Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Literature and Moral Theory

(University of Pardubice, Czech Republic)
  • Formāts: 224 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 19-Nov-2015
  • Izdevniecība: Bloomsbury Academic USA
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781501305375
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 42,82 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 224 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 19-Nov-2015
  • Izdevniecība: Bloomsbury Academic USA
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781501305375

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Literature and Moral Theory investigates how literature, in the past 30 years, has been used as a means for transforming the Anglo-American moral philosophical landscape, which until recently was dominated by certain ways of “doing theory”. It illuminates the unity of the overall agenda of the ethics/literature discussion in Anglo-American moral philosophy today, the affinities and differences between the separate strands discernible in the discussion, and the relationship of the ethics/literature discussion to other (complexly overlapping) trends in late-20th century Anglo-American moral philosophy: neo-Aristotelianism, post-Wittgensteinian ethics, particularism and anti-theory. It shows why contemporary philosophers have felt the need for literature, how they have come to use it for their own (philosophically radical) purposes of understanding and argument, and thus how this turn toward literature can be used for the benefit of a moral philosophy which is alive to the varieties of lived morality.

Recenzijas

This is a sympathetic but clear-eyed critical evaluation of recent explorations of the relevance of literature to moral philosophy. Its insightful mapping of the territory brings out important differences between the main participants, and suggests one way in which they might be reconciled without sacrificing their emancipatory effect on the future conduct of ethical reflection. * Stephen Mulhall, Fellow and Tutor in Philosophy, New College, University of Oxford, UK * Some of the most fundamental challenges to analytic ethics have come from moral philosophers who believe literature holds forth the promise of transforming received views of what moral thought is like, and of the kinds of difficulties it presents. Hämäläinens Literature and Moral Theory offers an insightful and encompassing tour of this turn to literature, describing with particular grace and thoughtfulness the writings of Iris Murdoch and Martha Nussbaum, two of this movements most significant figures. * Alice Crary, Associate Professor and Chair of Philosophy, New School for Social Research, USA * This impressive book looks at how the study of the rich particularities of literary works became an important part of postWW II, English-language moral philosophy. The result was to weaken the hold that totalizing, abstract theory was supposed to have on analytic moral philosophy for most of the 20th century. HaØmaØlaØinen (philosophy, Univ. of Helsinki, Finland) suggests a way to understand moral philosophys relation to literature, a way that allows for a truce between those who seek to make literature an ally of theory and those who appeal to literature to supplant theory. The key, she argues, is to recognize that at this time, moral philosophical consensus is neither possible nor desirable. The authors knowledge of her subject is wide and deep, and her discussion of different figures and positions is perceptive and judicious. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. * CHOICE * Hämäläinen gives you a useful map of the territory and shows you how we got to where we are now. * The Heythrop Journal *

Papildus informācija

A comprehensive overview of the role of narrative literature in late 20th-century Anglo-American ethics, as part of a reconsideration of the roles of generalization and theory in moral philosophy.
Acknowledgments ix
Introduction 1(16)
I The beginning
1(3)
II Among revivals of ethical reading
4(3)
III Analytic ethics and the continental tradition
7(3)
IV The structure of the book
10(2)
V Where is this heading?
12(5)
1 A Literary Turn in a Neo-Aristotelian Framework
17(38)
1.1 The literary turn in moral philosophy
17(7)
1.2 Features of the discussion
24(21)
1.2.1 Moral perception
25(3)
1.2.2 Moral imagination
28(2)
1.2.3 Particularity
30(1)
1.2.4 Practical judgment
31(2)
1.2.5 Morality as growth
33(1)
1.2.6 The role of the emotions
34(2)
1.2.7 The incommensurability of good things
36(3)
1.2.8 The broad conception of moral philosophy
39(2)
1.2.9 The reality of the moral realm
41(4)
1.3 The literary turn and the Aristotelian revival
45(10)
2 Literature, Moral Particularism, and Anti-Theory
55(44)
2.1 The moral particularisms and narrative literature
55(23)
2.1.1 Meta-ethical particularism
57(7)
2.1.2 Post-Wittgensteinian particularism
64(9)
2.1.3 Neo-Aristotelian particularism
73(3)
2.1.4 Particularity and narrative
76(2)
2.2 Ethical anti-theory and narrative
78(8)
2.3 What is moral theory?
86(13)
3 Generality in Literature
99(34)
3.1 Ethical generality in literature
99(3)
3.2 A Thick medium of ethical insight (the how?)
102(6)
3.3 Ideas and perspectives (the how?)
108(5)
3.4 In dialogue with the implied author (the who?)
113(7)
3.5 Moral types: Type characters (the what?)
120(6)
3.6 Moral genres (the what?)
126(7)
3.6.1 The parable
126(3)
3.6.2 The formation story
129(4)
4 Between Literature and Theory: Nussbaum and Murdoch
133(52)
4.1 The interdependence of the general and the particular
133(2)
4.2 Nussbaum---literature, Aristotle, and social justice
135(17)
4.2.1 Nussbaum and the nature of moral philosophy (Nussbaum and Baier)
146(4)
4.2.2 Literature, theory, and an Aristotelian style
150(2)
4.3 Murdoch---an ethics of the substantial self
152(23)
4.3.1 A Metaphysics of Imagery
159(9)
4.3.2 Philosophy and literature in Murdoch's perspective
168(7)
4.4 Nussbaum, Murdoch, and the nature of moral theory
175(10)
5 Literature as Critique of Moral Theory
185(38)
5.1 A Range of Reconsiderations
185(2)
5.2 Two approaches to ethics in alliance with literature
187(16)
5.2.1 Nussbaum and the post-Wittgensteinian vertigo
192(8)
5.2.2 Measuring the two approaches as enabling positions
200(3)
5.3 The third way---enabling more
203(9)
5.3.1 The inclusive approach to moral philosophy
205(5)
5.3.2 Commitments of the inclusive approach
210(2)
5.4 Preserving the absolute
212(11)
5.4.1 The absolute in the immediacy of moral response (Winch)
214(3)
5.4.2 The absolute respect for persons (Eldridge)
217(2)
5.4.3 The absolute good---Murdoch's Platonic ascendance
219(4)
Notes 223(8)
References 231(8)
Index 239
Nora Hämäläinen is post-doctoral researcher and temporary lecturer in philosophy at the University of Helsinki, Finland. She is the co-editor of Language, Ethics and Animal Life (2012) and former Editor-in-Chief of the Helsinki-based cultural weekly Ny Tid.