Foreword |
|
xiii | |
Preface |
|
xv | |
About the Author |
|
xix | |
|
1 Relevant Aspects for Optimizing the AD Process |
|
|
1 | (48) |
|
1.1 What Is Anaerobic Digestion? |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
1.1.1 Theoretical Notions |
|
|
1 | (6) |
|
1.1.2 Practical Implications |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.1.2.1 Complexity of the System |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.1.2.2 Sequential Process |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.1.2.3 Multiparametric Process |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.1.2.4 Two Degradation Paths of the Organic Matter |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.1.2.5 Influence of Temperature |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
1.1.2.6 Need of a Balanced Diet for the Microorganisms |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.1.2.7 Criterion for the Selection of Feedstock for AD |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
1.2 Technical Nomenclature |
|
|
9 | (11) |
|
|
11 | (3) |
|
1.2.2 Practical Applications and Numerical Examples |
|
|
14 | (1) |
|
1.2.2.1 Approximate Ratio between COD and VS |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
1.2.2.2 Methane Yield of a Substrate with a Known BMP |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
1.2.2.3 Coherent Use of the TS, VS, and BMP values |
|
|
17 | (1) |
|
1.2.2.4 Calculation of the HRT |
|
|
18 | (1) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
1.2.2.6 Optimizing the C/N Ratio of a Substrates Mixture |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
1.3 Managing the Plant "by Tables": Limitations and Risks |
|
|
20 | (9) |
|
1.3.1 Conclusions on the Use of Tables |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
1.4 The Dynamic Management of the Biogas Plant |
|
|
29 | (10) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
1.4.2 The Relationship between pH and Alkalinity |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
1.4.3 The Chemical Composition of the Substrate |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
1.4.5 Monitoring the Biogas' Flow and Composition |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
|
36 | (1) |
|
1.4.7 Monitoring the Electric Conductivity |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
1.5 The Outsourced Biological Management Service: Limitations of the Traditional Techniques |
|
|
39 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
1.6 The Automatic Titrator: Myths and Legends |
|
|
41 | (8) |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
2 Overview of the Laboratory Methods for the Analysis of Fermentative Processes |
|
|
49 | (42) |
|
2.1 Basic Notions of Metrology: Accurateness and Precision or Repeatability |
|
|
49 | (9) |
|
2.1.1 Definitions of Accurateness and of Precision or Repeatability |
|
|
50 | (1) |
|
|
51 | (7) |
|
2.2 Measure Methods Employed in the Biogas Industry |
|
|
58 | (33) |
|
2.2.1 Classical Volumetric and Barometric Methods |
|
|
58 | (2) |
|
2.2.1.1 Volumetric Methods |
|
|
60 | (7) |
|
2.2.1.2 Barometric Methods |
|
|
67 | (7) |
|
2.2.2 Automatic Measure Systems: AMPTS and BRS |
|
|
74 | (3) |
|
2.2.3 Reactors for Biological Tests: Which Are Better?---Big or Small Ones? |
|
|
77 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 The Most Frequent Errors in the Measure of Small Gas Flows |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
|
78 | (2) |
|
2.2.4.2 Correction of the Moisture |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
2.2.4.3 Elimination of Carbon Dioxide |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
2.2.5 Auxiliary Physicochemical Tests |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
2.2.5.1 Measure of the pH and the ORP |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
2.2.5.2 Determination of the DM and VS of Biomass |
|
|
82 | (2) |
|
2.2.5.3 Determination of the COD of Sludge and Liquid Substrates |
|
|
84 | (3) |
|
2.2.6 The In Situ Laboratory for the Real-Time Control of the Biological Process |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (3) |
|
3 How to Perform Tests under Optimum Conditions |
|
|
91 | (50) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
3.2 Measuring the DM and VS |
|
|
91 | (7) |
|
3.2.1 Measuring the DM with a Moisture Analyzer |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.1 Confusing the "Moisture" and the "DM" Scales |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.2 Wrong Setting of the Drying Temperature |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.3 Wrong Installation of the Moisture Analyzer |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.4 Measuring the DM of Silage |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
3.2.1.5 Interpretation of the Scale's Technical Sheet |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Measurement of the DM with an Oven and a Scale |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Measuring the Ash Content and VS |
