Preface to the Fifth Edition |
|
v | |
|
|
xxiii | |
|
|
lxxiii | |
|
Table of Statutory Instruments |
|
|
lxxxiii | |
|
Table of European, International and Foreign Legislation |
|
|
lxxxv | |
Abbreviations |
|
lxxxvii | |
|
PART I UNDERSTANDING EVIDENCE: THE FOUNDATIONS OF THE LAW |
|
|
|
1 An Introduction To The Law Of Evidence |
|
|
|
A Evidence, Inference and Proof |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
B Concepts and Terminology |
|
|
3 | (12) |
|
1 Materiality and the objects of proof |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
(B) Evidentiary facts (facts relevant to the facts in issue) |
|
|
7 | (5) |
|
(C) Facts relating to the credibility of witnesses |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
(D) Facts relating to the admissibility of evidence |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
2 Relevance and admissibility |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
C The Character of the Law of Evidence |
|
|
15 | (5) |
|
1 Civil and criminal proceedings distinguished |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
3 The multiplicity of styles of legal proceedings |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
D The Development of the Law of Evidence |
|
|
|
|
20 | (4) |
|
|
24 | |
|
2 The Aims Of The Law Of Evidence |
|
|
|
A Introduction: Evidence, Legal Process and Adjudication |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
B The Rationalist Model of Adjudication |
|
|
3 | (7) |
|
1 Constraints on freedom of proof |
|
|
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
(D) Pursuit of other values |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
2 Settling competing objectives |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
C Individual Rights and the Law of Evidence |
|
|
|
1 The foundation values for individual rights |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
2 The right against wrongful conviction |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
D The Human Rights Act 1998 |
|
|
15 | (7) |
|
E Legitimacy of Adjudication |
|
|
22 | |
|
3 Relevance And Admissibility |
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
|
|
2 | (4) |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
3 Logical relevance and exclusionary discretion: the "costs" of admission |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
(A) Superfluity, delay and expense |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
(B) Multiplicity of issues |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
(C) Confusion and misleading of the jury |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
|
14 | (4) |
|
5 Case study of relevance I: "lifestyle" evidence in drugs cases |
|
|
18 | (3) |
|
6 Case study of relevance II: the lies of the accused |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
D Exclusionary Discretion in Criminal Cases |
|
|
26 | |
|
1 Discretionary exclusion at common law |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
(A) Evidence whose prejudicial effect exceeds its probative value |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
(B) Fairness to the accused |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
2 PACE section 82(3): the preservation of the common law |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
3 PACE section 78: protection of the fairness of the proceedings |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
(A) The legislative history of section 78 |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
(B) The ordinary meaning of section 78 read in the context of PACE |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
(C) Judicial opinion supporting a wide application of section 78 |
|
|
36 | (2) |
|
(D) Judicial opinion rejecting a wide application of section 78 |
|
|
38 | (3) |
|
(E) General principles relating to the application of section 78 |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
4 The rationale of discretionary exclusion |
|
|
42 | |
|
|
|
|
1 | (7) |
|
B Questions of Fact and questions of Law |
|
|
|
1 The basic distinction and the allocation of decision-making |
|
|
3 | |
|
2 Qualifying the distinction and blurring the division of function in jury trials |
|
|
4 | |
|
3 Submissions of no case to answer |
|
|
7 | |
|
C Legal Controls on Factfinding |
|
|
8 | (5) |
|
D Fact-Scepticism and the Construction of Knowledge |
|
|
|
1 Reconstructing a "true" reality |
|
|
10 | |
|
2 The social contingency of facts |
|
|
13 | (3) |
|
E Theories of Factfinding |
|
|
16 | |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
2 Mathematical models of reasoning |
|
|
22 | (8) |
|
3 Narrative and story-telling |
|
|
30 | |
|
PART II OBTAINING EVIDENCE: PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES AND THE REGULATION OF ACCESS |
|
|
|
5 The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination And The Right To Silence |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
B The Relationship of the Privilege against Self-Incrimination and the Right to Silence |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
C The Privilege against Self-Incrimination |
|
|
|
1 The privilege against self-incrimination at common law |
|
|
