Preface |
|
xvii | |
Author |
|
xxi | |
1 Introduction |
|
1 | (46) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 Key Statistical Concepts |
|
|
2 | (20) |
|
1.2.1 Confounding and Interaction |
|
|
2 | (6) |
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
1.2.2 Hypotheses Testing and p-values |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
1.2.2.1 Hypotheses Testing |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
1.2.3 One-Sided versus Two-Sided Hypotheses |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
1.2.4 Clinical Significance and Clinical Equivalence |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
1.2.5 Reproducibility and Generalizability |
|
|
17 | (5) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
1.3 Complex Innovative Designs |
|
|
22 | (5) |
|
1.3.1 Adaptive Trial Design |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
1.3.1.2 Types of Adaptive Design |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
1.3.2 The n-of-1 Trial Design |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
1.3.2.1 Complete n-of-1 Trial Design |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
1.3.2.2 Merits and Limitations |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
1.3.3 The Concept of Master Protocols |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
1.4 Practical, Challenging, and Controversial Issues |
|
|
27 | (16) |
|
1.4.1 Totality-of-the-Evidence |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
1.4.2 (1-α) CI for New Drugs versus (1-2α) CI for Generics/Biosimilars |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
1.4.4 Criteria for Decision-Making at Interim |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
1.4.5 Non-inferiority or Equivalence/Similarity Margin Selection |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
1.4.6 Treatment of Missing Data |
|
|
32 | (4) |
|
1.4.7 Sample Size Requirement |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
1.4.10 Drug Products with Multiple Components |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
1.4.11 Advisory Committee |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
1.4.12 Recent FDA Critical Clinical Initiatives |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
1.5 Aim and Scope of the Book |
|
|
43 | (4) |
2 Totality-of-the-Evidence |
|
47 | (18) |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
2.3 Totality-of-the-Evidence |
|
|
49 | (5) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
2.3.2 Fundamental Biosimilarity Assumptions |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Examples-Recent Biosimilar Regulatory Submissions |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
2.4 Practical Issues and Challenges |
|
|
54 | (5) |
|
2.4.1 Link among Analytical Similarity, PK/PD Similarity, and Clinical Similarity |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
2.4.2 Totality-of-the-Evidence versus Substantial Evidence |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
2.4.3 Same Regulatory Standards |
|
|
58 | (1) |
|
2.5 Development of Totality-of-the-Evidence |
|
|
59 | (4) |
|
|
63 | (2) |
3 Hypotheses Testing versus Confidence Interval |
|
65 | (28) |
|
|
65 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
3.2.1 Point Hypotheses Testing |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Interval Hypotheses Testing |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Probability of Inconclusiveness |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
3.3 Confidence Interval Approach |
|
|
69 | (7) |
|
3.3.1 Confidence Interval Approach with Single Reference |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Confidence Interval Approach with Multiple References |
|
|
70 | (6) |
|
3.3.2.1 Pairwise Comparisons |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.3.2.2 Simultaneous Confidence Interval |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
3.3.2.3 Example 1 (False Negative) |
|
|
71 | (1) |
|
3.3.2.4 Example 2 (False Positive) |
|
|
72 | (4) |
|
3.4 Two One-Sided Tests versus Confidence Interval Approach |
