|
|
xiii | |
Editors' Introduction |
|
xv | |
|
Part 1 Punishment and Prevention |
|
|
|
1 Punishment Paradigms and the Role of the Preventive State |
|
|
3 | (20) |
|
|
|
I The Role of Prudential Disincentives |
|
|
5 | (2) |
|
II The Scope of the State's Authority to Censure |
|
|
7 | (2) |
|
III The State's Preventive Obligation |
|
|
9 | (5) |
|
IV Developing the Preventive Obligation |
|
|
14 | (7) |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
2 Prevention, Censure and Responsibility: The Recent Debate on the Purposes of Punishment* |
|
|
23 | (20) |
|
|
I Overcoming the Simple Contrast between Two Strands of Theories? |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
II The Shortcomings of Traditional `Absolute' and `Relative' Theories of Punishment |
|
|
25 | (7) |
|
III Principled Limits on Punishment, Guilt and Censure |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
IV Why Must the Perpetrator Allow Himself to be Roped in for the Achievement of the State's Preventive Aims? |
|
|
33 | (6) |
|
V On the Expressive Function of Punishment |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
3 Prevention with a Moral Voice |
|
|
43 | (24) |
|
|
|
I Reconciling Desert and Deterrence |
|
|
45 | (5) |
|
II Respecting Persons: Hegel and the Moral Voice |
|
|
50 | (9) |
|
III Not Treating People as Means |
|
|
59 | (5) |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
4 The `Deserved' Punishment* |
|
|
67 | (20) |
|
|
I `Effective' versus `Deserved' Punishment: a Hypothetical Scenario |
|
|
68 | (2) |
|
II The Deserved Punishment: an Essential Component of `Absolute' (Deontological) Theories of Punishment |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
III The Deserved Punishment in Complex (`Unified') Theories of Punishment |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
IV The Culpability Principle: Ways towards its Recognition within a Theory of Punishment |
|
|
73 | (4) |
|
V The Culpability Principle as an Integral Component of the Institution of Punishment |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
VI Punishment as Reaction and as Retribution |
|
|
79 | (8) |
|
Part 2 Punishment, Desert and Communication |
|
|
|
5 After the Crime: Post-Offence Conduct and Penal Censure |
|
|
87 | (24) |
|
|
|
|
88 | (5) |
|
II Defining Post-Offence-related Conduct |
|
|
93 | (3) |
|
III Justifying the Mitigating Role of Commendable POC: An Offence-seriousness Approach |
|
|
96 | (7) |
|
IV A More Expansive Account of the Normative Value of POC: Censure and Broader Retributive Values |
|
|
103 | (4) |
|
V Some External Objections to POC as a Sentencing Factor |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
|
108 | (3) |
|
6 Does Punishment Honour the Offender?* |
|
|
111 | (12) |
|
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
II Reprobation and Treatment as a `Moral Agent', ie as a Participant in Moral Discourse |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
III Punishment as Honouring the Offender in German Idealist Philosophy |
|
|
113 | (2) |
|
IV What are the Differences between Strawson and the German Idealists with respect to the Function of Penal Censure? |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
V Imputation and the Person prior to Idealism: Attribution of Responsibility as a way of Taking Identity Seriously |
|
|
117 | (2) |
|
VI Criticising this Tradition with Assistance from Hegel? (The Case of Forgiveness) |
|
|
119 | (4) |
|
7 Criminal Law, Crime and Punishment as Communication |
|
|
123 | (18) |
|
|
I Punishment: From Welfare Instrumentalism to Moral Expressivism |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
II The Communicative Turn |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
III Punishment as Communication |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
IV What does the Crime Say? |
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
V What does the Criminal Law Say? |
|
|
131 | (2) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
