Conducting rhetorical analyses of polemical works of early modern France--including the humanist satires of Erasmus, Rabelais, and other figures alongside the low satires of uncommon humor and violence--Szabari (comparative literature, U. of Southern California) explore how the works sought to appeal to their readers in terms of their generic literary techniques; the rhetorical strategies for navigating the polemical risks of offending some readers while seeking to appeal to others; and modalities of medium, design, and dissemination. Of special concern for Szabari is the manipulation of the scandalous or offensive potential of words, which is seen to trace the early origins of a secular political culture in France. Annotation ©2010 Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com) Less Rightly Said is a detailed study of polemical literature in sixteenth-century France that explores the role of offense (scandal) in a religious and a rhetorical sense and traces the emergence of a new political genre through both canonical polemical works and popular satires and invectives. Well-known scholars and poets living in sixteenth-century France, including Erasmus, Ronsard, Calvin, and Rabelais, promoted elite satire that corrected vices but spared the person—yet this period, torn apart by religious differences, also saw the rise of a much cruder, personal satire that aimed at converting readers to its ideological, religious, and, increasingly, political ideas. By focusing on popular pamphlets along with more canonical works, Less Rightly Said shows that the satirists did not simply renounce the moral ideal of elite, humanist scholarship but rather transmitted and manipulated that scholarship according to their ideological needs. Szabari identifies the emergence of a political genre that provides us with a more thorough understanding of the culture of printing and reading, of the political function of invectives, and of the general role of dissensus in early modern French society.