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
2 Statutory restrictions on the privilege |
|
|
8 | (3) |
|
3 The privilege against self-incrimination and ECHR article 6 |
|
|
|
(A) Incorporation of the privilege into article 6 |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
(B) Scope of the privilege |
|
|
14 | (3) |
|
|
|
1 The relevance of silence |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
2 The common law right lo silence in the police station |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
3 Statutory reform of the right to silence |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
4 Section 34 and the ECHR |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
5 The interpretation of section 34 |
|
|
|
(A) The statutory conditions and the nature of the test |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
(B) Facts which it would be reasonable to expect the accused to mention |
|
|
26 | (3) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
(D) Reasons for silence and legal advice to remain silent |
|
|
30 | (5) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
(G) Exclusionary discretion |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
(H) Continued application of common law |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
E Theories of Underlying Purposes and Values |
|
|
40 | |
|
1 Protection of the innocent against wrongful conviction |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
2 Presumption of innocence |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
4 Protection from cruel choices |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
5 Legitimacy and abuse of power |
|
|
50 | |
|
|
|
|
|
1 Confessions and criminal justice |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
2 The meaning of "confession " |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
3 The issues raised by confession evidence |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
B Section 76: The Rules of Admissibility |
|
|
|
1 Confessions admissible as exceptions to the hearsay ride |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
2 Prohibited methods of obtaining confessions--procedural issues |
|
|
10 | (4) |
|
3 The rule against oppression |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
(A) "Torture, inhuman or degrading treatment" |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
(B) The use or threat of violence (whether or not amounting to torture)" |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
(C) Other forms of "oppression " |
|
|
17 | (6) |
|
4 The scope and application of the "reliability" rule |
|
|
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
(B) "Anything said or done" |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
C Discretionary Exclusion of Confession Evidence |
|
|
|
1 The general principles of discretionary exclusion under PACE section 78 |
|
|
27 | (3) |
|
2 Breach of the right to legal advice |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
3 Breach of the requirements for recording of interviews |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
4 Other breaches of PACE or the Codes of Practice |
|
|
35 | (2) |
|
D Other Issues Relating to Confessions |
|
|
|
1 Relevance of confessions for reasons other than their truth |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
2 Evidence of subsequently discovered facts |
|
|
38 | (2) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
4 Safeguards against unreliability |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
5 Use by an accused of a confession by a co-accused |
|
|
42 | |
|
7 Identification Evidence |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
B The Problems of Eyewitness Evidence of Identity |
|
|
|
1 Miscarriages of justice |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
2 The psychological research |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
6 | |
|
(B) Storage and retrieval of memory |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
(C) Evaluation of eyewitness accuracy |
|
|
8 | |
|
C Obtaining Eyewitness Evidence of Identity: The Legal Response |
|
|
9 | (14) |
|
1 The purpose and scope of Code D generally |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
2 The purpose and scope of Code D: on-the-spot investigations |
|
|
12 | (8) |
|
3 The application of Code D and the consequences of breach |
|
|
|
(A) An overview of Code D |
|
|
16 | |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
D Problems of Adducing Identification Evidence at Trial |
|
|
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
2 Evidence of previous identifications by witnesses |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
3 Identification by the court: evidence of recordings, photographs and photofits |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
E The Evaluation of Eyewitness Evidence of Identification |
|
|
|
1 The Turnbull guidelines |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2 When do the guidelines apply? |
|
|
30 | (3) |
|
3 The terms of the warning |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
4 Good and poor quality identifications |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