|
|
76 | (5) |
|
3.4.1 Two One-Sided Tests (TOST) Procedure |
|
|
76 | (2) |
|
3.4.2 Confidence Interval Approach |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
3.4.2.1 Level 1 - α versus Level 1 - 2α |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
3.4.2.2 Significance Level versus Size |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
3.4.2.3 Sizes of Tests Related to Different Confidence Intervals |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (8) |
|
3.5.1 Performance Characteristics |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
|
82 | (4) |
|
3.5.3 An Example-Binary Responses |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
3.6 Sample Size Requirement |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (2) |
4 Endpoint Selection |
|
93 | (30) |
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
4.2 Clinical Strategy for Endpoint Selection |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
4.3 Translations among Clinical Endpoints |
|
|
96 | (3) |
|
4.4 Comparison of Different Clinical Strategies |
|
|
99 | (11) |
|
4.4.1 Test Statistics, Power and Sample Size Determination |
|
|
99 | (3) |
|
4.4.2 Determination of the Non-inferiority Margin |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (8) |
|
4.4.3.1 Absolute Difference versus Relative Difference |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
4.4.3.2 Responders' Rate Based on Absolute Difference |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
4.4.3.3 Responders' Rate Based on Relative Difference |
|
|
103 | (7) |
|
4.5 Development of Therapeutic Index Function |
|
|
110 | (11) |
|
|
110 | (4) |
|
4.5.2 Therapeutic Index Function |
|
|
114 | (10) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
4.5.2.2 Determination of fi(·) and the Distribution of e |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
4.5.2.3 Derivation of Pr(I,|ej) and Pr(ej|Ii) |
|
|
115 | (6) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
5 Non-inferiority/Equivalence Margin |
|
123 | (30) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
5.2 Non-inferiority versus Equivalence |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
5.2.1 Relationship among Non-inferiority, Equivalence, and Superiority |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Impact on Sample Size Requirement |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
5.3 Non-inferiority Hypothesis |
|
|
127 | (3) |
|
5.3.1 Regulatory Requirements |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Hypothesis Setting and Clinically Meaningful Margin |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
5.3.3 Retention of Treatment Effect in the Absence of Placebo |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
5.4 Methods for Selection of Non-inferiority Margin |
|
|
130 | (5) |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
5.4.2 FDA's Recommendations |
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
5.4.3 Chow and Shao's Method |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
5.4.4 Alternative Methods |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
5.5 Strategy for Margin Selection |
|
|
135 | (16) |
|
5.5.1 Criteria for Risk Assessment |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
5.5.2 Risk Assessment with Continuous Endpoints |
|
|
138 | (5) |
|
|
143 | (6) |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
|
151 | (2) |
6 Missing Data |
|
153 | (26) |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
6.2 Missing Data Imputation |
|
|
155 | (4) |
|
6.2.1 Last Observation Carried Forward |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
6.2.1.1 Bias-variance Trade-off |
|
|
156 | (1) |
|
6.2.1.2 Hypothesis Testing |
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Mean/Median Imputation |
|
|
158 | (1) |
|
6.2.3 Regression Imputation |
|
|
159 | (1) |
|
6.3 Marginal/Conditional Imputation for Contingency |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
6.3.1 Simple Random Sampling |
|
|
160 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Goodness-of-Fit Test |
|
|
