Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Mandevilles Fable: Pride, Hypocrisy, and Sociability [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 272 pages, height x width: 235x156 mm
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-May-2023
  • Izdevniecība: Princeton University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0691218676
  • ISBN-13: 9780691218670
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 106,73 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 272 pages, height x width: 235x156 mm
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-May-2023
  • Izdevniecība: Princeton University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0691218676
  • ISBN-13: 9780691218670

Why we should take Bernard Mandeville seriously as a philosopher

Bernard Mandeville’s The Fable of the Bees outraged its eighteenth-century audience by proclaiming that private vices lead to public prosperity. Today the work is best known as an early iteration of laissez-faire capitalism. In this book, Robin Douglass looks beyond the notoriety of Mandeville’s great work to reclaim its status as one of the most incisive philosophical studies of human nature and the origin of society in the Enlightenment era. Focusing on Mandeville’s moral, social and political ideas, Douglass offers a revelatory account of why we should take Mandeville seriously as a philosopher.

Douglass expertly reconstructs Mandeville’s theory of how self-centred individuals, who care for their reputation and social standing above all else, could live peacefully together in large societies. Pride and shame are the principal motives of human behaviour, on this account, with a large dose of hypocrisy and self-deception lying behind our moral practices. In his analysis, Douglass attends closely to the changes between different editions of the Fable; considers Mandeville’s arguments in light of objections and rival accounts from other eighteenth-century philosophers, including Shaftesbury, Hume and Smith; and draws on more recent findings from social psychology.

With this detailed and original reassessment of Mandeville’s philosophy, Douglass shows how The Fable of the Bees—by shining a light on the dark side of human nature—has the power to unsettle readers even today.

Recenzijas

"An astute and engaging work of intellectual history. . . . Mr. Douglasss book insightfully probes Mandevilles account of prideful sociability, testing it against the criticism of, among others, David Hume."---Jeffrey Collins, Wall Street Journal "Mandevilles Fable is an enviably learned volume. Lucidly written and judicious in tone, Douglass treatment of Mandeville as a social philosopher par excellence sets a high bar for scholars who hope to walk the interpretive tightrope between intellectual history and philosophy as effortlessly as he does."---Glory M. Liu, Centre for the Study of Governance & Society "[ Mandevilles Fable] is a work of serious scholarship. . . . Douglass provides a clear and compelling account of Mandevilles moral and social thought, one that establishes its subject as a serious thinker whose provocative and unsettling . . . ideas retain today their power to provoke and unsettle."---Brandon Turner, Perspectives on Politics "[ An] excellent book." * Choice * "[ E]ngaging and compelling . . . a must-read for anyone interested in the history of philosophy and political philosophy in the broadest sense, as well as moral and social psychologyand indeed for anyone who is, or who wishes to quickly become, interested in Mandeville."---Elad Carmel, Philosophy in Review "[ An] absorbing and tightly argued book."---Ross Carroll, Intellectual History Review

Preface xi
Conventions xv
Introduction 1(24)
A pride-centred theory of sociability
4(8)
Satire and philosophy
12(5)
`Private Vices, Publick Benefits' and the origins of sociability
17(5)
A brief roadtnap
22(3)
PART I MORAL PSYCHOLOGY
25(108)
1 Pride and Human Nature
27(30)
The place of pride in Mandeville's psychology
29(12)
Pride, fear, and self-preservation
32(3)
Self-love and self-liking
35(3)
Pride and shame
38(3)
Criticisms of Mandeville's psychology
41(14)
Objections to psychological egoism
42(5)
Pride vs. praiseworthy motives
47(8)
Conclusion
55(2)
2 The Morality of Pride
57(35)
The vice of pride
59(8)
Definitional complexities
60(2)
The morality of self-liking
62(5)
The problem of sincerity
67(13)
An Augustinian view of pride?
69(6)
A satire upon morality?
75(5)
Is pride really that bad?
80(9)
Pride vs. a well-regulated desire for esteem
83(6)
Conclusion
89(3)
3 Sociability Hypocrisy; and Virtue
92(41)
Enter Shaftesbury
94(9)
Shaftesbury on sociability, virtue, and beauty
98(3)
A digression on the `Pulchrum & Honestum'
101(2)
Virtue, self-denial, and hypocrisy
103(11)
Why `a vast Inlet to Hypocrisy'?
105(4)
Social utility and `counterfeited' virtue
109(5)
Sociability and hypocrisy
114(15)
The use and abuse of hypocrisy
114(4)
Hypocrisy and the origin of virtue
118(5)
Should hypocrisy be unmasked?
123(6)
Conclusion
129(4)
PART II HISTORICAL NARRATIVES
133(98)
4 The Desire of Dominion and Origin of Society
135(48)
Mandeville's origin stories
138(13)
The role of human contrivance (1714--23)
141(6)
Mandeville's historical turn
147(4)
Sociability and the steps towards society
151(24)
On `the Sociableness of Man'
154(3)
Mandeville vs. Temple on the savage family
157(7)
The first two steps
164(4)
The third step and the origin of language
168(3)
Addendum on whether Cleomenes and Horatio switch roles
171(4)
Conclusion
175(8)
A theory of social evolution?
175(4)
A theory of political authority?
179(4)
5 Honour, Religion, and War
183(48)
The origins of virtue and honour, revisited
185(18)
Virtue and honour
187(3)
Modern honour
190(6)
The origin of honour
196(3)
Christian virtue
199(4)
The passions of war
203(14)
Duelling, honour, and politeness
204(7)
Love of country and religious enthusiasm
211(6)
Conclusion
217(3)
Conclusion
220(2)
Pride in the economic sphere
222(4)
Was Mandeville right?
226(5)
Bibliography 231(16)
Index 247
Robin Douglass is professor of political theory in the Department of Political Economy at King's College London. He is the author of Rousseau and Hobbes: Nature, Free Will, and the Passions.