Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Lexical Plurals: A Morphosemantic Approach

(, University College Dublin)
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 23,30 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

This book explores the wide variety of cases in which the plural of nouns is lexical. When a plural is lexicalized it becomes part of what it is to know a certain word: pence, for example, is lexical because it means a plurality of a certain kind - a multiple value, not a set of physical objects like pennies - and knowing this reading is knowing the word. Languages exhibit countless examples of similar word-dependent irregularities in the form and meaning of plural, but these have never been analyzed in depth from a unified perspective. Dr. Acquaviva aims to do just that, using analytic tools from formal semantics and theoretical morphology to shed light on the relation between grammar and the lexicon. After an introduction setting out his approach he divides the book into two parts. The first gives a structured description of the ways plurality can be lexicalized with an emphasis on description and categorization. The second analyzes in depth different types of lexical plurals in Italian, Irish, Arabic and Breton. A final chapter spells out the theoretical consequences for the analysis of the lexicon. The book is unusual in combining a broad typological classification with a unified morphological and semantic analysis based on a formal framework.
General Preface ix
Acknowledgements x
Abbreviations xi
1 Aims and assumptions 1
1.1 Lexical plurals as a morphosemantic concept
1
1.2 Lexicality in morphology: stems and lexemes
2
1.3 Lexicality in semantics: conceptualization
3
1.4 Lexicality in morphosyntactic structure
4
1.5 Inflection and derivation
5
1.6 Structure of the book
6
Part I. A typology of lexical plurals
2 Varieties of non-inflectional plurals
11
2.1 Introduction
11
2.2 Lexical plurals not equal to irregular plurals
11
2.3 Lexical plurals not equal to semantically irregular plurals
13
2.4 Lexical plurals not equal to pluralia tantum
15
2.5 Lexical vs. inflectional plurals: lack of obligatoriness
21
2.6 Lexical vs. inflectional plurals: lack of generality
25
2.7 Lexical vs. inflectional plurals: lack of determinism
33
2.8 Lexical vs. inflectional plurals: semantic opacity
43
2.9 Conclusion
48
3 Plurals and morphological lexicality
49
3.1 Introduction
49
3.2 Is number lexical on all nouns?
50
3.3 Lexicality as morphosyntactic autonomy
56
3.4 Plural nouns within the base for inflection
62
3.5 Plurals as inherent class feature
71
3.6 Conclusion
77
4 The meaning of lexical plurality
79
4.1 Introduction
79
4.2 Plurality without singularity
81
4.3 Ontological categories for a semantic typology
89
4.4 Conceptual/perceptual categories
99
4.5 Plural and instantiation
107
4.6 Conclusion
118
Part II. Four case studies
5 Italian irregular plurals in -a
123
5.1 Introduction
123
5.2 Description
124
5.3 The morphological evidence
130
5.4 The semantic evidence
146
5.5 Conclusion: plurals in -a as derived lexemes
157
6 Irish counting plurals
162
6.1 Introduction
162
6.2 Numeral constructions in Irish
163
6.3 Unit nouns and number in comparative perspective
171
6.4 The semantics of unit nouns
176
6.5 Counting plurals as unsuffixed stems
181
6.6 Irish counting plurals as inherently plural classifiers
188
6.7 Conclusion: Irish counting plurals and lexical plurality
193
7 Arabic broken plurals
195
7.1 Introduction
195
7.2 BPs in Arabic and its dialects
196
7.3 The lexicality of BPs
206
7.4 Derived stems in an inflectional paradigm
215
7.5 Number, collectives, and the semantics of BPs
221
7.6 Conclusion: BPs and lexical plurality
232
8 The system of Breton plural nouns
234
8.1 Introduction
234
8.2 Breton plurals between inflection and word formation
236
8.3 The grammatical relevance of part structure
243
8.4 'Collectives' and plural morphology
257
8.5 Conclusion: the peculiarity of Breton plurals
263
9 Conclusion: Plurals and lexicality
266
9.1 Lexical and grammatical knowledge
266
9.2 Lexemic plurals
267
9.3 Inherently plural stems
268
9.4 Lexical and constructional knowledge
269
9.5 Concluding remarks
272
References 275
Index of Names 289
Language Index 293
Subject Index 295
Paolo Acquaviva is Senior Lecturer in Italian at University College, Dublin. His University of Pisa PhD dissertation, The Logical Form of Negation, was published by Garland in 1997. His published work also includes articles in Studia Linguistica, Linguistic Analysis, Linguistics, and Folia Linguistica.