Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Logical Alien: Conant and His Critics [Hardback]

4.86/5 (14 ratings by Goodreads)
Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Contributions by , Edited by , Contributions by , Contributions by
  • Formāts: Hardback, 1080 pages, height x width x depth: 235x162x64 mm, weight: 1694 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 11-Feb-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Harvard University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0674335902
  • ISBN-13: 9780674335905
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 75,46 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 1080 pages, height x width x depth: 235x162x64 mm, weight: 1694 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 11-Feb-2020
  • Izdevniecība: Harvard University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0674335902
  • ISBN-13: 9780674335905
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Are there forms of thought which are alien to us, but home to others? Is our form of thought just one among many? Or is it (in essentials) the form of thought per se? Are such questions even sensible? Descartes, Kant, Frege, Wittgenstein, among many, were exercised by such questions. Frege, and then Wittgenstein, discussed the possibility of a logical alien, a thinker whose thought is guided by a different logic yet still counts as a thinker. In 1991 Chicago philosopher James Conant published a paper which brought this issue into clear form and placed its illuminatingly into historical context. A 2011 Conference at the University of Porto - Portugal marked the twenty years of its publication. The present volume gathers the original article and the reflections on it by a number of distinguished philosophers (Jocelyn Benoist, Matthew Boyle, Arata Hamawaki, Martin Gustafsson, Adrian Moore, Barry Stroud, Peter Sullivan. and Charles Travis), followed by answers by Conant. The issues range from the nature of logical truths (the initial focus of Conference) to the nature of thinkers, and the nature of philosophy.--

Is our logical form of thought merely one among many, or must it be the form of thought as such? From Kant to Wittgenstein, philosophers have wrestled with variants of this question. This volume brings together nine distinguished thinkers on the subject, including James Conant, author of the seminal paper “The Search for Logically Alien Thought.”

“A remarkable book capable of reshaping what one takes philosophy to be.”
—Cora Diamond, Kenan Professor of Philosophy Emerita, University of Virginia

Could there be a logical alien—a being whose ways of talking, inferring, and contradicting exhibit an entirely different logical shape than ours, yet who nonetheless is thinking? Could someone, contrary to the most basic rules of logic, think that two contradictory statements are both true at the same time? Such questions may seem outlandish, but they serve to highlight a fundamental philosophical question: is our logical form of thought merely one among many, or must it be the form of thought as such?

From Descartes and Kant to Frege and Wittgenstein, philosophers have wrestled with variants of this question, and with a range of competing answers. A seminal 1991 paper, James Conant’s “The Search for Logically Alien Thought,” placed that question at the forefront of contemporary philosophical inquiry. The Logical Alien, edited by Sofia Miguens, gathers Conant’s original article with reflections on it by eight distinguished philosophers—Jocelyn Benoist, Matthew Boyle, Martin Gustafsson, Arata Hamawaki, Adrian Moore, Barry Stroud, Peter Sullivan, and Charles Travis. Conant follows with a wide-ranging response that places the philosophical discussion in historical context, critiques his original paper, addresses the exegetical and systematic issues raised by others, and presents an alternative account.

The Logical Alien challenges contemporary conceptions of how logical and philosophical form must each relate to their content. This monumental volume offers the possibility of a new direction in philosophy.

Recenzijas

This book is remarkable in its content, unique in its form, and innovative in its understanding of philosophical methodology. The essays in Part I provoke a lively dialogue. In his replies in Part II, Conant shows us the multiplicity of ways in which, in doing the history of philosophy, we blind ourselves to some philosophical possibility. In doing so, he enables us to see over and again a deep truth about the nature of philosophy and why it is difficult. The result is an exceptionally interesting and original workone that is not so much an outstanding contribution to some field within philosophy as a work capable of reshaping what one takes philosophy to be. -- Cora Diamond, author of Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, Going On to Ethics This extraordinary book constitutes nothing less than a philosophical engagement with the history of fundamental conceptions of logic from Descartes to Leibniz, through Kant and Frege, to early and later Wittgensteinan engagement that explores different ways of conceiving this history, different ways of conceiving what logic is, what thought and judgment are, as well as what knowledge is and how it relates to thought and judgment. There is a distinctive form of philosophical self-engagement that characterizes Conants remarkable Replies in Part II. No reader can enter into this mode of self-engagementthis manner of working through layers of understanding and misunderstanding, layers of criticism and self-clarificationwithout herself becoming fruitfully entangled in the very kind of philosophical activity that these Replies seek to exemplify. These pages are filled with nuances in conceptual clarification, a wealth of philosophical distinctions, and a level of rigor in philosophical reflection that is rarely found on our philosophical planet. This book will hold a singular place in the contemporary philosophical landscape. -- Andrea Kern, author of Sources of Knowledge A carefully written and cleverly argued exploration of both historical and contemporary issues in the philosophy of logic. * Choice *