161 | (1) |
|
6.4 Test for Independence |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
6.4.1 Results Under Stratified Simple Random Sampling |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 When Number of Strata Is Large |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (12) |
|
6.5.1 Other Methods for Missing Data |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
6.5.2 The Use of Estimand in Missing Data |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
6.5.3 Statistical Methods Under Incomplete Data Structure |
|
|
166 | (14) |
|
|
166 | (2) |
|
6.5.3.2 Statistical Methods for 2 x 3 Crossover Designs with Incomplete Data |
|
|
168 | (4) |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
|
174 | (2) |
|
|
176 | (3) |
7 Multiplicity |
|
179 | (16) |
|
|
179 | (1) |
|
7.2 Regulatory Perspective and Controversial Issues |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
7.2.1 Regulatory Perspectives |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 Controversial Issues |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
7.3 Statistical Method for Adjustment of Multiplicity |
|
|
182 | (5) |
|
|
183 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Tukey's Multiple Range Testing Procedure |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
7.3.4 Closed Testing Procedure |
|
|
185 | (1) |
|
|
186 | (1) |
|
7.4 Gate-Keeping Procedures |
|
|
187 | (5) |
|
|
187 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Gate-Keeping Testing Procedures |
|
|
188 | (4) |
|
|
192 | (3) |
8 Sample Size |
|
195 | (24) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
8.2 Traditional Sample Size Calculation |
|
|
196 | (4) |
|
8.3 Selection of Study Endpoints |
|
|
200 | (5) |
|
8.3.1 Translations among Clinical Endpoints |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
8.3.2 Comparison of Different Clinical Strategies |
|
|
202 | (3) |
|
8.4 Multiple-stage Adaptive Designs |
|
|
205 | (3) |
|
8.5 Sample Size Adjustment with Protocol Amendments |
|
|
208 | (3) |
|
8.6 Multi-regional Clinical Trials |
|
|
211 | (3) |
|
|
214 | (3) |
|
8.7.1 Is Power Calculation the Only Way? |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
8.7.2 Instability of Sample Size |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
8.7.3 Sample Size Adjustment for Protocol Amendment |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
8.7.4 Sample Size Based on Confidence Interval Approach |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
|
217 | (2) |
9 Reproducible Research |
|
219 | (22) |
|
|
219 | (1) |
|
9.2 The Concept of Reproducibility Probability |
|
|
220 | (2) |
|
9.3 The Estimated Power Approach |
|
|
222 | (6) |
|
9.3.1 Two Samples with Equal Variances |
|
|
222 | (3) |
|
9.3.2 Two Samples with Unequal Variances |
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
9.3.3 Parallel-Group Designs |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
9.4 Alternative Methods for Evaluation of Reproducibility Probability |
|
|
228 | (7) |
|
9.4.1 The Confidence Bound Approach |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
9.4.2 The Bayesian Approach |
|
|
230 | (5) |
|
|
235 | (5) |
|
9.5.1 Substantial Evidence with a Single Trial |
|
|
235 | (1) |
|
|
236 | (1) |
|
9.5.3 Generalizability between Patient Populations |
|
|
236 | (4) |
|
|
240 | (1) |
10 Extrapolation |
|
241 | (22) |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
10.2 Shift in Target Patient Population |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
10.3 Assessment of Sensitivity Index |
|
|
244 | (9) |
|
10.3.1 The Case Where epsilon Is Random and C Is Fixed |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
10.3.2 The Case Where epsilon Is Fixed and C Is Random |
|
|
247 | (3) |
|
10.3.3 The Case Where Both epsilon and C Are Random |
|
|
250 | (3) |
|
10.4 Statistical Inference |
|
|
253 | (5) |
|
10.4.1 The Case Where epsilon Is Random and C Is Fixed |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
10.4.2 The Case Where epsilon Is Fixed and C Is Random |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
