Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Institutionalization of the International Criminal Court

  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Izdošanas datums: 21-Aug-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Springer International Publishing AG
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783319955858
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 59,47 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
Institutionalization of the International Criminal CourtPalielināt
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Izdošanas datums: 21-Aug-2018
  • Izdevniecība: Springer International Publishing AG
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9783319955858
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

This book explores the institution of the International Criminal Court (ICC) as a policy instrument. It argues that after the Cold War the European Union started challenging the unilateral policies of the United States by promoting new norms and institutions, such as the ICC. This development flies in the face of traditional explanations for cooperation, which would theorize institutionalization as the result of hegemonic preponderance, rational calculations or common identities. The book explains the dynamics behind the emergence of the ICC with a novel theoretical concept of normative binding. Normative binding is a strategy that provides middle powers with the means to tie down the unilateral policies of powerful actors that prefer not to cooperate. The idea is to promote new multilateral norms and deposit them in institutions, which have the potential to become binding even on unilateralist actors, if the majority of states adhere to them.

Recenzijas

Salla Huikuris book on the emergence and institutionalization of the organization is therefore highly interesting from the point of view of peace research. ... This book is not only a fascinating history of the origin of the ICC, but also an important contribution to the theory of institutionalization of international norms and to cosmopolitan theories on the emergence of global security regimes. (Timo Kivimäki, Journal of Peace Research, February 27, 2019)