PART I THE BOUNDS OF JUDGMENT
Introduction to Part I: Basic Necessities (or: The Shape of Thought)
3(24)
Charles Travis
Sofia Miguens
The Search for Logically Alien Thought: Descartes, Kant, Frege, and the Tractatus
27(74)
James Conant
What Descartes Ought to Have Thought about Modality
101(16)
A. W. Moore
Kant on Logic and the Laws of the Understanding
117(28)
Matthew Boyle
Cartesian Skepticism, Kantian Skepticism, and Two Conceptions of Self-Consciousness
145(25)
Arata Hamawaki
Logical Aliens and the "Ground" of Logical Necessity
170(13)
Barry Stroud
Varieties of Alien Thought
183(19)
Peter Sullivan
Wittgenstein on Using Language and Playing Chess: The Breakdown of an Analogy and Its Consequences
202(20)
Martin Gustafsson
Where Words Fail
222(59)
Charles Travis
Alien Meaning and Alienated Meaning
281(14)
Jocelyn Benoist
PART II THE LOGICAL ALIEN REVISITED: AFTERTHOUGHTS AND RESPONSES
Introduction to Part II: On How History of Philosophy Can Be Illuminating
295(26)
Sofia Miguens
Section I Who Is the Author of These Afterthoughts and Responses?
321(7)
Section II A History of Philosophy That Challenges Contemporary Preconceptions
328(35)
Section III Some Aspects of Conant's Version of the History
363(13)
Section IV Theological Sources of Modern Conceptions of Logic
376(29)
Section V Leibnizian versus Kantian Conceptions of Logic
405(64)
Section VI A Resolute Reading of Descartes
469(68)
Section VII Reply to Moore: Descartes on the Relation of the Possible to the Actual
537(37)
Section VIII Reply to Boyle: Kant on the Relation of a Rational Capacity to Its Acts
574(74)
Section IX Reply to Hamawaki: On the Relation of Cartesian to Kantian Skepticism and the Relation of Consciousness to Self-Consciousness
648(110)
Section X Reply to Hamawaki and Stroud on Transcendental Arguments, Idealism, and the Kantian Solution of the Problem of Philosophy
758(25)
Section XI Reply to Stroud on Kant and Frege: On the Relation of Thought to Judgment
783(47)
Section XII Reply to Sullivan: Frege on the Priority of Logic to Everything
830(33)
Section XIII Reply to Gustafsson: Wittgenstein on the Relation of Sign to Symbol
863(85)
Section XIV Reply to Travis: Wittgenstein on the Non-Relation of Thinking to Being
948(36)
Section XV Reply to Benoist: Wittgenstein on the Relation of Language to Life
984(45)
Bibliography 1029(22)
Index Of Names 1051(6)
Index Of Subjects 1057
Sofia Miguens is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Porto, where she leads the Mind, Language, and Action group at the Institute of Philosophy. She is the author of seven books and former president of the Portuguese Philosophical Association. James Conant is Chester D. Tripp Professor of Humanities at the University of Chicago. Jocelyn Benoist is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne and author of Concepts, Les limites de lintentionalité (The Bounds of Intentionality), and Le bruit du sensible (The Noise of Sensible Things). He is a recipient of the Gay-Lussac Humboldt Prize. Matthew Boyle is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Chicago. Charles Travis is Professor Emeritus at Kings College London and Professor Afiliado at the Universidade do Porto.