Preface |
|
ix | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xi | |
Authors |
|
xiii | |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
2 Fault Types and Modeling |
|
|
7 | (12) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
|
11 | (7) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
3 Model-Based Fault Detection |
|
|
19 | (18) |
|
3.1 Model-based approaches to fault detection |
|
|
19 | (15) |
|
3.1.1 Parameter estimation approach |
|
|
20 | (2) |
|
3.1.2 Observer-based approach |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
3.1.2.1 Fault detection against actuator faults |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
3.1.2.2 Detectability issue |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
3.1.2.3 Extension of fault detection to the more general MIMO case |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
3.1.2.4 Fault detection against both actuator and sensor faults |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
3.1.2.5 Detectability analysis |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
3.1.2.6 Simulation example |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
4 Model-Based Fault Isolation |
|
|
37 | (14) |
|
4.1 Model-based approaches to fault isolation |
|
|
37 | (11) |
|
4.1.1 Directional residual scheme |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
4.1.2 Dedicated observer scheme |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
4.1.3 Generalized observer scheme |
|
|
42 | (3) |
|
4.1.3.1 Thresholds of fault isolation |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
4.1.3.2 Fault isolability analysis |
|
|
46 | (2) |
|
4.2 Relationship between fault detection and fault isolation |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
5 Model-Based Fault Identification |
|
|
51 | (26) |
|
5.1 Neural network-based fault identification |
|
|
51 | (23) |
|
5.1.1 Actuator fault identification with full-state measurement |
|
|
52 | (2) |
|
5.1.2 Actuator fault identification with partial-state measurements |
|
|
54 | (13) |
|
5.1.3 Sensor and actuator fault identification with partial-state measurements |
|
|
67 | (5) |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
6 Model-Based Fault Accommodation Control |
|
|
77 | (30) |
|
6.1 Fault accommodation problem |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
6.2 Accommodation control of full state feedback systems |
|
|
78 | (13) |
|
6.2.1 Fault detection of full state feedback systems |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
6.2.2 Model-based accommodation control of full state feedback systems |
|
|
81 | (9) |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
6.3 Accommodation control of output feedback systems |
|
|
91 | (13) |
|
6.3.1 Fault detection of output feedback systems |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
6.3.2 Fault isolation of output feedback systems |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
6.3.3 Fault identification of output feedback systems |
|
|
97 | (1) |
|
6.3.4 Model-based accommodation control of output feedback systems |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
6.3.4.1 Control design without fault occurrence |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
6.3.4.2 Control design after fault detection |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
7 Model-Based Fault Accommodation Control of Robotic Systems |
|
|
107 | (24) |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
7.2 Fault diagnosis scheme |
|
|
110 | (3) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (2) |
|
7.3 Fault accommodation scheme |
|
|
113 | (9) |
|
7.3.1 Normal controller before fault detection |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
7.3.2 Accommodation control of system failures (T1 < t ≤ T0) |
|
|
115 | (4) |
|
7.3.3 Accommodation control after fault isolation (t 7le; T1) |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (7) |
|
8 Fault Diagnosis and Fault Accommodation Control for Multi-Agent Systems |
|
|
131 | (18) |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
8.3 Model-based fault diagnosis of MASs |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
8.4 Model-based passive fault accommodation control of MASs |
|
|
135 | (6) |
|
8.5 Model-based active fault accommodation control of MASs |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
8.5.1 Control design before fault occurrence |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
8.5.2 Control design after fault occurrence |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (3) |
|
|
145 | (4) |
|
|
149 | (94) |
|
9.1 Case Study 1: Fault simulator based on hardware-in-the-loop technique |
|
|
150 | (12) |
|
9.1.1 Induction motor model |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
9.1.2 Fault cases of an induction motor |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
9.1.3 Design of hardware-in-the-loop simulator |
|
|
155 | (2) |
|
9.1.4 Experimental results |
|
|
157 | (2) |
|
|
159 | (3) |
|
9.2 Case Study 2: GPS spoofing detection based on unmanned aerial vehicle model |
|
|
162 | (17) |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
9.2.2 Overview of the proposed control strategy |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
164 | (3) |
|
|
167 | (8) |
|
9.2.5 GPS spoofing detection scheme |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
9.3 Case Study 3: Failure detection of an electrical machine |
|
|
179 | (14) |
|
9.3.1 Model of induction motor |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
9.3.2 Intelligent fault monitoring scheme |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
9.3.3 Intelligent fault isolation scheme |
|
|
184 | (4) |
|
|
188 | (2) |
|
|
190 | (3) |
|
9.4 Case Study 4: Fault-tolerance control of a linear drive |
|
|
193 | (16) |
|
9.4.1 Linear drive system and control objective |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
9.4.2 Softcomputing background |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
9.4.3 Softcomputing based fault-tolerant control of linear drives |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
9.4.3.1 Normal controller for healthy system |
|
|
198 | (2) |
|
9.4.3.2 On-line monitoring |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
9.4.3.3 Fault identification |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
9.4.3.4 Fault-tolerant control |
|
|
202 | (2) |
|
9.4.4 Experimental results |
|
|
204 | (5) |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
9.5 Case Study 5: Approach towards sensor placement, selection and fusion for real-time condition monitoring of precision machines |
|
|
209 | (34) |
|
9.5.1 Proposed framework for condition monitoring |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
9.5.1.1 Problem formulation |
|
|
217 | (1) |
|
9.5.1.2 Preparation and calibration |
|
|
217 | (3) |
|
|
220 | (4) |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
9.5.1.5 Low frequency monitor |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
9.5.2 Case study: results and discussion |
|
|
224 | (2) |
|
9.5.2.1 Data collection and calibration |
|
|
226 | (10) |
|
9.5.2.2 Real-time condition monitoring |
|
|
236 | (5) |
|
|
241 | (2) |
Bibliography |
|
243 | (16) |
Index |
|
259 | |