F Scientific and Other Expert Evidence |
|
|
37 | |
|
8 Evidence Obtained By Illegal Or Unfair Means |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
B The Common Law Relating to Illegally or Unfairly Obtained Evidence |
|
|
|
|
3 | (3) |
|
2 Exclusionary discretion at common law |
|
|
|
(A) The development of the "fairness" discretion |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
|
8 | (4) |
|
C The Statutory Discretions to Exclude Evidence |
|
|
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
D The Application of Section 78 |
|
|
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
2 Illegally obtained evidence |
|
|
|
(A) Breaches of PACE and the Codes Of Practice |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
(B) Breaches of the Road Traffic Act in drink-driving cases |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
(C) Other forms of unlawful conduct |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
3 Unfairly obtained evidence |
|
|
|
(A) Deception in questioning and abuse of the police role |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
(C) Entrapment and agents provocateurs |
|
|
26 | (6) |
|
E Abuse of Process and Exclusionary Discretion |
|
|
32 | |
|
9 Disclosure And Immunity |
|
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
B Disclosure in Civil Cases |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
C Disclosure in Criminal Cases |
|
|
|
1 The disclosure issue in context |
|
|
6 | (2) |
|
2 Disclosure from arrest to committal |
|
|
8 | (2) |
|
3 The Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 |
|
|
|
(A) The scheme of the Act |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
(B) The prosecutor's duties of disclosure |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
D Public Interest Immunity in Civil Proceedings |
|
|
|
|
|
(A) The nature of the claim for public interest immunity |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
(B) Establishing the grounds of a claim |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
(C) Pre-trial procedure and the rules of disclosure |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
(D) The weakness of class claims |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
(E) Duty or discretion to make a claim |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
2 Balancing public interests in different contexts |
|
|
|
(A) National security and defence |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
(B) International relations |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
(C) State papers: matters of high-level government policy |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
(D) Low-level policy communications and routine reports |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
(E) Confidentiality and the protection of sources of information |
|
|
33 | (5) |
|
E Public Interest Immunity in Criminal Proceedings |
|
|
|
1 The extent of the application of PII in criminal proceedings |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
2 Process of decision-making in PIJ cases |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
3 Fairness and the public interest |
|
|
41 | (3) |
|
F Privilege: Negotiations for Settlement and Conciliation |
|
|
44 | |
|
10 Legal Professional Privilege |
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
B The Lawyer-Client (Legal Advice) Privilege |
|
|
|
1 Statement and rationale |
|
|
2 | (4) |
|
2 Extent of the privilege |
|
|
|
(A) The meaning of "lawyer" |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
(B) Clients and their employees and agents |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
(C) The protected communications |
|
|
9 | (3) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
(A) Communications in furtherance of crime or fraud |
|
|
13 | (4) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
|
18 | (6) |
|
(D) Court-ordered disclosure: proof of innocence and other public interests |
|
|
24 | (3) |
|
|
|
1 Statement and rationale |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
2 Extent of the privilege |
|
|
|
(A) The meaning of "lawyer" |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
(B) Clients and third parties |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
(C) The protected communications |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
(A) Court-ordered disclosure: litigation privilege and non-adversarial proceedings |
|
|
35 | |
|
PART III ADDUCING EVIDENCE: TRIAL PROCEDURES AND THE PRINCIPLES OF PROOF |
|
|
|
11 Burden And Standard Of Proof |
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
B The Concepts of Burden and Standard of Proof |
|
|
|
|
2 | (3) |
|
2 The different types of burden |
|
|
5 | (6) |
|
C Allocation of Burdens in Criminal Cases |
|
|
|
1 The presumption of innocence and the general rule on the burden of proof 11--008 |
|
|
|
2 The common law exception to the general rule: the defence of insanity |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
3 Express statutory exceptions to the general rule |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
4 Implied statutory exceptions to the general rule |
|
|
13 | (5) |
|
5 Reverse onuses and compatibility with the presumption of innocence |
