Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

McCawley and Trethowan - The Chaos of Politics and the Integrity of Law - Volume 1: McCawley [Hardback]

(City, University of London, UK)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 384 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm, weight: 712 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 29-Jul-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509927115
  • ISBN-13: 9781509927111
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 112,83 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Standarta cena: 132,74 €
  • Ietaupiet 15%
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
McCawley and Trethowan - The Chaos of Politics and the Integrity of Law - Volume 1: McCawleyPalielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 384 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm, weight: 712 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 29-Jul-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509927115
  • ISBN-13: 9781509927111
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9781509927111.html
Keywords:
"In this two-volume work, Ian Loveland offers a detailed exploration and analysis of 2 Australian entrenchment cases which have long been a source of fascination and inspiration to lawyers. This first volume, focusing on the McCawley case, introduces non-Australian readers to the remarkably rich legal and political history of constitutional formation and development in New South Wales and Queensland in the 19th and early 20th centuries. It culminates with a deeply contextualised analysis of the emergenceof the bizarre 'Two Act entrenchment' principle which emerged in Queensland's constitutional law in 1908 and the subsequent and celebrated McCawley judgments of the Australian High Court and Privy Council. The judgments are placed in both their deep and immediate historical and political contexts; from the legal formation of New South Wales in the late 1700s, through the creation of New South Wales and Queensland as distinct colonies in the 1850s and the subsequent passage of the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865, on to the fiercely contested reformism espoused by Labour governments in Queensland in the early part of the 20th century"--

In this two-volume work, Ian Loveland offers a detailed exploration and analysis of 2 Australian entrenchment cases which have long been a source of fascination and inspiration to lawyers.

This first volume, focusing on the McCawley case, introduces non-Australian readers to the remarkably rich legal and political history of constitutional formation and development in New South Wales and Queensland in the 19th and early 20th centuries. It culminates with a deeply contextualised analysis of the emergence of the bizarre 'Two Act entrenchment' principle which emerged in Queensland's constitutional law in 1908 and the subsequent and celebrated McCawley judgments of the Australian High Court and Privy Council.

The judgments are placed in both their deep and immediate historical and political contexts; from the legal formation of New South Wales in the late 1700s, through the creation of New South Wales and Queensland as distinct colonies in the 1850s and the subsequent passage of the Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865, on to the fiercely contested reformism espoused by Labour governments in Queensland in the early part of the twentieth century.