10.4.3 The Case Where epsilon and C Are Random |
|
|
256 | (2) |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
10.5.1 Case 1: epsilon Is Random and C Is Fixed |
|
|
258 | (1) |
|
10.5.2 Case 2: epsilon Is Fixed and C Is Random |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
10.5.3 Case 3: epsilon and C Are Both Random |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
|
259 | (1) |
|
|
260 | (3) |
11 Consistency Evaluation |
|
263 | (30) |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
11.2 Issues in Multi-regional Clinical Trials |
|
|
264 | (2) |
|
11.2.1 Multi-center Trials |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
11.2.2 Multi-regional, Multi-center Trials |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
|
266 | (10) |
|
11.3.1 Test for Consistency |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
11.3.2 Assessment of Consistency Index |
|
|
267 | (2) |
|
11.3.3 Evaluation of Sensitivity Index |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
11.3.4 Achieving Reproducibility and/or Generalizability |
|
|
270 | (3) |
|
11.3.4.1 Specificity Reproducibility Probability for Inequality Test |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
11.3.4.2 Superiority Reproducibility Probability |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
11.3.4.3 Reproducibility Probability Ratio for Inequality Test |
|
|
272 | (1) |
|
11.3.4.4 Reproducibility Probability Ratio for Superiority Test |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
|
273 | (2) |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
11.3.7 The Applicability of Those Approaches |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
|
276 | (10) |
|
11.4.1 The Case of the Matched-Pair Parallel Design with Normal Data and Superiority Test |
|
|
276 | (5) |
|
11.4.2 The Case of the Two-Group Parallel Design with Normal Data and Superiority Test |
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
|
286 | (4) |
|
11.6 Other Considerations/Discussions |
|
|
290 | (1) |
|
|
291 | (2) |
12 Drug Products with Multiple Components-Development of TCM |
|
293 | (48) |
|
|
293 | (2) |
|
12.2 Fundamental Differences |
|
|
295 | (5) |
|
12.2.1 Medical Theory/Mechanism and Practice |
|
|
295 | (2) |
|
12.2.1.1 Medical Practice |
|
|
296 | (1) |
|
12.2.2 Techniques of Diagnosis |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
12.2.2.1 Objective versus Subjective Criteria for Evaluability |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
12.2.3.1 Single Active Ingredient versus Multiple Components |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
12.2.3.2 Fixed Dose versus Flexible Dose |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
12.3 Basic Considerations |
|
|
300 | (4) |
|
|
300 | (1) |
|
12.3.2 Validation of Quantitative Instrument |
|
|
301 | (1) |
|
|
302 | (1) |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
12.3.5 Sample Size Calculation |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
12.4 TCM Drug Development |
|
|
304 | (27) |
|
12.4.1 Statistical Quality Control Method for Assessing Consistency |
|
|
304 | (13) |
|
12.4.1.1 Acceptance Criteria |
|
|
308 | (1) |
|
|
308 | (3) |
|
12.4.1.3 Testing Procedure |
|
|
311 | (1) |
|
12.4.1.4 Strategy for Statistical Quality Control |
|
|
311 | (4) |
|
|
315 | (2) |
|
12.4.2 Stability Analysis |
|
|
317 | (6) |
|
12.4.2.1 Models and Assumptions |
|
|
319 | (1) |
|
12.4.2.2 Shelf-Life Determination |
|
|
320 | (1) |
|
|
321 | (2) |
|
|
323 | (1) |
|
12.4.3 Calibration of Study Endpoints in Clinical Development |
|
|
323 | (8) |
|
12.4.3.1 Chinese Diagnostic Procedure |
|
|
324 | (1) |
|
|
325 | (1) |
|
|
326 | (2) |
|
|
328 | (1) |
|
|
329 | (2) |
|
|
331 | (4) |
|
12.5.1 Regulatory Requirements |
|
|
331 | (1) |
|
12.5.2 Test for Consistency |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
12.5.4 Shelf-Life Estimation |
|
|
333 | (1) |
|
12.5.5 Indication and Label |
|
|
334 | (1) |
|
|
335 | (4) |
|
|
335 | (1) |
|
12.6.2 Health Index and Efficacy Measure |
|
|
336 | (1) |
|
12.6.3 Assessment of Efficacy |
|
|
336 | (3) |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
|
339 | (2) |
13 Adaptive Trial Design |
|
341 | (26) |
|
|
341 | (2) |
|
13.2 What Is Adaptive Design? |
|
|
343 | (8) |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
13.2.2 Types of Adaptive Designs |
|
|
344 | (8) |
|
13.2.2.1 Adaptive Randomization Design |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.2 Group Sequential Design |
|
|
345 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.3 Flexible Sample Size Re-estimation (SSRE) Design |
|
|
346 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.4 Drop-the-Losers Design |
|
|
346 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.5 Adaptive Dose Finding Design |
|
|
347 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.6 Biomarker-Adaptive Design |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.7 Adaptive Treatment-Switching Design |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.8 Adaptive-Hypotheses Design |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.9 Seamless Adaptive Trial Design |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
13.2.2.10 Multiple Adaptive Design |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
13.3 Regulatory/Statistical Perspectives |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
13.4 Impact, Challenges, and Obstacles |
|
|
352 | (2) |
|
13.4.1 Impact of Protocol Amendments |
|
|
352 | (1) |
|
13.4.2 Challenges in By Design Adaptations |
|
|
352 | (2) |
|
13.4.3 Obstacles of Retrospective Adaptations |
|
|
354 | (1) |
|
|
354 | (9) |
|
13.6 Strategies for Clinical Development |
|
|
363 | (1) |
|
|
364 | (3) |
14 Criteria for Dose Selection |
|
367 | (20) |
|
|
367 | (1) |
|
14.2 Dose Selection Criteria |
|
|
368 | (3) |
|
|
369 | (1) |
|
14.2.2 Precision Analysis Based on Confidence Interval |
|
|
370 | (1) |
|
14.2.3 Predictive Probability of Success |
|
|
370 | (1) |
|
14.2.4 Probability of Being the Best Dose |
|
|
370 | (1) |
|
14.3 Implementation and Example |
|
|
371 | (6) |
|
14.3.1 Single Primary Endpoint |
|
|
371 | (1) |
|
14.3.2 Co-primary Endpoints |
|
|
372 | (4) |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
14.4 Clinical Trial Simulation |
|
|
377 | (9) |
|
14.4.1 Single Primary Endpoint |
|
|
377 | (1) |
|
14.4.2 Co-primary Endpoints |
|
|
377 | (9) |
|
|
386 | (1) |
15 Generics and Biosimilars |
|
387 | (24) |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
15.2 Fundamental Differences |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
15.3 Quantitative Evaluation of Generic Drugs |
|
|
389 | (6) |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
15.3.2 Statistical Methods |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
15.3.3 Other Criteria for Bioequivalence Assessment |
|
|
392 | (3) |
|
15.3.3.1 Population Bioequivalence and Individual Bioequivalence (PBE/IBE) |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
15.3.3.2 Scaled Average Bioequivalence (SABE) |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
15.3.3.3 Scaled Criterion for Drug Interchangeability (SCDI) |
|
|
393 | (1) |
|
|
394 | (1) |
|
15.4 Quantitative Evaluation of Biosimilars |
|
|
395 | (5) |
|
15.4.1 Regulatory Requirement |
|
|
395 | (1) |
|
|
396 | (2) |
|
15.4.2.1 Basic Principles |
|
|
396 | (1) |
|
15.4.2.2 Criteria for Biosimilarity |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
15.4.2.4 Statistical Methods |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
15.4.3 Interchangeability |
|
|
398 | (2) |
|
15.4.3.1 Definition and Basic Concepts |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
15.4.3.2 Switching and Alternating |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
400 | (1) |
|
15.5 General Approach for Assessment of Bioequivalence/Biosimilarity |
|
|
400 | (4) |
|
15.5.1 Development of Bioequivalence/Biosimilarity Index |
|
|
400 | (3) |
|
|
403 | (1) |
|
15.6 Scientific Factors and Practical Issues for Biosimilars |
|
|
404 | (4) |
|
15.6.1 Fundamental Biosimilarity Assumption |
|
|
404 | (1) |
|
15.6.2 Endpoint Selection |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