|
|
18 | (6) |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
(B) Classification of offences |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
(C) Construction of criminal liability: elements of offences and defences |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
(D) Significance of maximum penalties |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
(E) Ease of proof and peculiar knowledge |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
(F) Presumption of innocence |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
(G) Principles and proportionality |
|
|
35 | (6) |
|
(H) Reading down a reverse onus |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
D Allocations of Burdens in Civil Cases |
|
|
42 | (2) |
|
E Standard of Proof in Criminal Cases |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
F Standard of Proof in Civil Cases |
|
|
46 | (4) |
|
G Burden and Standard of Proof of Foundation Facts for Admissibility of Evidence |
|
|
50 | |
|
12 Forms Of Proof And Alternatives To Proof |
|
|
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
|
4 | (10) |
|
1 Proof of the contents of documents |
|
|
|
(A) Special statutory provision |
|
|
5 | |
|
(B) General statutory provision: criminal proceedings |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
(D) General statutory provision: civil proceedings |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
2 Proof of the execution of documents |
|
|
11 | |
|
(A) Proof of handwriting and signatures |
|
|
12 | (2) |
|
|
14 | (8) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
4 Views and reconstructions |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
5 Mechanical recordings and computer output |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
|
1 Nature and classification of presumptions |
|
|
23 | (4) |
|
2 Particular presumptions and proof of frequently recurring facts |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
2 Facts judicially noticed after enquiry |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
(A) Political and diplomatic issues |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
(B) Historical, scientific and other issues of learning |
|
|
32 | (3) |
|
(C) Issues of custom and practice |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
B The Power to Call Witnesses |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
C The Accused as a Witness for the Defence |
|
|
|
1 Competence and compellability |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
2 Failure to testify: the right to silence in court |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
3 Failure to testify: reform of the right to silence |
|
|
10 | (5) |
|
D The Accused as a Witness for the Prosecution |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
E The Spouse of the Accused |
|
|
17 | (3) |
|
|
|
1 Historical background to the modern law |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
2 The modern law of competency: criminal cases |
|
|
23 | (3) |
|
3 The modern law of competency: civil cases |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
G Persons Under Mental Disability |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
|
28 | |
|
14 Examination Of Witnesses |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (21) |
|
1 Relevance, credit and previous consistent statements |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
(A) Exceptions to the rules against narrative and hearsay: previous statements of witnesses admissible as evidence of the facts stated as well as evidence of consistency |
|
|
7 | (8) |
|
(B) Unclear exceptions: statements by the accused when arrested, when interviewed and when confronted with the discovery of incriminating articles |
|
|
13 | |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
(A) Refreshing memory in court while testifying |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
(B) Refreshing memory out of court |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
4 Unfavourable and hostile witnesses |
|
|
21 | (3) |
|
|
24 | (19) |
|
|
|
(A) Relevance and admissibility |
|
|
25 | |
|
(B) The obligation to challenge the evidence given in chief |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2 Cross-examination as to credit |
|
|
|
(A) Collateral issues and the finality rule |
|
|
28 | (3) |
|
(B) Previous inconsistent statements |
|
|
31 | (2) |
|
(C) Bad character and previous convictions |
|
|
33 | (6) |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
(E) Disability of the witness |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | |
|
15 Vulnerable And Suspect Witnesses |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (35) |
|
1 Complainants of sexual offences: the use of sexual history evidence |
|
|
|
(A) Some general comments |
|
|
4 | (3) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
(C) "Rape shield" legislation: YJCEAs.41 |
|
|
8 | (7) |
|
(D) Section 41 and the ECHR article 6 |
|
|
15 | (3) |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
2 Cross-examination by the accused in person |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
3 Special measures directions |
|
|
