| Dedication |
|
iii | |
| Preface |
|
v | |
|
|
|
xi | |
|
|
|
xv | |
| Summary |
|
xvii | |
| Acknowledgments |
|
xxxv | |
| Abbreviations |
|
xxxvii | |
| Glossary |
|
xlv | |
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
Organization of the Report |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
PART ONE Joint Precision Approach and Landing System Increment 1A |
|
|
3 | (38) |
|
Chapter Two Joint Precision Approach and Landing System Increment 1A |
|
|
5 | (4) |
|
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
Program Cost Growth and Certification Requirements |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
Chapter Three JPALS Increment 1A Program Overview |
|
|
9 | (6) |
|
Defining the Need for a Precision Approach Landing System |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
JPALS Decision Landscape (1997 and 2005) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
JPALS Goal: Interoperability Between DoD, FAA, and NATO for Precision Approach and Landing Using GPS-Based Technology |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
Chapter Four The Milestone B Program: JPALS Increment 1A |
|
|
15 | (6) |
|
JPALS Increment 1A Program Cost and Planned Quantity After Milestone B |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
JPALS Increment 1A Framing Assumptions |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
Chapter Five Root Cause Analysis |
|
|
21 | (16) |
|
Root Cause: FAA Transition to GPS-Based Precision Approach and Landing Diverges from DoD JPALS Planning |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
Evidence Supporting Root Cause Analysis |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
Contributing Factor: Program Interdependencies Caused Cost Growth and Schedule Slip in Increment 1A |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
|
30 | (4) |
|
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
|
|
37 | (4) |
|
PART TWO Assessing the Department of Defense Weapons System Acquisition Portfolio |
|
|
41 | (92) |
|
Chapter Seven A Methodology for Assessing the Department of Defense Acquisition Portfolio |
|
|
43 | (6) |
|
Developing an Approach to Portfolio Assessment |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
Chapter Eight Construction of a Portfolio Analysis: Objectives, Portfolios, Data, Metrics, and Visualization Selection |
|
|
49 | (28) |
|
Identifying Portfolio Analysis Objectives |
|
|
49 | (2) |
|
Selecting Data and Metrics |
|
|
51 | (12) |
|
|
|
53 | (2) |
|
|
|
55 | (8) |
|
Addressing Data Anomalies and Challenges |
|
|
63 | (6) |
|
Data Anomalies and Challenges Within the Test Case, "Watch List" Portfolio |
|
|
63 | (2) |
|
Data Anomalies and Challenges Within the Satellite and Helicopter Portfolios |
|
|
65 | (3) |
|
Assumptions Made to Address Anomalies |
|
|
68 | (1) |
|
Additional Data Considerations |
|
|
69 | (1) |
|
Calculating Portfolio Metrics and Statistical Significance |
|
|
69 | (2) |
|
Visualizing Portfolio Metrics |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
Chapter Nine Initial Examination of Defined Metrics: Helicopter and Satellite Portfolios |
|
|
77 | (32) |
|
|
|
77 | (11) |
|
Portfolio Composition and Latest Milestone Achieved |
|
|
78 | (3) |
|
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
Percentage of Funds Remaining |
|
|
83 | (3) |
|
Portfolio Churn: Quantity Changes |
|
|
86 | (2) |
|
|
|
88 | (11) |
|
Nunn-McCurdy and APB Breaches |
|
|
88 | (4) |
|
|
|
92 | (7) |
|
|
|
99 | (8) |
|
|
|
107 | (2) |
|
Chapter Ten Expanded Narrative of the Helicopter Portfolio |
|
|
109 | (20) |
|
Providing Further Context |
|
|
110 | (2) |
|
|
|
112 | (10) |
|
Deeper Examination into Cost and Schedule Risk: Unit Cost and Breaches |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
Unit Cost Growth and the Effects of Rebaselining |
|
|
117 | (5) |
|
APB and Nunn-McCurdy Breach Trends |
|
|
122 | (7) |
|
Chapter Eleven Summary and Way Ahead |
|
|
129 | (4) |
|
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 | (4) |
|
B Assessing the "Test Case" Portfolio |
|
|
137 | (20) |
| Bibliography |
|
157 | |