Part I Understanding the Institutionalization of the ICC
1 Introduction
3(28)
1.1 Negotiations on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court
5(6)
1.2 The International Criminal Court
11(4)
1.3 Normative Binding and the Institutionalization of the ICC
15(2)
1.4 Ratification of the Rome Statute and the Obama Effect
17(4)
1.5 Research Design
21(4)
1.6 Plan of the Book
25(6)
References
27(4)
2 Theorizing the Institutionalization of the International Criminal Court
31(28)
2.1 Theoretical Explanations for the International Criminal Court
31(8)
2.1.1 Defining the ICC
31(2)
2.1.2 Power and the Emergence of the ICC
33(2)
2.1.3 Joint Gains as Motivation for the Establishment of the ICC
35(2)
2.1.4 ICC as a Result of Socialization
37(2)
2.2 Normative Binding
39(9)
2.2.1 Normative Binding as a Reaction to the USA's Power After the Cold War
39(3)
2.2.2 Rationality, Legitimacy, and Legality of International Institutions
42(2)
2.2.3 The Binder: Legitimacy and Credibility as Sources of Influence
44(2)
2.2.4 Strategies of Binding
46(2)
2.3 Conclusions
48(11)
References
50(9)
Part II Normative Binding and the Institutionalization of the International Criminal Court
3 Germany and International Criminal Law
59(38)
3.1 The Evil Itself: Germany and International Criminal Law After the First World War
59(2)
3.2 Nuremberg Trials
61(2)
3.3 From Denial Toward Cooperation: First Decades After Nuremberg
63(3)
3.4 Confronting the Past: Positive Outcome of a Rule of Law Crisis
66(3)
3.5 Commitment to International Law
69(3)
3.6 Binding Attempts at the Negotiations on the Rome Statute
72(6)
3.7 Setting a Legalist Example: Ratification and Implementation of the Rome Statute
78(3)
3.8 Making the ICC a Binding Institution: Promotion of the Rome Statute
81(4)
3.9 Conclusions: From an Outlaw to a Binder
85(12)
References
88(9)
4 The USA and the International Criminal Court
97(40)
4.1 Beacon of International Justice
97(2)
4.2 The Idea of an ICC Within the Genocide Convention
99(1)
4.3 From Hesitance to Assertive Multilateralism: New Hope for International Criminal Law in the 1990s
100(3)
4.4 Clinton's Rationalist Agenda on the ICC
103(3)
4.5 The Defeat in Rome
106(4)
4.6 Making the Best Out of the Defeat
110(3)
4.7 Bush Administration's Campaign Against the ICC at the UN
113(3)
4.8 Protecting National Interests Through Coercion
116(8)
4.8.1 American Service-Members' Protection Act and Article 98 of the Rome Statute
116(2)
4.8.2 Worldwide Run for Bilateral Immunity Agreements
118(4)
4.8.3 Gradual Change of Mind
122(2)
4.9 Cooperative Turn: The Obama Effect
124(2)
4.10 Conclusions
126(11)
References
128(9)
5 The European Union's Support for the International Criminal Court
137(34)
5.1 Creating a New, Just Dimension of International Relations: European Union at the Negotiations on the Rome Statute
137(4)
5.2 Law and Justice for the World: The Struggle on the ICC
141(6)
5.2.1 Europe and the Bilateral Immunity Agreements
144(3)
5.3 The European Union's Universal Campaign in Support of the ICC
147(5)
5.4 Making the ICC Normatively Binding
152(3)
5.5 Conclusions: The EU's Normative Binding Agenda
155(6)
5.6 Conclusions on Part II
161(10)
References
162(9)
Part III Can Money Buy International Justice?
6 Explaining Late Ratification of the Rome Statute
171(24)
6.1 Ratification Decision
171(3)
6.2 Liberal Explanations
174(9)
6.2.1 Positive Influence
175(4)
6.2.2 Hindering Aspects
179(4)
6.3 Reflectivist Explanations
183(2)
6.3.1 ICC as a Result of Diffusion
183(1)
6.3.2 Persuasion
184(1)
6.4 External Influence and Late Ratifications of the Rome Statute
185(1)
6.4.1 Dependence Networks
185(1)
6.5 Conclusions
186(9)
References
189(6)
7 The Philippines' Late Ratification of the Rome Statute
195(40)
7.7 The Philippines and International Criminal Law
195(2)
7.2 Liberal Explanations for Late Ratification
197(8)
7.2.1 The Executive Versus The Legislative
197(3)
7.2.2 The Ministries: Proponents and Opponents
200(3)
7.2.3 The Executive, Again: Conflict and Violence as Reasons for Non-ratification
203(2)
7.3 External Pressure on the Philippines
205(7)
7.3.1 The United States' Influence
205(4)
7.3.2 Gentle Push from Europe
209(3)
7.4 Socialization and Non-ratification
212(4)
7.4.1 Power of Civil Society and Persuasion
212(2)
7.4.2 Norm Diffusion and Common Identities in the Region of Laggards
214(2)
7.5 The Timing of the Ratification
216(5)
7.5.1 Why Now and Not Earlier or Later?
218(3)
7.6 Conclusions
221(14)
References
224(11)
8 Why Indonesia Has Not Joined the ICC?
235(44)
8.1 Indonesia at the Negotiations on the Rome Statute
235(2)
8.2 Liberal Explanations for Non-ratification
237(14)
8.2.1 Potential Legal Obstacles
237(1)
8.2.2 Empty Promises of the Executive
238(4)
8.2.3 Ministries' Differing Agendas on the ICC
242(4)
8.2.4 The Not-So-Transparent Legislative
246(2)
8.2.5 History of Human Rights Violations
248(3)
8.3 Unsuccessful Attempts to Influence Indonesia
251(7)
8.3.1 Indonesian Foreign Policy Tradition: Go to Hell with Your Aid!
251(2)
8.3.2 Indonesia and the BIA Campaign of the Bush Administration
253(3)
8.3.3 Falling on Deaf Ears: The European Union's Campaign for the ICC
256(2)
8.4 Socialization and Non-Ratification
258(5)
8.4.1 Different Strands of Persuasion
258(3)
8.4.2 Regional and International Reflections
261(2)
8.5 Conclusions: Keeping All Doors Open
263(16)
References
267(12)
9 Conclusion
279(10)
9.1 Normative Binding and the Institutionalization of the ICC
279(1)
9.2 Binders, Outliers, and Stragglers
280(5)
9.3 How to Facilitate State Participation to the ICC?
285(1)
9.4 The ICC's Implications to International Order
286(3)
References
287(2)
Index 289
Salla Huikuri is Researcher at the Department of Political and Economic Studies, University of Helsinki, Finland. She was previously based at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University, USA, and at the Waseda University School of Law in Tokyo, Japan. Her research interests include global governance, legitimacy, EU and US foreign policies, qualitative methods, and international relations theories.
Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/97833199558582e.html
Keywords: