Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Intertextuality 2.0: Metadiscourse and Meaning-Making in an Online Community

(Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics, Georgetown University)
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 28,48 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

"Intertextuality" is the overarching idea that all texts and conversations are linked to other texts and conversations, and that people create and infer meanings in discourse through making and interpreting these links. Intertextuality is fundamentally connected to metadiscourse; when a person draws on or references one text or conversation in another (intertextuality), they necessarily communicate something about that text or conversation (metadiscourse). While scholars have long recognized the interrelatedness of these two theoretical concepts, existing studies have tended to focus on one or the other, leaving underexplored the specific ways in which these phenomena are intertwined at the micro-interactional level, especially online, and for what purposes.

This interactional sociolinguistic study contributes to filling this gap by demonstrating how specific intertextual linking strategies, both linguistic (e.g., word repetition, deictic pronouns) and multimodal (e.g., emojis, symbols, and GIFs), are mobilized by posters participating in online weight loss discussion boards. These strategies serve as a resource to accomplish the metadiscursive activities, targeted at various levels of discourse, through which participants construct shared understandings, negotiate the group's interactional norms, and facilitate engagement in the group's primary shared activity: exchanging information about, and providing support for, weight loss, healthful eating, and related issues. By rigorously applying the perspective of metadiscourse in a study of intertextuality, Intertextuality 2.0 offers important new insights into why intertextuality occurs and what it accomplishes: it helps people manage the challenges of communication.
Acknowledgments xi
1 Introduction: Intertextuality and metadiscourse online
1(51)
Threading the needle: A cat meme and this book's theme
1(8)
Motivation and overview
9(13)
Theoretical background
22(21)
Intertextuality (online)
12(12)
Studies of the "meta" of language and communication
24(19)
Data and methods
43(5)
The data
43(1)
Methods and ethical considerations
44(4)
Preview of the chapters
48(4)
2 "Most `evidence' that people post has nothing to do with `clean' eating": Negotiating word meanings and appropriate thread participation
52(31)
The challenge of defining "clean" eating and foods
54(3)
The data:" `Clean' vs. `unclean' eating studies?"
57(1)
The initial post and the overall shape of the thread
58(7)
Intertextual resources and defining "clean" eating and foods
65(7)
Intertextual resources and defining productive participation
72(9)
Conclusion
81(2)
3 "I fixed it for you": Intertextuality and metadiscourse in a digital trope
83(26)
Repairing (others') contributions to (online) interactions
85(4)
"Fixing" on the FIF discussion boards
89(18)
"Fixing" as assisting
90(3)
"Fixing" to construct disagreement
93(9)
"Fixing" to joke and play
102(5)
Conclusion
107(2)
4 "I wanted to offer a brief explanation for the locking of this thread": A moderator's use of GIFs and text to cut off communication
109(2)
Discourse of moderators
111(2)
Relationships between text and image-based content
113(4)
Moderating discussions on FIF
117(2)
Intertextuality and "locking" threads
119(1)
Locking using the standardized text template
120(2)
Locking using a GIF related to the thread's title
122(2)
Locking using a GIF relating to a GIF in a just-prior post
124(5)
Locking by using a GIF related to one used by the OP, and adjusting the standardized text
129(5)
Locking by using a GIF and commenting on the moderator's own thread-locking practices
134(3)
Posters' metadiscourse about the moderator's locking posts
137(7)
Conclusion
144(3)
5 "I would suggest you tell this AAA to your doctor": Online collaborative problem-solving about offline doctor-patient communication
147(3)
Problem-solving in (online support) discourse
150(5)
Metadiscourse and communication expectations and ideologies
155(3)
Intertextuality, metadiscourse, and problem-solving
158(4)
Asking information-seeking questions
162(1)
Paraphrasing and refraining
162(4)
Telling matching stories
166(2)
Constructed dialogue
168(4)
Using the board's quotation function
172(1)
Pointing
173(2)
Advice giving
175(2)
Summary of intertextual strategies
177(1)
Communication responsibilities as expressed in the problem-solving activity
178(1)
Conclusion
179(3)
6 "He's got a right to be upset if your phone is in your face when he's trying to spend time with you": Constructing cultural discourses and Master Narratives about digital communication technologies and interpersonal communication and relationships
182(1)
Ideologies about technology and communication media
183(5)
Ideologies about communication and relationships
188(4)
Intertextuality, metadiscourse, and ideologies of interpersonal communication and relationships
192(3)
Cultural Discourse 1 Quality time and communication are important to partner relationships
195(3)
Cultural Discourse 2 Partners should communicate openly about their technology use, to some extent
198(3)
Cultural Discourse 3 Partners need to strike a balance between autonomy and connection (as well as privacy and disclosure)
201(5)
Gender on this thread
206(1)
Conclusion
207(2)
7 Conclusion: Intertextuality 2.0: Constructing metadiscourse online
209(1)
Intertextuality online
210(2)
Metadiscursive activities online
212(2)
Intertextuality and metadiscourse in an online community of practice
214(3)
"Going meta"
217(2)
References 219(26)
Index 245
Cynthia Gordon is Associate Professor in the Department of Linguistics at Georgetown University. Previously, she was Associate Professor in the Department of Communication and Rhetorical Studies at Syracuse University and a 2012-2013 Fellow at the Center for the Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University. Gordon is on the editorial boards of Language in Society and the Journal of Language and Social Psychology. She uses interactional sociolinguistics to explore theories of framing, intertextuality, and metadiscourse; family interaction; family interaction as depicted in entertainment media; expert-novice discourse; digital discourse; and language and food.