Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Kant's Theory of Normativity: Exploring the Space of Reason

(University of South Carolina)
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-Feb-2017
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781108116831
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 36,87 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: PDF+DRM
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-Feb-2017
  • Izdevniecība: Cambridge University Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781108116831

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Konstantin Pollok offers the first book-length analysis of Kant's theory of normativity that covers foundational issues in theoretical and practical philosophy as well as aesthetics. Interpreting Kant's 'critical turn' as a normative turn, he argues that Kant's theory of normativity is both original and radical: it departs from the perfectionist ideal of early modern rationalism, and arrives at an unprecedented framework of synthetic a priori principles that determine the validity of our judgments. Pollok examines the hylomorphism in Kant's theory of normativity and relates Kant's idea of our reason's self-legislation to the 'natural right' tradition, revealing Kant's debt to his predecessors as well as his relevance to contemporary debates on normativity. This book will appeal to academic researchers and advanced students of Kant, early modern philosophy and intellectual history.

Recenzijas

'Pollok's book deserves close engagement; it is uncommonly demanding, but it is also uncommonly rich.' Yoon H. Choi, Notre Dame Philosophical Review ' readers will appreciate Pollok's well-researched account of the unity of the critical philosophy and his explanation of how, on Kant's view, we can be bound by norms. It is an important piece of Kant scholarship.' Matthew C. Altman, Journal of the History of Philosophy 'Kant's Theory of Normativity is a fascinating, outstandingly structured and extensive research into the core of Kant's critical philosophy. Its all-encompassing perspective not only casts light on different problematic aspects of Kant's thought but, most importantly, lets the reader realize how these different aspects are all traceable back to reason's attempt to self-legislate its own demands.' Luigi Filieri, Studi Kantiani