20 | (5) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
(C) Evidence given in private |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
(D) Removal of wigs and gowns |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
(E) Video-recorded evidence in chief |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
(F) Video-recorded cross-examination |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
(G) Examination of witness through intermediary |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
(H) Aids to communication |
|
|
33 | (1) |
|
4 Anonymity for witnesses |
|
|
34 | (4) |
|
|
38 | |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2 Exclusionary rules and/or exclusionary discretion |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
3 A general requirement of corroboration for all evidence |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
4 Corroboration requirements for certain types of evidence |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
(C) Attempts to commit either of the above |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
7 Abolition of common law requirements |
|
|
48 | (4) |
|
8 Use of caution warnings |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
(A) Eyewitness identification evidence |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
(B) Witnesses with purposes of their own to serve |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
(C) Mental patients of bad character |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
(D) Confessions by mentally handicapped persons |
|
|
56 | |
|
PART IV USING EVIDENCE: THE SCOPE AND LIMITS OF EXCLUSIONARY RULES |
|
|
|
16 Hearsay At Common Law And In Civil Proceedings |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
B Statement and Rationale of the Hearsay Rule at Common Law |
|
|
|
|
3 | (4) |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
(A) Hearsay is not the best evidence |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
(B) Hearsay is not given on oath |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
(C) Absence of cross-examination and the difficulty of assessing the weight of hearsay |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
(D) Demeanour of the witness |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
(E) Risk of manufactured evidence |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
(F) Risk of error in transmission |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
(G) Right to confront one's accusers |
|
|
15 | (4) |
|
C Application of the Common Law Rule: Hearsay and Original Evidence |
|
|
19 | (4) |
|
D Application of the Common Law Rule: Implied Assertions |
|
|
23 | (5) |
|
E Statutory Reform---Civil Cases |
|
|
28 | |
|
17 The Modern Law Of Hearsay In Criminal Cases |
|
|
|
|
1 | (3) |
|
B The Scheme of the Act and the Exclusionary Rule |
|
|
|
1 Structure of the scheme |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
2 The scope of the exclusionary rule |
|
|
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
|
7 | (3) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
C Statutory Exceptions: Section 116---Witness Unavailability |
|
|
|
1 Terms and scope of the exception |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
2 Reasons for unavailability of the witness (the "relevant person") 17--012 |
|
|
|
3 The requirement of leave for admission of a hearsay statement by a witness in fear |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
D Statutory Exceptions: Section 117---Business Documents |
|
|
16 | (4) |
|
E Statutory Exceptions: Sections 119 and 120---Previous Statements of Witnesses |
|
|
20 | (1) |
|
F The Preserved Common Law Exceptions: Section 118 |
|
|
21 | (24) |
|
1 Public information, etc |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
2 Reputation as to character |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
3 Reputation or family tradition |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
(A) Declarations as to pedigree |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
(B) Declarations as to public or general rights |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
(C) Reputation as to identity |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
|
29 | (5) |
|
(A) Spontaneous statements about events in issue: the "excited utterance rule" |
|
|
31 | |
|
(B) Statements accompanying and explaining relevant acts |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
(C) Statements relating to physical sensations or mental states |
|
|
35 | (5) |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
6 Admissions by agents, etc. |
|
|
42 | |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
G Statutory Exceptions: Section 114(1)(d)--Interests of Justice |
|
|
45 | (6) |
|
H Statutory Exceptions: Section 121--Multiple Hearsay |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
J The Impact of Article 6 of the ECHR |
|
|
53 | (7) |
|
|
60 | |
|
18 Character And Credibility: An Overview |
|
|
|
|
1 | (4) |
|
|
|
1 The relevance of evidence of good character |
|
|
4 | |
|
2 The relevance of evidence of bad character |
|
|
5 | (6) |
|
3 The prejudicial effect of evidence of bad character and other misconduct |
|
|
7 | |
