| Preface |
|
vii | |
|
Knowledge and Justification |
|
|
1 | (20) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Knowledge as Justified True Belief |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
The Property and the Activity of Justification |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Justification and Evidence |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
Conclusive and Nonconclusive Evidence |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
Justification and Defeasibility |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
Defeasibility and the Gettier Problem |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
A Failed Attempt at Solving the Gettier Problem |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
A Defeasibility Solution to the Gettier Problem |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
An Amended JTB Account of Knowledge |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Epistemology and Philosophical Analysis |
|
|
21 | (25) |
|
Concepts and Propositions |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
Necessity and Possibility |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Entailment and Necessary Coextension |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
Supervenience in Epistemology |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
Weak and Strong Supervenience |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
The Case for Strong Supervenience |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
Analytical Monism and Pluralism |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
Principles of Prima Facie Justification |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
Epistemological Pessimism |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
|
|
46 | (23) |
|
Kant's Definition of Apriority |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
Sensory and Nonsensory Experience |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
A Priori Justification and Concept Learning |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
A Posteriori Justification for Necessary Truths |
|
|
51 | (2) |
|
The Truth Value and Modal Status of Propositions |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
The Fallibility of A Priori Justification |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
A Third Way of Defining Apriority |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
A Fourth Way of Defining Apriority |
|
|
57 | (1) |
|
The Analytic-Synthetic Distinction |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
Kant's Definition of Analyticity |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
The Fregean Definition of Analyticity |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
Two Objections to the Fregean Definition |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
A Linguistic Definition of Analyticity |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
Skepticism About Apriority and the Nature of Argumentation |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
The Concept of Epistemic Justification |
|
|
69 | (20) |
|
Epistemic Justification and Two Kinds of Normativity |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
The Deontological Approach |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
Epistemic Duty and the End of Believing Truly |
|
|
71 | (2) |
|
Epistemic Duty and Evidence |
|
|
73 | (1) |
|
Epistemic Duty and Doxastic Involuntariness |
|
|
74 | (2) |
|
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
Epistemic Deontologism and Truth Conduciveness |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
Justification and Factual Probability |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
Deontologically Justified Beliefs and Truth Conduciveness |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
Internalism and Externalism |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
|
|
89 | (25) |
|
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
A Sample Foundationalist Analysis |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
|
93 | (2) |
|
The Regress Problem and Skepticism |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
The Regress Problem and Coherentism |
|
|
96 | (1) |
|
Is an Infinite Regress Really Impossible? |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
Indubitability, Infallibility, and Certainty |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
Basic Beliefs and Experience |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
Basic Beliefs and Reliability |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Basic Beliefs and Presumptive Reliability |
|
|
103 | (2) |
|
Classical Foundationalism |
|
|
105 | (2) |
|
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
Foundationalism and Coherence |
|
|
109 | (1) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
110 | (4) |
|
|
|
114 | (26) |
|
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
Coherentism and Circularity |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
Putative Elements of Coherence |
|
|
117 | (3) |
|
|
|
120 | (2) |
|
Coherence as the Beating of Competitors |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
Level Ascent, Acceptance, and Belief |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
Lehrer's Coherentism and Foundationalism Compared |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
Laurence BonJour: Coherence as Metajustification |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
BonJourean Justification and Epistemic Responsibility |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
|
130 | (1) |
|
Level Ascent and Skepticism |
|
|
131 | (1) |
|
|
|
132 | (5) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
137 | (3) |
|
The Debate Over Foundationalism and Coherentism |
|
|
140 | (20) |
|
Davidson's ``Circle of Belief'' Argument |
|
|
140 | (2) |
|
BonJour's Argument Against Nondoxastic Justification |
|
|
142 | (2) |
|
A Foundationalist Reply to BonJour's Argument |
|
|
144 | (1) |
|
Coherentism and the Regress of Levels |
|
|
145 | (2) |
|
The BonJourean Level Regress |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
Supervenience: The Case for Nondoxastic Justification |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
Lehrer's Coherentism Reconsidered |
|
|
152 | (5) |
|
|
|
157 | (1) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
158 | (2) |
|
|
|
160 | (17) |
|
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
Reliabilism and Naturalistic Epistemology |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
Rule Reliabilism and the Evil-Demon Problem |
|
|
167 | (2) |
|
Strong and Weak Justification |
|
|
169 | (1) |
|
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
The Clairvoyance Problem and the Evil-Demon Problem Revisited |
|
|
171 | (3) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
174 | (3) |
|
Naturalistic and Nonnaturalistic Epistemology |
|
|
177 | (26) |
|
|
|
177 | (3) |
|
Quinean Naturalization: Normative Epistemology Eliminated |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
Epistemological Naturalism |
|
|
183 | (5) |
|
Chisholmian Naturalism and Goldmanian Naturalization |
|
|
188 | (3) |
|
Epistemological Pessimism and Goldmanian Analytic Naturalism |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
Epistemological Pessimism and Chisholmian Analytic Naturalism |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
Epistemological Pessimism and Naturalism |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
Naturalized Epistemology and Antiapriorism |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
|
196 | (4) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
200 | (3) |
|
|
|
203 | (21) |
|
The Evil Demon and the Mad Scientist |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
A General Point About Debating the Skeptic |
|
|
207 | (2) |
|
The Antiskepticism of G. E. Moore |
|
|
209 | (1) |
|
Rebutting the BIV Argument Against Justification |
|
|
210 | (3) |
|
The BIV Hypothesis and Defeasibility |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
The BIV Hypothesis and the Concept of Knowledge |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
A Revised Argument from Error |
|
|
218 | (3) |
|
Study Questions and Exercises |
|
|
221 | (3) |
| References |
|
224 | (5) |
| Name Index |
|
229 | (1) |
| Subject Index |
|
230 | |