|
|
96 | (2) |
|
3.3 Measuring the COD and Total N |
|
|
98 | (3) |
|
3.4 How to Design a Biological Experiment |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
3.5 The Preparation of Both Inoculum and Sample |
|
|
102 | (6) |
|
3.6 The Inoculum/Substrate Ratio, I/S |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
3.7 Defining the Mix ratio (Intensity of Stirring) |
|
|
110 | (6) |
|
3.8 The BMP Test: One General Procedure, Multiple Applications |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
3.8.1 General Procedure for Measuring the BMP |
|
|
116 | (1) |
|
3.9 Processing the Measured Data |
|
|
117 | (6) |
|
3.9.1 Step-by-Step Data Processing |
|
|
117 | (1) |
|
3.9.2 Frequent Causes of Problems during the BMP Test |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
3.9.2.1 Problems Caused by Human Errors |
|
|
118 | (2) |
|
3.9.2.2 Problems Caused by Instrumental or Method Errors |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
3.10 The Hydrolytic and Methanogenic Activity Tests: Checking the Bacteria's Health |
|
|
123 | (10) |
|
3.10.1 Degradation of Polysaccharides (Glucose, Starch, and Cellulose) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
3.10.2 Casein and Gelatin in Powder |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
3.10.3 Propionic and Butyric Acids |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
3.10.4 Fatty Acids (Lipids) |
|
|
127 | (2) |
|
3.10.5 Acetic Acid and Sodium Acetate |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
3.10.5.1 Stoichiometry of Acetic Acid and Sodium Acetate |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
3.10.5.2 First Step: Checking the Methanogenic Capacity of Acetate or Acetic Acid |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
3.10.5.3 Second Step: The SMA Calculation |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
3.11 Analysis of the Error Propagation in the BMP Assay and Its Variants |
|
|
133 | (3) |
|
3.12 A Controversial Technique: Correcting the pH, the Alkalinity, and Adding Nutrients before Starting the Batch Tests |
|
|
136 | (5) |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
4 Application of Laboratory Experimental Results to the Management of the Biogas Plant |
|
|
141 | (36) |
|
4.1 Practical Applications of the VS Test |
|
|
141 | (6) |
|
4.1.1 Measuring the Organic Load (OL) and the Organic Load Rate (OLR) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
4.1.1.1 Practical Application |
|
|
142 | (1) |
|
4.1.2 Measuring the Efficiency of the Feedstock's Conversion into Methane |
|
|
143 | (1) |
|
4.1.3 Corrective Actions in the Case ηDA < 45% |
|
|
144 | (3) |
|
4.2 Practical Applications of the BMP Test |
|
|
147 | (15) |
|
4.2.1 The Right Price for the Feedstock |
|
|
147 | (3) |
|
4.2.2 Optimizing the Biogas Plant's Diet |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
4.2.3 Preventing the Inhibition Caused by "Difficult" Substrates |
|
|
152 | (1) |
|
4.2.4 Checking the Digestion Efficiency of the Biogas Plant |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
4.2.5 Determination of the Optimum SRT/HRT |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
4.2.6 Determining the Efficacy of Additives and Pretreatments |
|
|
156 | (4) |
|
4.2.7 Frequent Errors in Planning and Performing Biological Tests |
|
|
160 | (2) |
|
4.3 Using Reference Substrates to Check the Hydrolytic Activity: How to Find Out if Something Is Going Wrong |
|
|
162 | (6) |
|
4.3.1 Hydrolysis Test of Cellulose |
|
|
162 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Hydrolysis Test of Sugar and Starch |
|
|
163 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Hydrolysis of Proteins |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 Lipolytic Activity Test |
|
|
165 | (2) |
|
4.3.5 General Substrate Inhibition Test |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
4.4 Applications of the SMA Test: Preventing the Biological Collapse and Selecting the Best Inoculum to Start a Biogas Plant |
|
|
168 | (7) |
|
4.4.1 Practical Example on How to Test an Inoculum Suspected of Methanogenic Inhibition Using Wine Vinegar |
|
|
169 | (2) |
|
4.4.2 Practical Example of the SMA Test for the Selection of the Inoculum Necessary for Starting a New Biogas Plant |
|
|
171 | (2) |
|
4.4.3 How to Determine the Dosage of Trace Elements if SMA < 10 |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
|
175 | (2) |
|
4.5.1 Usefulness of the Test with Vinegar, Acetic Acid, or Acetate as Reference Substrate |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 Reference Substrates |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
5 Some Simple Tricks to Improve the Laboratory's Operativity |
|
|
177 | (30) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