|
C Character and Credibility: The Psychology of the Law Relating To Bad Character Evidence |
|
|
11 | (6) |
|
1 The divisibility of character |
|
|
12 | (4) |
|
2 The relationship between other misconduct and untruthfulness on oath |
|
|
14 | |
|
3 Judicial directions on the use of previous convictions and the distinction between issues of guilt and credibility |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
D The Common Law: Evidence of Character in Civil Cases |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
E The Common Law: Good Character of the Accused in Criminal Cases |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
F Bad Character of the Accused in Criminal Cases: The Background to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 |
|
|
|
1 The common law similar fact rule |
|
|
21 | (4) |
|
2 Cross-examination of the accused: The Criminal Evidence Act 1898 section 1(3) |
|
|
25 | (3) |
|
3 Reform of the law: the Law Commission proposals |
|
|
28 | (2) |
|
4 Reform of the law: Government policy |
|
|
30 | |
|
19 Evidence Of Bad Character In Criminal Cases |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
B Structure and Scope of the Act |
|
|
|
1 The meaning of "bad character" |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
(A) What is included in section 98 |
|
|
4 | (2) |
|
(B) What is not included in section 98 |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
2 Effect of the Act on the previous law |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
3 Admissibility of evidence of the defendant's bad character: the seven "gateways " |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
C General Principles of Interpretation of the New Scheme |
|
|
11 | (4) |
|
|
|
1 Gateway (a): evidence adduced by agreement of all parties |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
2 Gateway (b): evidence adduced by the defendant himself |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
3 Gateway (c): important explanatory evidence |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
4 Gateway (d): evidence relevant to an important matter in issue between the defendant and the prosecution |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
(A) Evidence of bad character to prove D's propensity to commit the kind of offence charged |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
(B) Evidence of bad character to prove D's propensity to be untruthful |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
(C) Discretionary exclusion of evidence of bad character via gateway (d) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
5 Gateway (e): substantial probative value in relation to an important matter in issue between the defendant and a co-defendant |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
(A) Evidence of the bad character of the accused (Dl) adduced by a co-accused (D2) as relevant to D2's defence |
|
|
28 | (4) |
|
(B) Evidence adduced by a co-accused (D2) to prove the propensity of the accused (D1) to be untruthful |
|
|
32 | (5) |
|
6 Gateway (f): evidence to correct a false impression given by the defendant |
|
|
37 | (1) |
|
(A) Evidence of good character and its rebuttal: the previous law |
|
|
38 | (1) |
|
(B) Evidence to correct a false impression: the new law |
|
|
39 | (6) |
|
7 Gateway (g): the defendant has made an attack on another person's character |
|
|
45 | (2) |
|
(A) Interpretation of gateway (g) and section 106: when is an attack made? |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
(B) Interpretation of gateway (g) and section 106: who can be attacked? |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
(C) Interpretation of gateway (g) and section 106: what is an attack on character? |
|
|
49 | (4) |
|
(D) Interpretation of gateway (g) and section 106: the scope and purpose of the evidence of the defendant's bad character |
|
|
53 | (3) |
|
E Cogency and Contamination |
|
|
|
1 Cogency of evidence of bad character |
|
|
56 | (2) |
|
2 Contamination of evidence of bad character |
|
|
58 | |
|
20 Opinion and Expert Evidence |
|
|
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
|
5 | (21) |
|
1 Matters which the court considers call for the special skill or knowledge of an expert: the helpfulness test |
|
|
6 | (5) |
|
2 Reliability of expert evidence |
|
|
11 | (5) |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
4 The role of an expert witness |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
5 The ultimate issue rule |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
6 Hearsay and the foundation of expert opinion |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
D Judgments and Verdicts in Other Proceedings |
|
|
26 | (881) |
|
1 The rule in Hollington v F Hewthorn & Co Ltd |
|
|
27 | (1) |
|
2 Criminal cases: PACE section 74 |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
(A) Admissibility of the conviction of a person other than the accused |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
(B) Discretionary exclusion of the conviction under PACE section 78 |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
3 Civil cases: Civil Evidence Act 1968 sections 11-13 |
|
|
34 | (873) |
Index |
|
907 | |