Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

International Law in the U.S. Supreme Court [Mīkstie vāki]

Edited by , Edited by (University of San Diego School of Law), Edited by (Santa Clara University, California)
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 632 pages, height x width x depth: 253x172x28 mm, weight: 1100 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Izdošanas datums: 13-Aug-2012
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107668751
  • ISBN-13: 9781107668751
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 65,12 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 632 pages, height x width x depth: 253x172x28 mm, weight: 1100 g, Worked examples or Exercises
  • Izdošanas datums: 13-Aug-2012
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • ISBN-10: 1107668751
  • ISBN-13: 9781107668751
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
From its earliest decisions in the 1790s, the US Supreme Court has used international law to help resolve major legal controversies. This book presents a comprehensive account of the Supreme Court's use of international law from its inception to the present day. Addressing treaties, the direct application of customary international law and the use of international law as an interpretive tool, this book examines all the cases or lines of cases in which international law has played a material role, showing how the Court's treatment of international law both changed and remained consistent over the period. Although there was substantial continuity in the Supreme Court's international law doctrine through the end of the nineteenth century, the past century has been a time of tremendous doctrinal change. Few aspects of the Court's international law doctrine remain the same in the twenty-first century as they were two hundred years ago.

Papildus informācija

This book presents a comprehensive account of the Supreme Court's use of international law from the Court's inception to the present day.
List of Contributors
xi
Table of Cases
xix
Acknowledgments xxxv
Introduction 1(6)
Part I FROM THE FOUNDING TO THE CIVIL WAR
1 International Law in the Supreme Court to 1860
7(48)
David L. Sloss
Michael D. Ramsey
William S. Dodge
Part II FROM THE CIVIL WAR TO THE TURN OF THE CENTURY
2 Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1861-1900
55(34)
Duncan B. Hollis
3 Customary International Law in the Supreme Court, 1861--1900
89(35)
David J. Bederman
4 International Law as an Interpretive Tool in the Supreme Court, 1861--1900
124(40)
Thomas H. Lee
David L. Sloss
5 A Social History of International Law: Historical Commentary, 1861--1900
164(27)
John Fabian Witt
Part III FROM THE TURN OF THE CENTURY TO WORLD WAR II
6 Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1901-1945
191(34)
Michael P. Van Alstine
7 Customary International Law in the Supreme Court, 1901--1945
225(32)
Michael D. Ramsey
8 International Law as an Interpretive Tool in the Supreme Court, 1901--1945
257(28)
Roger P. Alford
9 Varieties and Complexities of Doctrinal Change: Historical Commentary, 1901--1945
285(32)
Edward A. Purcell, Jr.
Part IV FROM WORLD WAR II TO THE NEW MILLENNIUM
10 Treaties in the Supreme Court, 1946-2000
317(36)
Paul B. Stephan
11 Customary International Law in the Supreme Court, 1946--2000
353(27)
William S. Dodge
12 International Law as an Interpretive Tool in the Supreme Court, 1946--2000
380(36)
Melissa A. Waters
13 Global Power in an Age of Rights: Historical Commentary, 1946--2000
416(27)
Martin S. Flaherty
Part V INTERNATIONAL LAW IN THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY Introductory Note
443(146)
V.A Treaties After 2000
Main Essay -- Medellin and Sanchez-Llamas: Treaties from John Jay to John Roberts
451(14)
Lori F. Damrosch
Response Essay -- The Benefits of Avoiding Conflicts between the Constitution and International Law
465(7)
Julian Ku
Response Essay -- Medellin and the Passive Vices
472(9)
David L. Sloss
V.B Customary International Law After 2000
Main Essay -- Sosa and the Derivation of Customary International Law
481(13)
John O. McGinnis
Response Essay -- "Cheap Talk" about Customary International Law
494(5)
Chimene I. Keitner
Response Essay -- History, Ideology, and Erie v. Tompkins
499(8)
Edward A. Purcell, Jr.
V.C International Law And Constitutional Interpretation After 2000
Main Essay -- International Law and Constitutional Interpretation in the Twenty-First Century: Change and Continuity
507(11)
Mark Tushnet
Response Essay -- Why Constitutional Comparativism Is Different: A Response to Professor Tushnet
518(5)
Roger P. Alford
Response Essay -- Judicial Dialogue in Roper: Signaling the Court's Emergence as a Transnational Legal Actor?
523(10)
Melissa A. Waters
V.D International Law And Statutory Interpretation After 2000
Main Essay -- Empagran's Empire: International Law and Statutory Interpretation in the U.S. Supreme Court of the Twenty-First Century
533(14)
Ralf Michaels
Response Essay -- Loose Canons: International Law and Statutory Interpretation in the Twenty-First Century
547(6)
William S. Dodge
Response Essay -' Empagran: Empire Building or Judicial Modesty?
553(8)
Paul B. Stephan
V.E International Law And The War On Terror
Main Essay -- The Supreme Court, the War on Terror, and the American Just War Constitutional Tradition
561(14)
David Golove
Response Essay -- Constitutional Resolve in a World Changed Utterly
575(14)
Martin S. Flaherty
Response Essay -- Judicial Imperialism and the War on Terror Cases
582(7)
Michael D. Ramsey
Part VI CONCLUSION
Continuity and Change over Two Centuries
589(18)
David L. Sloss
Michael D. Ramsey
William S. Dodge
Index 607
David L. Sloss is Professor of Law at Santa Clara University School of Law, where he serves as Director of the Center for Global Law and Policy. He is the editor of The Role of Domestic Courts in Treaty Enforcement: A Comparative Study (2009). He has published numerous articles on the history of US foreign affairs law and the judicial enforcement of treaties in US courts. Michael D. Ramsey is Professor of Law at the University of San Diego School of Law. He is the author of The Constitution's Text in Foreign Affairs (2007) and of numerous articles examining the foreign affairs aspects of the US Constitution in the founding era. William S. Dodge is Professor of Law at the University of California, Hastings College of the Law. He is coauthor (with Detlev Vagts and Harold Koh) of Transnational Business Problems, 4th edition (2008) and has written extensively on the history of international law in American courts and on statutory interpretation in the international context.