Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

King Arthur and the Languages of Britain: Examining the Linguistic Evidence [Hardback]

(Independent Scholar, Australia)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 216 pages, height x width x depth: 238x164x18 mm, weight: 484 g, 10 bw illus
  • Izdošanas datums: 20-Feb-2025
  • Izdevniecība: Bloomsbury Academic
  • ISBN-10: 1350443107
  • ISBN-13: 9781350443105
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 96,25 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Standarta cena: 113,24 €
  • Ietaupiet 15%
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 216 pages, height x width x depth: 238x164x18 mm, weight: 484 g, 10 bw illus
  • Izdošanas datums: 20-Feb-2025
  • Izdevniecība: Bloomsbury Academic
  • ISBN-10: 1350443107
  • ISBN-13: 9781350443105

Medievalists have denied the historical existence of King Arthur for over 50 years. Arthur and the Languages of Britain demonstrates how linguistic evidence can be employed to see if the earliest historical records that mention Arthur are reliable.

The book begins with an analysis of the evidence for the Anglo-Saxon invasions and the response of the Britons, and introduces the main methodological approaches employed in the linguistic analysis of historical records. It then provides evidence for Arthur as a Cumbric-speaker active in the region about Hadrian's Wall, before assessing the linguistic evidence which supports the validity of the references to Arthur in the Welsh Annals and the Historia Brittonum.

Bernard Mees reflects on how Arthur is recorded as having taken part in the Battle of Mount Badon, a site that has never been located, and dying at Camlann, now Castlesteads on Hadrian's Wall. He uses linguistic analysis of the evidence recorded for the existence of Arthur to support the historical reliability of these records. Mees concludes with a summary of how Geoffrey of Monmouth created pseudo-historical stories from the references to Arthur in these early sources, turning Ambrosius Aurelianus into Merlin and Mordred into King Arthur's nephew and the lover of his queen Guinevere.

Recenzijas

The question people always ask about King Arthur is if he really existed. Historians say that complicated surviving evidence in manuscripts written centuries later is worthless, but Mees shows that some of it was accurately copied from Arthurs time. Anyone who wants to know about Arthur from now on will have to read this book. * Professor P. J. C. Field , Emeritus Professor, Bangor University, Honorary President of the International Arthurian Society, Wales * An enjoyable read both for those within academic circles [ and] also for the general reader interested in the Arthurian legend. * Physics Book Reviews *

Papildus informācija

An innovative analysis of the linguistic evidence that makes the case for the historical existence of King Arthur.

1. Arthur and the historians
2. Picts and Scots, Romans and Britons
3. Roman Britain and the Germanic invasions
4. Gildas and Vortigern
5. The Northern Arthur
6. The Welsh Annals and the Northern Chronicle
7. Arthur's Twelve Battles
8. Geoffrey of Monmouth
9. Conclusion
Appendices
Index

Bernard Mees has taught history, linguistics and business at the University of Melbourne, Australia, RMIT University, Australia and the University of Tasmania, Australia, and is currently an academic visitor at Uppsala University, Sweden. His most recent book is The English Language Before England (2023) and he is a member of the editorial board of NOWELE.