Papildus informācija

This book presents a detailed contextual study of one of the most familiar cases in both British and Commonwealth constitutional history: McCawley's case.
Preface v
Acknowledgements vii
Brief Contents ix
Abbreviations xix
Table of Cases
xxi
Table of Legislation
xxv
1 Constituting New South Wales 1787--1850
1(32)
I An Unusual Type of Colony
1(7)
The Governor's Commission and Instructions
2(2)
`Exclusives', `Emancipists' and the Emergence of Pastoralism as an Economic and Political Force
4(1)
From Prison Towards Colony and from Prisoners Towards Colonists
5(3)
II The New South Wales Act 1823
8(8)
The `Legislative Council'
8(1)
Legislative Competence and `Repugnancy'
9(2)
The Judicial and Executive Branches of the Colony's Government
11(2)
Darling's Commission and Instructions
13(2)
Pre-legislative Colonial Judicial Review of Colonial Legislation -- The Newspaper Licence and Tax `Laws'
15(1)
III The Australian Courts Act 1828
16(2)
Increasing Regulation of Land Disposition and Occupation
17(1)
IV The Australian Constitutions Act 1842
18(11)
The `Constitution' of the New Legislative Council
19(1)
The Powers of the New Legislative Council
20(1)
The 1842--47 Land `Reforms'
21(1)
The Australian Land Sales Act 1842
21(1)
The 1846 Act and the 1847 Order in Council
22(2)
Van Diemen's Land's Dog Act -- Post-Enactment Colonial Judicial Review of Colonial Legislation
24(3)
Amoving the Judges
27(2)
V The Australian Colonies Constitution Act 1850
29(4)
2 `Constituting' New South Wales -- And Queensland -- 1850--1861
33(34)
I The New South Wales Constitution Bill 1853
33(11)
The Composition and Powers of the New Legislature
34(1)
The Proposed Council
35(1)
The Proposed Assembly
36(1)
Legislative Powers
37(1)
The Lawmaking Process: The `Ordinary Way' of Legislating
37(3)
The Lawmaking Process: The Absolute and Two-Thirds Majority Provisos
40(2)
An `Independent' Judiciary
42(1)
The Legal Source (?) of Responsible Government
43(1)
II The New South Wales Constitution Act 1855
44(12)
The Purpose and Wording of s.1 [ BAA] of the New South Wales Constitution Act 1855
45(1)
The Purpose (?) and Wording of s.4 [ BAA] of the Constitution Act 1855
46(1)
Debate in the Imperial Parliament
47(1)
The Secretary of State's Despatch
48(1)
A Diversion from s.4 [ BAA]: Mid-Nineteenth-Century Presumptions as to the `Manner' of Lawmaking by the British Parliament
49(1)
... and Back to s.4 [ BAA] ...
50(2)
Another Diversion from s.4 [ BAA]: And Another Mid-Nineteenth-Century Presumption as to (Judicial Regulation of) the `Manner' of Lawmaking by the British Parliament
52(1)
... and Back (again) to s.4 [ BAA] ...
52(1)
The Governor's Commission and Instructions
53(1)
Responsible Government by Implication?
53(2)
Matters Reserved for the Royal Assent
55(1)
III The Law and the Politics of `Dis-Entrenchment'
56(7)
The New South Wales Constitution Act 1857
56(2)
Electoral Reform and Swamping the Council
58(2)
The Electoral Act 1858
60(1)
Robertson's 1861 Land Reforms -- And the First `Swamping'(?) of the Council
60(3)
IV The Creation of Queensland as a Separate Colony
63(4)
The First Queensland Government
65(2)
3 The Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 -- I: Origins
67(34)
I Constitutional Controversies in Early 1860s Queensland -- Lutwyche
68(12)
The Two-Thirds Clauses in the Queensland Constitution -- A Question of when
68(2)
The Initial Electoral Law - And Sir Alfred Lutwyche's View of the Constitution
70(5)
The Pugh Seditious Libel Case
75(2)
Lutwyche's Final Fling
77(3)
II South Australia's Constitutional Crises -- Boothby and Gwynne
80(21)
The First Dismissal Attempt
81(1)
The Torrens Land Act
81(2)
Hutchinson v Leeworthy -- April 1860 -- Judicial Invalidation of `Repugnant' Colonial Statutes
83(2)
Payne v Dench -- April 1861 -- The Constitutionality of the `Court of Appeals'
85(2)
McEllister v Fenn -- June 1861 -- The Invalidity of `Acts' Consented to by the Governor in Breach of his Instructions
87(2)
The First Addresses for Removal and Boothby's `Evidence' to the Assembly
89(3)
McEllister v Fenn (again) -- November 1861 -- The Continued Non-Existence of the Court of Appeals
92(1)
