2.2.2 Diversity of Students Transferring from 2-Year to 4-Year STEM Programs in Comparison with Diversity of Students in 2-Year STEM Programs
162(1)
Indicator 2.2.3 Time-to-Degree for Students in STEM Academic Programs
163(1)
Indicator 2.3.1 Diversity of STEM Instructors in Comparison with the Diversity of STEM Graduate Degree Holders
164(1)
Indicator 2.3.2 Diversity of STEM Graduate Student Instructors in Comparison with the Diversity of STEM Graduate Students
164(1)
Indicator 2.4.1 Students Pursuing STEM Credentials Feel Included and Supported in Their Academic Programs and Departments
164(1)
Indicator 2.4.2 Instructors Teaching Courses in STEM Disciplines Feel Included and Supported in Their Departments
164(2)
Indicator 2.4.3 Institutional Practices Are Culturally Responsive, Inclusive, and Consistent across the Institution
166(1)
Indicator 3.1.1 Completion of Foundational Courses, Including Developmental Education Courses, to Ensure STEM Program Readiness
166(1)
Indicator 3.2.1 Retention in STEM Degree or Certificate Programs, Course to Course and Year to Year
167(2)
Indicator 3.2.2 Transfers from 2-Year to 4-Year STEM Programs in Comparison with Transfers to All 4-Year Programs
169(1)
Indicator 3.3.1 Percentage of Students Who Attain STEM Credentials over Time, Disaggregated by Institution Type, Transfer Status, and Demographic Characteristics
169(1)
Summary and Conclusions
170(2)
References
172(5)
7 Implementing the Indicator System
177(24)
Option 1 Create a National Student Unit Record Data System
177(7)
Option 2 Expand NCES Data Collections
184(8)
Expanding IPEDS
187(3)
Expanding the Beginning Postsecondary Students Longitudinal Study
190(1)
Renewing and Expanding the National Study of Postsecondary Faculty
191(1)
Option 3 Combine Existing Data from Nonfederal Sources
192(7)
Conclusions
196(1)
Research, Evaluation, and Updating of the Proposed Indicator System
197(1)
A Note of Caution
198(1)
References
199(2)
APPENDIXES
A Public Comments on Draft Report and Committee Response
201(8)
B Possible Formulas for Calculating Selected Indicators
209(6)
C Agendas: Workshop and Public Comment Meeting
215(6)
D Biographical Sketches of Committee Members and Staff
221