Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Legitimacy of Citizen-led Deliberative Democracy: The G1000 in Belgium

(Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium), (UCLouvain, Belgium)
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 50,08 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

For deliberative democrats, the strength of any democracy is public deliberation, the frequent and reasoned discussion between citizens on political issues.

Despite all the theoretical claims made about deliberative systems, the question remains how to empirically assess both the legitimacy and function of deliberative systems in the real world and how individual sites of deliberation interact within the larger political system. In other words, what is the legitimacy of each individual component and under which conditions can these components improve the legitimacy of the wider system? These are the central research questions for this book looking particularly through the prism of the citizen-led mini-public G1000 in Belgium, which grew out of a feeling of deep democratic crisis. Offering empirically measurable translations of philosophical concepts, the book enhances our understanding of how political systems function, and of the viability of a deliberative democracy at a larger scale. Finally, it provokes fundamental normative questions on how we want to shape our society, especially divided ones.

This text will be of key interest to scholars, students and practitioners of deliberative democracy, and to those interested in democratic theory and more broadly political science, communication, sociology, and philosophy.
List of figures
viii
List of tables
ix
List of boxes
xi
Acknowledgements xii
Introduction: Studying the legitimacy of citizen-led deliberative democracy 1(9)
1 The G1000
1(2)
2 Belgium as a case
3(1)
3 Empirical material
4(1)
4 Structure of the book
5(5)
References
8(2)
1 Democratic innovation in an unlikely place
10(13)
1 A society divided
10(3)
2 Consociationalism and public passivity
13(2)
3 Party politics and the discourse of separation
15(1)
4 Multilingualism and a divided public sphere
16(1)
5 The widening gap between citizens and elites
17(1)
6 The long road to accommodation
18(1)
7 Conclusion: democratic innovation meets political deadlock
19(4)
References
19(4)
2 The G1000 and the funnel of citizen participation
23(18)
1 G1000: a citizens' initiative
23(4)
2 The Manifesto
27(1)
3 The three phases of the G1000
28(6)
Phase 1 Public Consultation
28(4)
Phase 2 Citizen Summit
32(1)
Phase 3 Citizen Panel
33(1)
4 The budget and its funding
34(4)
The crowdfunders of the G1000
34(3)
The budget
37(1)
5 Conclusion: from a small group of citizens to a large citizen deliberation
38(3)
References
39(2)
3 Participants and non-participants
41(26)
1 The recruitment
41(4)
Random selection
42(1)
Targeted recruitment for difficult-to-reach groups
43(1)
Dropout
44(1)
2 The participants
45(12)
Motivation(s) to participate
46(1)
Political efficacy, trust and democratic preferences
47(7)
Evaluation of the G1000
54(2)
G'Offs and G'Home
56(1)
3 The non-participants
57(7)
Meeting non-participants
58(4)
Explaining non-participation
62(2)
4 Conclusion: diversity of participants and reasons (not) to participate
64(3)
References
65(2)
4 Democratic credentials and trade-offs
67(15)
1 Inclusiveness
67(3)
2 Effective participation
70(2)
3 Fair decision-making
72(3)
4 Openness
75(1)
5 Neutrality and independence
76(1)
6 Responsiveness
77(1)
7 Conclusion: mixed credentials and democratic trade-offs
78(4)
References
79(3)
5 Deliberation and the challenge of multilingualism
82(17)
1 The potential of multilingual deliberation
82(2)
2 The G1000 as real-life test case
84(7)
3 The transformative effects of intergroup deliberation
91(5)
4 Conclusion: from intergroup deliberation to intergroup appreciation
96(3)
References
97(2)
6 Political uptake
99(21)
1 Media coverage
100(3)
Before the G1000 (10 June 2011 -- 10 November 2011)
100(1)
During the G1000 (11 November 2011 -- 10 November 2012)
101(1)
After the G1000 (11 November 2012 -- 31 December 2015)
102(1)
2 Conventional political uptake
103(3)
Party manifestos
103(2)
GIOOO in the parliament
105(1)
3 Explaining the political uptake and looking for more diffuse political support
106(6)
Surveying MPs
107(1)
Differences between political parties
108(1)
Interviews with MPs
109(3)
4 Institutional uptake
112(3)
5 Conclusion: no direct impact but diffuse influence
115(5)
References
117(3)
7 Public endorsement
120(17)
1 Participants vs. maxi-public
121(3)
Internal political efficacy
121(1)
External political efficacy
122(2)
2 Awareness of the G1000
124(1)
3 Democratic preferences and support for the process of the G1000
125(5)
Democratic preferences: participants vs. maxi-public
126(3)
Support for the process of the G1000
129(1)
4 Support for the effects of the G1000
130(2)
5 Support for the results of the G1000
132(2)
6 Conclusion: mini-and maxi-public
134(3)
References
134(3)
8 Social offspring and long-term consequences
137(13)
1 The offspring of the G1000 in Belgium
137(2)
2 The G1000 in the Netherlands
139(5)
Seven principles
140(2)
Questioning the output legitimacy
142(1)
Comparing the Belgian G1000 with the Dutch G1000s
143(1)
3 The G1000 elsewhere and the promotion of deliberative democracy and sortition
144(3)
4 Conclusion: democratic change in motion
147(3)
References
148(2)
Conclusion: Deliberation between mini- and maxi-public 150(8)
Index 158
Didier Caluwaerts is an Assistant Professor of Public Policy at the Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium. His research interests are deliberative and participatory democracy, and democratic, social, and public sector innovation.

Min Reuchamps is Professor of Political Science at the Université Catholique de Louvain, Belgium. His teaching and research interests are federalism and multi-level governance, democracy and its different dimensions, as well as participatory and deliberative methods.