Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

McCawley and Trethowan - The Chaos of Politics and the Integrity of Law - Volume 2: Trethowan [Hardback]

(City, University of London, UK)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 216 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm, weight: 476 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 29-Jul-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509948279
  • ISBN-13: 9781509948277
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 96,25 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Standarta cena: 113,24 €
  • Ietaupiet 15%
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 216 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm, weight: 476 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 29-Jul-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Hart Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 1509948279
  • ISBN-13: 9781509948277
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

In the second part of this two-volume study, Ian Loveland delves deeply into the immediate historical and political context of the Trethowan litigation which began in New South Wales in 1930 and reached the Privy Council two years later. The litigation centred on the efforts of a conservatively-inclined government to prevent a future Labour administration led by the then radical politician Jack Lang abolishing the upper house of the State's legislature by entrenching the existence of the upper house through the legal device of requiring that its abolition be approved by a state-wide referendum.

The book carefully examines the immediate political and legal routes of the entrenchment device fashioned by the State's Premier Sir Thomas Bavin and his former law student, colleague and then Dean of the Sydney University law school Sir John Peden, and places the doctrinal arguments advanced in subsequent litigation in the State courts, before the High Court and finally in the Privy Council in the multiple contexts of the personal and policy based disputes which pervaded both the State and national political arenas.

In its final chapter, the book draws on insights provided by the detailed study of McCawley (in volume one) and Trethowan to revisit and re-evaluate the respective positions adopted by William Wade and Ivor Jennings as to the capacity of the United Kingdom's Parliament to introduce entrenching legislation which would be upheld by the courts.

Papildus informācija

This book presents a detailed contextual study of one of the most familiar cases in both British and Commonwealth constitutional history: Trethowan v The Attorney General for New South Wales.
Preface v
Acknowledgements vii
Brief Contents ix
Abbreviations xv
Table of Cases
xvii
Table of Legislation
xxi
1 The Immediate Political Roots Of The Trethowan Controversy
1(24)
I Fact and Faction in New South Wales Party Politics During the First World War and its Aftermath
1(8)
Holman's `National' Government(s)
4(1)
The Storey and Dooley-led Labour Parties
5(3)
A Judicial Clarification of Commonwealth-State Constitutional Relations?
8(1)
II Jack Lang and the New South Wales Labour `Party' in the Early- to Mid-1920s
9(16)
The First Lang Government's Policy Programme - And the Legislative Council's Response
13(2)
The `Constitutionality' of `Swamping' the Legislative Council
15(2)
The 1926 Abolition Bill
17(2)
Lang's `Coups'
19(1)
The Newspaper Tax
20(3)
The End of the First Lang Government
23(2)
2 The Immediate Legal Roots Of The Trethowan Controversy
25(24)
I Lang in Opposition(s) 1927-30
25(7)
To Bavin in New South Wales
26(1)
To the Bruce/Page Commonwealth Governments
26(4)
To the Labour Commonwealth Government
30(2)
II The Constitution (Legislative Council) Amendment Act 1929
32(17)
The Text of the Act
34(6)
Debate in the Council
40(4)
Debate in the Assembly
44(3)
The Constitution Further Amendment (Referendum) Act 1930
47(2)
3 Trethowan In The New South Wales Courts
49(22)
I The `Big Fella' Returns: The 1930 Election
49(3)
The New Government's Plans for the Legislative Council
50(2)
II The Trethowan Hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court
52(8)
The Court
54(1)
Counsel
55(2)
Submissions
57(3)
III The Judgment
60(7)
Street CJ's Judgment
60(6)
Conclusion
66(1)
IV Reaction to the Judgment
67(4)
Evatt and McTiernan to the High Court; and Isaacs as Governor-General
68(3)
4 Trethowan Before The High Court
71(25)
I The Hearing
72(6)
The Court
72(1)
Counsel and Submissions
73(5)
II To the Right and to the Left: The Incipient Collapse of Scullin's Government
78(1)
`Lang Labour' in the Commonwealth Parliament
79(1)
III The Judgments
79(10)
Gavan Duffy CJ
80(1)
McTiernan J
81(3)
Rich J
84(1)
Starke J
85(1)
Dixon J
85(2)
Reactions to the Judgment
87(1)
Implementing (?) the Lang Plan
88(1)
IV The Fall of the Scullin Government
89(7)
Lang Labour: Repudiation; Consolidation; Isolation
90(1)
The United Australia Party
90(1)
The Premiers' Plan
91(1)
Theodore and Lang (and Personality and Politics), and the End of Scullin's Government
92(1)
The 1931 Commonwealth Election
93(1)
The Lyons Government's Financial Agreements Enforcement Act 1932
94(2)
5 Trethowan Before The Privy Council
96(20)
I The Validity of the Financial Agreements Enforcement Act 1932
97(3)
The Majority Opinions
98(1)
In Dissent
98(1)
Consequences
99(1)
II The Trethowan Hearing
100(4)
The Judges
100(2)
Counsel
102(1)
Submissions
103(1)
III The End of the Second Lang Government
104(7)
The Mortgages Taxation Bill
105(1)
Lang's April Circular and Lyons's May Proclamations
106(3)
The `Constitutionality' of the Dismissal
109(2)
IV The Trethowan Judgment
111(5)
Reactions in New South Wales
114(2)
6 Aftermaths
116(17)
I The 1932 New South Wales Election
116(14)
After the Election - Reforming the Legislative Council
118(1)
The Deadlock Provisions in (the Amended) s.5 of the Constitution Act 1902
119(2)
In the Legislative Council
121(2)
In the Legislative Assembly
123(2)
The Referendum
125(1)
`Lang's' Legal Challenges to the Reform
125(1)
Piddington v Attorney-General
125(2)
Doyle v Attorney-General
127(1)
The First `Elected' Legislative Council
128(1)
Entrenching Abolition in Queensland
129(1)
II The End of Lang's Political Careers?
130(3)
7 Still Not Abolishing The New South Wales Legislative Council
133(18)
I Heffron's Abolition Initiative
133(2)
II Clayton v Heffron in the State Courts
135(6)
The Judges
136(1)
The Majority Judgments
137(1)
Evatt and Sugerman
137(2)
Herron and McLelland
139(1)
In Dissent
140(1)
Conclusion
140(1)
III Clayton v Heffron in the High Court
141(10)
The Majority Opinion
141(5)
The Dissenting Opinion
146(1)
The Concurring Opinions
147(2)
Conclusion
149(2)
8 Uses - And Abuses - Of The Trethowan Principle
151(30)
I An Entrenchment Problem
152(7)
II Entrenchment in the UK Context: Presumptions - Orthodox and Unorthodox - On Legal Enforceability
159(20)
Common Law Constitutionalism as an `Entrenchment' Device
159(5)
Orthodox Views on the Legal Enforceability of a Statutory Entrenchment Device
164(1)
The Enrolled Bill Rule Cases
165(1)
The Implied Repeal Cases
166(1)
The Wade Analysis
167(1)
The Relevance of Miller (No 2)
168(2)
And Unorthodox Views on the Legal Enforceability of a Statutory Entrenchment Device
170(1)
The Enrolled Bill Rule Cases
171(1)
The Implied Repeal Cases
172(1)
The Jennings (and Wade) Analyses
173(2)
The (ir)relevance of Miller (No 2)
175(1)
On Symmetry and Asymmetry in Entrenchment Devices
176(1)
Transactional Symmetry
176(1)
Contextual Symmetry
177(2)
III Conclusion
179(2)
Bibliography 181(4)
Index 185
Ian Loveland is Professor of Public Law at City, University of London, UK.