The Imperial Government's Response to the Dismissal Addresses
93(3)
The Controversy Continues and Deepens and Broadens
96(1)
Driffield v Torrens -- December 1862 -- The Entrenchment Proviso in the South Australia Constitution
97(2)
Auld v Murray -- October 1863 -- Assessing the Effect of Validating Legislation
99(1)
The 1864 Validity Petitions
100(1)
4 The Colonial Laws Validity Act 1865 -- II: Policy (?) And Text
101(22)
I Palmer and Collier's Report
101(4)
II The Act -- And its Enactment
105(10)
Parliamentary Consideration -- Or Not -- Of the Bill
105(1)
The Secretary of State's Despatch
106(1)
The Text of the Act: ss.1--5
107(2)
Temporal Effects
109(1)
`Colonial Legislatures' and `Representative Legislatures'
110(1)
The Powers of Colonial and Representative Legislatures
110(2)
... `Such Manner and Form'
112(2)
The Text: s.6
114(1)
The Text: s.7
114(1)
III Meanwhile -- And Afterwards -- On the South Australia Supreme Court
115(6)
The Queen v Neville -- June 1865 -- Criminal Courts and Repugnancy
115(1)
Dawes v Quarrell -- July 1865 -- There are No Local Courts
116(2)
Walsh v Goodall (1865) -- October 1865 -- Gwynne and Boothby on the Construction of the CLVA 1865
118(2)
Not Dismissal, but Amoval -- The End of Boothby's Judicial Career
120(1)
IV Conclusion
121(2)
5 Constitutional Developments In New South Wales And Queensland 1865--1900
123(34)
I The `Two-Thirds' Clauses in the Queensland Constitution Act 1867
123(10)
Putting -- Or Keeping -- Them in: The Queensland Constitution Act 1867
124(3)
Taking (One of) them Out -- The Constitution Act Amendment Act 1871
127(1)
Lilley's `Singular Omission' Analysis of the Special Majority Clauses
128(1)
The Amended Bill -- Repealing s.10; Retaining s.9
129(2)
Electoral Reform or Not
131(2)
II Queensland -- Griffith and McIlwraith
133(11)
Points of Division in a `No-Party System'
134(1)
Political and Legal Dimensions of Assembly Council Relations
135(4)
Swamping or Radical Reform of Queensland's Legislative Council?
139(2)
To the Left ... to the Right ... to the Court ... the Final Steps of Griffith's (Party) Political Career
141(3)
III New South Wales -- Parkes
144(5)
Assembly-Council Relations
145(2)
The Emergence and Consolidation of a Formal Party System
147(2)
IV Towards Australian Federation?
149(8)
Colonial Legislatures have Plenary, Not Delegated Powers -- The Apollo Candle (and Burah) Litigation
150(3)
The Immediate Origins of Federation
153(4)
6 Australian Confederation
157(53)
I The Terms of Federation
157(9)
The Commonwealth Parliament
158(1)
The Composition of the House of Representatives and the Senate
158(1)
Parliament's Powers
158(1)
Deadlock Provisos
159(1)
Disallowance and Reservation
160(1)
The National Government
160(1)
State Autonomy
161(1)
`Fiscal' Autonomy
162(1)
The High Court
163(1)
The Constitutional Amendment Process
164(1)
The Continuing Significance of the CLVA 1865?
165(1)
II Party Political Alignments in the Commonwealth Parliament in Early Twentieth-century Australia
166(6)
The 1901 Election
167(1)
The Judiciary Act 1903 and the First High Court Judges
168(1)
The Rise and Fall and Rise and Fall and Rise and Fall of the Deakin and Labour Governments
169(3)
III In the High Court and Privy Council -- The Implied Immunity of Instrumentalities Doctrine
172(29)
In re the Income Tax Acts (No 4); Wollaston's Case
172(1)
An American Diversion -- The Judgment in McCulloch v Maryland
173(2)
On Judges as Jurists -- McCulloch in the Privy Council
175(2)
On Judges as Statesmen
177(2)
Wollaston's Case in the State Supreme Court
179(1)
Counsel and Submissions
179(2)
The Judgment
181(1)
D'Emden v Pedder
182(1)
In the State Supreme Court
183(1)
Counsel and Submissions
183(1)
The Judgment
184(1)
In the High Court
185(1)
Counsel and Submissions
185(1)
Judgment
186(2)
Deakin v Webb
188(1)
In the Victoria Supreme Court
189(1)
Judgment
189(1)
In the High Court
189(2)
Webb v Outtrim (Outtrim's Case)
191(1)
The Privy Council Bench
191(1)
Counsel
192(1)
Judgment
193(2)
Railway Servants
195(1)
The High Court's Judgment
195(1)
Baxter v Commissioners of Taxation
196(3)
An Uneasy Settlement?
199(1)
The Harvester Judgment and the Constitutionality of New Protection'
