Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Law and Ethics of Freedom of Thought, Volume 1: Neuroscience, Autonomy, and Individual Rights

  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 130,27 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Freedom of thought is one of the great and venerable notions of Western thought, often celebrated in philosophical texts – and described as a crucial right in American, European, and International Law, and in that of other jurisdictions.  What it means more precisely is, however, anything but clear; surprisingly little writing has been devoted to it.  In the past, perhaps, there has been little need for such elaboration.  As one Supreme Court Justice stressed, “[ f]reedom to think is absolute of its own nature” because even “the most tyrannical government is powerless to control the inward workings of the mind.” But the rise of brain scanning, cognition enhancement, and other emerging technologies make this question a more pressing one. This volume provides an interdisciplinary exploration of how freedom of thought might function as an ethical principle and as a constitutional or human right.  It draws on philosophy, legal analysis, history, and reflections on neuroscience and neurotechnology to explore what respect for freedom of thought (or an individual’s cognitive liberty or autonomy) requires.
1. Freedom of Thought in Political History (Lucas Swaine).- 2. Freedom
of Thought: Who, What, and Why? (Simon McCarthy-Jones).- 3. Freedom of
Thought as an International Human Right: Suggestions for a Theory of a Living
Right (Jan Christoph Bublitz).- 4. Freedom of Thought and the Structure of
American Constitutional Rights (Marc Jonathan Blitz).- 5. Why Is It Wrong to
Punish Thought (Gabriel S. Mendlow).- 6. Autonomy, Evidence-Responsiveness,
and the Ethics of Influence (Fay Niker, Gidon Felsen, Saskia K. Nagel & Peter
B. Reiner).- 7. The Ethics of Memory Dampening (Adam Kolber).- 8. Cognitive
Liberty of the Person with a Psychiatric Disorder (Mari Stenlund).-
9. Technology Against Technology: A Case for Embedding Limits in Neurodevices
to Protect Our Freedom of Thought (Andrea Lavazza).- 10. Varieties of
(Extended) Thought Manipulation (J. Adam Carter). 
Marc Jonathan Blitz is Alan Joseph Bennett Professor of Law at Oklahoma City University, USA. His scholarship and teaching focus on how emerging technologies such as cognitive enhancement, brain scanning technologies, and virtual and augmented reality raise questions about freedom of speech, privacy, and other areas of American constitutional law.

Jan Christoph Bublitz is a researcher at the Faculty of Law at Universität Hamburg, Germany. His research focuses on criminal law, legal theory, and human rights law, often with an interdisciplinary twist. He was awarded the Young Scholar Prize of the International Association of Legal and Social Philosophy for studies on the right to freedom of thought.