VII Communication as an Action |
|
|
135 | (3) |
|
VIII Again: Punishment as Communication |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
8 Can Deserts Be Just in an Unjust World? |
|
|
141 | (28) |
|
|
I Recognition of the `Unjust World' Problem |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
II Deep Disadvantage and Criminal Behaviour |
|
|
147 | (5) |
|
III Deep Disadvantage as an Excuse or Mitigation |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
IV Social Adversity in Mitigation |
|
|
156 | (6) |
|
|
162 | (7) |
|
Part 3 Rechtsguter, Harm and Offence in Criminalisation |
|
|
|
9 `Rights of Others' in Criminalisation Theory |
|
|
169 | (18) |
|
|
I Strengths and Weaknesses of the Harm Principle |
|
|
170 | (6) |
|
II Legal Moralism as the Only Alternative? |
|
|
176 | (2) |
|
|
178 | (2) |
|
IV The Concept of `Rights' |
|
|
180 | (3) |
|
V Legal Rights Claims versus Moral Rights |
|
|
183 | (2) |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
10 The Harm Principle and the Protection of `Legal Goods' (Rechtsguterschutz): a German Perspective* |
|
|
187 | (18) |
|
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
II Harm Orientations through the Doctrine of Legal Goods and the Harm Principle |
|
|
190 | (2) |
|
III Aims of the Harm-Orientation Doctrines |
|
|
192 | (11) |
|
|
203 | (2) |
|
11 `Remote Harms' and the Two Harm Principles |
|
|
205 | (20) |
|
|
|
I The Two Harm Principles |
|
|
205 | (2) |
|
II Remote Harms and the Harmful Conduct Principle |
|
|
207 | (7) |
|
III The Harm Prevention Principle and Regulatory Offences |
|
|
214 | (8) |
|
|
222 | (3) |
|
12 Using `Quality of Life' to Legitimate Criminal Law Intervention: Gauging Gravity, Defining Disorder |
|
|
225 | (22) |
|
|
|
226 | (5) |
|
II Developing a Quality of Life Conception of Harm |
|
|
231 | (8) |
|
III Application of the Model in Different Cultural Settings |
|
|
239 | (1) |
|
IV Quality of Life in Defining and Regulating Disorder? Distinction from Security Discourses |
|
|
240 | (4) |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
13 Criminal Liability for Offensive Behaviour in Public Spaces* |
|
|
247 | (22) |
|
|
I Searching for Standards of Legitimate Criminal Legislation |
|
|
253 | (11) |
|
|
264 | (5) |
|
Part 4 Criminal Justice in a Liberal State |
|
|
|
14 Can Punishment Be Just?* |
|
|
269 | (14) |
|
|
I The Three Levels of Penal Justice |
|
|
269 | (1) |
|
II A Penal Theory fit for Contemporary European Culture |
|
|
270 | (5) |
|
III Just Punishment Requires a Just Demarcation of Criminal Conduct |
|
|
275 | (4) |
|
IV The Requirements of Penal Justice Regarding the Structure of the Criminal Trial |
|
|
279 | (3) |
|
|
282 | (1) |
|
15 Punishment and the Ends of Policing |
|
|
283 | (22) |
|
|
I Is Punishment Ever a Legitimate Police Function? |
|
|
283 | (2) |
|
II The Criminal Justice System |
|
|
285 | (2) |
|
III The Police Role (or the Ends of Policing) |
|
|
287 | (8) |
|
|
295 | (7) |
|
|
302 | (3) |
|
16 The Place of Criminal Law Theory in the Constitutional State |
|
|
305 | (22) |
|
|
I Criminal Law Theory in German Constitutional Jurisprudence |
|
|
310 | (4) |
|
II Shaping the Interface between Constitutional Law and Penal Theory through a Constitutional `Right not to be Punished'? The Limited Potential of Constitutional Incorporation |
|
|
314 | (6) |
|
III What Penal Theory has to Offer Law and Practice in a Constitutional State |
|
|
320 | (5) |
|
|
325 | (2) |
|
17 Criminal Law Theory and the Limits of Liberalism |
|
|
327 | (34) |
|
|
I Questioning the Liberal Consensus in Contemporary Criminal Law Theory |
|
|
327 | (3) |
|
II Liberal Political Morality, in Miniature |
|
|
330 | (7) |
|
III Liberal Criminal Law Theory for Liberals |
|
|
337 | (7) |
|
IV Two Theoretical Limitations: Incompleteness and Indeterminacy |
|
|
344 | (14) |
|
V From Liberal Criminal Law Theory to Cosmopolitan Criminal Jurisprudence |
|
|
358 | (3) |
List of Publications |
|
361 | (6) |
|
Index |
|
367 | |