200(1)
The Constitutionality of the Excise Tariff Act 1906
201(1)
IV Conclusion
201(9)
The New South Wales Constitution Act 1902
202(4)
The Reduction of Members Referendum Act 1903
206(1)
The Reduction of Members Referendum Bill
206(2)
The Australian States Constitution Act 1907
208(2)
7 Constitutional Controversy In Queensland: Kidston And Cooper
210(29)
I William Kidston and the Politics of Progressive Coalition
211(3)
II Income Tax and the Judges -- The Cooper Litigation
214(14)
In the Lower Queensland Courts
219(2)
In the Queensland Supreme Court
221(1)
In the High Court
222(1)
Counsel and Submissions
222(1)
Judgment
222(6)
III The Constitution Act Amendment Act 1908 and the Parliamentary Bills Referendum Act 1908
228(10)
The Constitution Act Amendment Act 1908
229(1)
In the Assembly
230(2)
In the Council
232(1)
The Parliamentary Bills Referendum Act 1908
233(1)
In the Assembly
233(3)
In the Council
236(2)
IV Conclusion
238(1)
8 Constitutional Controversy In Queensland: Ryan And Taylor
239(28)
I Abolishing the Queensland Legislative Council?
240(10)
Ryan, Hughes and Conscription -- Round 1
241(1)
The Legislative Council Abolition Bill
242(1)
The First Conscription Referendum and Hughes's Desertion of the Labour Party
243(2)
The Legislative Council Abolition Referendum
245(1)
Duncan v Theodore -- At Trial before Pope Cooper
246(1)
The Background to Duncan v Theodore
247(1)
Cooper's Judgment
248(2)
II Taylor in the Queensland Courts
250(9)
Counsel and Submissions
250(3)
Judgment
253(2)
The State Supreme Court's Judgment in Duncan v Theodore
255(1)
The High Court's Judgment in Duncan v Theodore
256(1)
The Judges
256(1)
The Judgments
257(2)
III Taylor in the High Court
259(8)
Counsel and Submissions
259(3)
The Judgments in Taylor
262(2)
Ryan, Hughes and Conscription -- Round 2
264(3)
9 Constitutional Controversy In Queensland: Ryan, Theodore And Mccawley In The Queensland Courts
267(13)
I In the Queensland Courts
269(7)
`Counsel' and `Submissions'
269(3)
The Judges
272(1)
The `Judgment'
272(4)
II Regularising the Proceedings
276(2)
The 1918 Assembly Election
277(1)
III Taylor before the Privy Council
278(2)
10 Constitutional Controversy In Queensland: Ryan, Theodore And Mccawley -- In The High Court
280(25)
I The Hearing
280(2)
II The Majority Judgments
282(6)
Griffith
283(2)
Barton
285(2)
Gavan Duffy
287(1)
Powers
287(1)
III The Dissenting Judgments
288(10)
Isaacs and Rich
288(1)
On the CLVA 1865 s.5
289(4)
On the 1855 Act, the 1859 Order and the 1867 Act
293(1)
On Empirical Inconveniences and Logical Inconsistencies
294(2)
On Cooper
296(1)
On the Validity of the Commission and the Meaning of `Five Years' Standing'
296(1)
Higgins
297(1)
Conclusion
298(1)
IV Abolition of the Legislative Council and the 1919 National Election
298(7)
Abolishing Queensland's Legislative Council?
299(3)
The 1919 National Election
302(3)
11 Constitutional Controversies In Queensland: Ryan, Theodore And Mccawley -- Before The Privy Council
305(34)
I The Hearing
305(3)
The Judges -- A Court of Statesmen, Not Jurists?
305(1)
Counsel and Submissions
306(2)
II The Judgment
308(7)
Answered Questions
308(5)
An Unanswered Question?
313(1)
The Meaning (and Vires) of the Commission
314(1)
Reaction(s) in Queensland
314(1)
III The Eventual Abolition of the Queensland Legislative Council
315(15)
The Judges' Retirement Act 1921
319(1)
In the Assembly
319(4)
In the Council
323(1)
The Labour Party's (1921) `Socialisation Objective'
324(1)
The Legislative Council Abolition Legislation
325(1)
In the Assembly
325(2)
In the Council
327(2)
The `New' Supreme Court
329(1)
IV National Developments
330(6)
A Judicial Rebalancing of Commonwealth-State Constitutional Relations? The Engineers Case and the Implied Immunity of Instrumentalities Doctrine
330(3)
Deposing Hughes
333(1)
A Political Rebalancing of Commonwealth-State Financial Relations? Control of the Note Issue and the Creation of the Loan Council
334(2)
V An Opportunity Not Taken -- Or Not Realised?
336(3)
McCawley -- An Unanswered (and Unasked) Question
337(2)
Bibliography 339(4)
Index 343
Ian Loveland is Professor of Public Law at City, University of London, UK.