5.2 Measuring the Percentage of Methane in the Biogas with the Double Reactor Set and with the Syringe Method |
|
|
177 | (6) |
|
5.2.1 Necessary Materials for the Syringe Test |
|
|
180 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Performing the Test with the Syringe |
|
|
181 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Error Analysis of the Syringe Method |
|
|
182 | (1) |
|
5.3 Solving the Problem of the Thermostatic Bath's Evaporation |
|
|
183 | (4) |
|
5.3.1 Seal the Gap between the Reactors and the Plexyglass Cover by Means of O-rings or Rubber Bands |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
5.3.2 Add Some Very Soluble Salt to the Water |
|
|
184 | (1) |
|
5.3.3 Replacing the Water in the Thermostatic Bath with Any Fluid Having Low Vapor Pressure |
|
|
185 | (2) |
|
5.4 Improved Connection of the DC Stirrer Motors |
|
|
187 | (9) |
|
5.4.1 Description and Theoretical Analysis of the Problem |
|
|
187 | (3) |
|
5.4.2 Step-by-Step Procedure to Connect the Power Supply at the Center of the Line |
|
|
190 | (4) |
|
5.4.3 Using Brushless Motors |
|
|
194 | (2) |
|
5.5 Checking the Calibration (Volumetric Methods) |
|
|
196 | (3) |
|
5.5.1 Gravimetric Calibration Method |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 Volumetric Calibration Method |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
5.6 Flushing the Head Volume of the Reactor with a Gas Lighter Recharge |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
|
201 | (3) |
|
5.8 Some Safety Rules for the Biological Laboratory in the Biogas Plant |
|
|
204 | (3) |
|
|
206 | (1) |
|
6 Critical Review of the Scientific Literature from the Biogas Plant Manager's Perspective |
|
|
207 | (48) |
|
|
207 | (1) |
|
6.2 Three Methods to Find Out Absolute Truths: The Aristotelian Syllogism, the Cartesian Doubt Principle, and Avoiding Logic Fallacies |
|
|
207 | (10) |
|
6.2.1 The Correlation between BMP and Electrical Conductivity |
|
|
209 | (4) |
|
|
213 | (1) |
|
6.2.2 Assessing the Validity of the VFA/TA (FOS/TAC) Method |
|
|
214 | (1) |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
6.2.3.1 Information from the Literature |
|
|
215 | (1) |
|
6.2.3.2 Checking the Logic Flaws |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
6.2.3.3 Checking the Efficacy of Enzymes in the Correct Way |
|
|
216 | (1) |
|
6.3 Misconceptions of the Scientific Literature Amplified by the Marketing |
|
|
217 | (20) |
|
6.3.1 The Importance of pH and the Use of Sodium Bicarbonate as Buffer Agent in Anaerobic Plants |
|
|
217 | (4) |
|
6.3.2 The Hyped Importance of Trace Elements |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 The Use of "Special Products" for Desulfurization |
|
|
222 | (3) |
|
6.3.4 Databases and Mathematical Models of BMP |
|
|
225 | (1) |
|
|
226 | (1) |
|
6.3.5 The Conservation of the Inoculum |
|
|
226 | (2) |
|
6.3.6 The "Equivalent Corn Silage Unit" |
|
|
228 | (1) |
|
6.3.6.1 Olive Mill Pomace |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
6.3.6.2 Fatty Waste and Glycerol |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
6.3.6.3 Mixtures of Substrates |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
6.4.6.4 Substrates with Low Concentration of Degradable Organic Matter |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
6.3.7 Estimating the Accuracy and Reliability of Data Published in the Literature |
|
|
231 | (4) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
6.4 Norms on the BMP Test Procedure for Industrial Biogas Plants |
|
|
237 | (12) |
|
6.4.1 An Overview of the German VDI 4630/2014 |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
6.4.2 IWA's Proposal of Standardized BMP Test |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 The Draft of Italian Norm E0209F670 UNI/TS |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
6.4.4 Critical Analysis of the Flaws in the Existing Norms |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
|
238 | (6) |
|
6.4.4.2 The IWA Guideline for the BMP Assay |
|
|
244 | (3) |
|
6.4.4.3 The Italian Draft of Standard |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
|
249 | (6) |
|
|
251 | (4) |
|
7 Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations |
|
|
255 | (4) |
|
8 Useful Tables for Quick Reference |
|
|
259 | (8) |
|
8.1 Specific Weight of Silage as a Function of Its TS |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
8.2 Using Wine Vinegar to Carry Out the SMA Test |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
8.3 Monitoring the Electrical Conductivity of the Sludge |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
8.4 Reference Values for Checking the AD Process with the VFA/TA (FOS/TAC) Test |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
8.6 Oligoelements (a.k.a. Trace Elements or Micronutrients) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
8.7 Guidelines for the Determination of VS |
|
|
266 | (1) |
Index |
|
267 | |