Papildus informācija

A milestone in Kant scholarship, this interpretation of his critical philosophy makes sense of his notorious 'synthetic judgments a priori'.
Preface and Acknowledgments xi
List of Abbreviations
xiv
Introduction 1(22)
1 Kant's Theory of Normativity?
1(11)
2 Outline of Work
12(11)
Part I From the Clarity of Ideas to the Validity of Judgments
23(94)
Introduction
23(4)
1 Kant's Farewell to Perfectionism
27(31)
1.1 Discharging `Perfection' as the Supreme Ratio Essendi et Cognoscendi in Early-Modern Rationalism
27(17)
1.1.1 Ontological and Epistemological Perfection
28(8)
1.1.2 Practical Perfection or Perfectibility
36(4)
1.1.3 Aesthetic Perfection
40(4)
1.2 Kant's Search for a `Secure Path of a Science'
44(12)
1.2.1 Starting the Critical Turn: Distinct Ideas Are Judgments
44(5)
1.2.2 Completing the Critical Turn: `How Are Synthetic Judgments A Priori Possible?'
49(7)
1.3 Conclusion
56(2)
2 The Concept of Judgment and the Divisions of Philosophy
58(23)
2.1 Conceptual Vagueness
58(2)
2.2 The General Concept of Judgment
60(3)
2.3 The Spontaneity of Synthesis
63(5)
2.4 Kant's Division of `Rational Cognition from Concepts' (Vernunfterkenntnis)
68(10)
2.4.1 Modality and the Trichotomy of Higher Faculties of the Mind
68(5)
2.4.2 Analytic Divisions of Philosophy --- Methodological and Metaphysical
73(1)
2.4.3 Synthetic Divisions of Philosophy --- The Faculties of the Mind
74(1)
2.4.3.1 Cognition, Desire, Feeling of Pleasure and Displeasure
74(2)
2.4.3.2 Higher Faculties as the Home of Principles of Judgments
76(2)
2.5 Conclusion
78(3)
3 Kant's Taxonomy of Judgments
81(36)
3.1 Kant's formal Division of Judgments
81(6)
3.2 Kant's Material Division of Judgments
87(27)
3.2.1 A Priori/A Posteriori The Source of the Propositional Content of a Judgment
88(3)
3.2.2 Analytic/Synthetic The Scope of the Propositional Content of a Judgment
91(5)
3.2.3 Objective/Subjective The Validity of a Judgment
96(5)
3.2.4 Determining/Reflective Judgments The Extrinsic and Intrinsic Guidance of the Power of Judgment
101(6)
3.2.5 Constitutive/Regulative The Justificatory Status of Principles
107(7)
3.3 Conclusion
114(3)
Part II Kant's Transcendental Hylomorphism
117(80)
Introduction
117(4)
4 Hylomorphism and Normativity
121(22)
4.1 Kant on Predecessor Versions of Hylomorphism
121(10)
4.1.1 Ontological Versus Transcendental Hylomorphism
121(2)
4.1.2 Historical Embedding
123(8)
4.2 `The formal in Our Knowledge Is the Preeminent Business of Philosophy'
131(10)
4.2.1 Kant's Case for a formal Logic
131(4)
4.2.2 `Metaphysics Is Philosophy About form'
135(6)
4.3 Conclusion
141(2)
5 Determinable Sensibility and Intellectual Determination
143(54)
5.1 Transcendental Matter and form
143(5)
5.2 Intuition
148(9)
5.2.1 Matter and form of Intuition
148(2)
5.2.2 `Forma non Afficit'
150(7)
5.3 Concept
157(7)
5.3.1 Concepts as forms
158(3)
5.3.2 The form of Concepts
161(3)
5.4 Judgment
164(7)
5.4.1 The Relation Between Concept and Judgment
164(2)
5.4.2 The forms of Judgments
166(5)
5.5 Inference
171(7)
5.5.1 Immediate Inferences
171(2)
5.5.2 Mediate Inferences
173(5)
5.6 System of Cognition
178(15)
5.6.1 Metaphysics of Nature
179(3)
5.6.2 Metaphysics of Morals
182(4)
5.6.3 `A Single Philosophical System'
186(1)
5.6.3.1 New Elements for the Solution of the Problem
186(2)
5.6.3.2 Tentative Steps Toward an Ethicotheology
188(5)
5.7 Conclusion
193(4)
Part III The Legislation of Pure Reason
197(111)
Introduction
197(4)
6 `Reason Prescribes Laws to Us'
201(19)
6.1 Self-Legislation
201(3)
6.2 Reason `In General'
204(2)
6.3 The Natural Right Tradition and Kant's Distinction Between Homo Phaenomenon and Homo Noumenon
206(5)
6.4 Synthetic Principles A Priori and the Validity of Our Judgments
211(8)
6.4.1 The Role of Synthetic Principles A Priori in the Development of Kant's Critical Philosophy
212(1)
6.4.1.1 The Motivational Trajectory from the First to the Second Critique
212(3)
6.4.1.2 The Motivational Trajectory from the Second to the Third Critique
215(4)
6.5 Conclusion
219(1)
7 The Normativity of Judgments of Experience
220(29)
7.1 Intellectus Archetypus and Intellectus Discursivus
221(4)
7.2 `Categories Are Concepts That Prescribe Laws A Priori to Appearances'
225(8)
7.2.1 Transcendental Unity of Self-Consciousness
226(3)
7.2.2 `Figurative Synthesis'
229(4)
7.3 Schematism: `How Is the Application of the Category to Appearances Possible?'
233(5)
7.4 Principles: `Conditions of the Possibility of the Objects of Experience'
238(10)
7.4.1 Mathematical Principles
240(2)
7.4.2 Dynamical Principles
242(6)
7.5 Conclusion
248(1)
8 The Normativity of Practical Judgments
249(24)
8.1 The `Decisive Influence of Reason on Our Actions'
251(4)
8.2 The Common Ground of Kant's Imperatives
255(3)
8.3 The Difference Between Kant's Imperatives
258(5)
8.4 `Morally Practical Reason in Us Is Humanity (Homo Noumenon) That Gives Laws to Us'
263(10)
8.4.1 `Forma non Afficit' and the Hylomorphism of Practical Reason
263(6)
8.4.2 The Homo Phenomenon--Noumenon Distinction and the Concept of Conscience
269(4)
9 The Normativity of Judgments of Taste
273(35)
9.1 Another Kind of Judgment
274(5)
9.2 Heautonomy
279(6)
9.2.1 Aesthetic Heautonomy
279(2)
9.2.2 Teleological Heautonomy
281(1)
9.2.3 Compatible Notions of Heautonomy?
282(3)
9.3 The Concept of Beauty and the Relationship Between Aesthetic Feelings and Judgments
285(5)
9.4 The Moments of a Judgment of Taste and the Deduction of Pure Aesthetic Judgments
290(14)
9.5 Conclusion
304(4)
Epilogue: Kant's Moderate Forms of Transcendental and Political Idealism 308(4)
Bibliography 312(10)
Index 322
Konstantin Pollok is Professor of Philosophy at the University of South Carolina. He is the author of Kants Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft: Ein Kritischer Kommentar (2001) and Begründen und Rechtfertigen: Eine Untersuchung zum Verhältnis zwischen rationalen Erfordernissen und prävalenten Handlungsgründen (2009).