15.6.3 How Similar Is Similar? |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
15.6.4 Guidance on Analytical Similarity Assessment |
|
|
405 | (1) |
|
|
406 | (6) |
|
15.6.5.1 Criteria for Biosimilarity (in Terms of Average, Variability, or Distribution) |
|
|
406 | (1) |
|
15.6.5.2 Criteria for Interchangeability |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
15.6.5.3 Reference Product Changes |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
15.6.5.5 Non-medical Switch |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
15.6.5.6 Bridging Studies for Assessing Biosimilarity |
|
|
408 | (1) |
|
|
408 | (3) |
16 Precision Medicine |
|
411 | (22) |
|
|
411 | (1) |
|
16.2 The Concept of Precision Medicine |
|
|
412 | (3) |
|
16.2.1 Definition of Precision Medicine |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
16.2.2 Biomarker-Driven Clinical Trials |
|
|
412 | (2) |
|
16.2.3 Precision Medicine versus Personalized Medicine |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
16.3 Design and Analysis of Precision Medicine |
|
|
415 | (8) |
|
|
415 | (2) |
|
16.3.2 Statistical Methods |
|
|
417 | (5) |
|
16.3.3 Simulation Results |
|
|
422 | (1) |
|
16.4 Alternative Enrichment Designs |
|
|
423 | (7) |
|
16.4.1 Alternative Designs with/without Molecular Targets |
|
|
423 | (2) |
|
16.4.2 Statistical Methods |
|
|
425 | (3) |
|
|
428 | (2) |
|
|
430 | (3) |
17 Big Data Analytics |
|
433 | (24) |
|
|
433 | (2) |
|
17.2 Basic Considerations |
|
|
435 | (3) |
|
17.2.1 Representativeness of Big Data |
|
|
435 | (1) |
|
|
435 | (1) |
|
|
435 | (1) |
|
17.2.4 Reproducibility and Generalizability |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
17.2.5 Data Quality, Integrity, and Validity |
|
|
436 | (1) |
|
17.2.6 FDA Part 11 Compliance |
|
|
437 | (1) |
|
|
437 | (1) |
|
17.3 Types of Big Data Analytics |
|
|
438 | (6) |
|
17.3.1 Case-Control Studies |
|
|
438 | (4) |
|
17.3.1.1 Propensity Score Matching |
|
|
439 | (1) |
|
|
439 | (2) |
|
17.3.1.3 Model Diagnosis and Validation |
|
|
441 | (1) |
|
17.3.1.4 Model Generalizability |
|
|
441 | (1) |
|
|
442 | (4) |
|
17.3.2.1 Issues in Meta-analysis |
|
|
443 | (1) |
|
17.4 Bias of Big Data Analytics |
|
|
444 | (2) |
|
17.5 Statistical Methods for Estimation of Δ and μp - μN |
|
|
446 | (3) |
|
|
446 | (2) |
|
17.5.2 Estimation of μp-μN |
|
|
448 | (1) |
|
17.5.3 Assumptions and Application |
|
|
448 | (1) |
|
|
449 | (5) |
|
|
454 | (3) |
18 Rare Diseases Drug Development |
|
457 | (26) |
|
|
457 | (1) |
|
18.2 Basic Considerations |
|
|
458 | (3) |
|
|
458 | (1) |
|
18.2.2 Ethical Consideration |
|
|
459 | (1) |
|
18.2.3 The Use of Biomarkers |
|
|
459 | (1) |
|
|
460 | (1) |
|
|
460 | (1) |
|
18.3 Innovative Trial Designs |
|
|
461 | (5) |
|
18.3.1 n-of-1 Trial Design |
|
|
461 | (2) |
|
18.3.1.1 Complete n-of-1 Trial Design |
|
|
462 | (1) |
|
18.3.1.2 Merits and Limitations |
|
|
463 | (1) |
|
18.3.2 Adaptive Trial Design |
|
|
463 | (1) |
|
|
464 | (2) |
|
|
464 | (2) |
|
18.3.3.2 Bayesian Approach |
|
|
466 | (1) |
|
18.4 Statistical Methods for Data Analysis |
|
|
466 | (10) |
|
18.4.1 Analysis under a Complete n-of-1 Trial Design |
|
|
466 | (4) |
|
18.4.1.1 Statistical Model |
|
|
466 | (1) |
|
18.4.1.2 Statistical Analysis |
|
|
467 | (1) |
|
18.4.1.3 Sample Size Requirement |
|
|
468 | (2) |
|
18.4.2 Analysis under an Adaptive Trial Design |
|
|
470 | (6) |
|
18.4.2.1 Two-Stage Adaptive Design |
|
|
473 | (3) |
|
|
476 | (1) |
|
18.5 Evaluation of Rare Disease Clinical Trials |
|
|
476 | (2) |
|
18.5.1 Predictive Confidence Interval (PCI) |
|
|
477 | (1) |
|
18.5.2 Probability of Reproducibility |
|
|
477 | (1) |
|
18.6 Some Proposals for Regulatory Consideration |
|
|
478 | (4) |
|
18.6.1 Demonstrating Effectiveness or Demonstrating Not Ineffectiveness |
|
|
478 | (2) |
|
18.6.2 Two-Stage Adaptive Trial Design for Rare Disease Product Development |
|
|
480 | (1) |
|
18.6.3 Probability Monitoring Procedure for Sample Size |
|
|
481 | (1) |
|
|
482 | (1) |
Bibliography |
|
483 | (34) |
Index |
|
517 | |