Preface |
|
v | |
Acknowledgements |
|
vii | |
Brief Contents |
|
ix | |
Abbreviations |
|
xv | |
|
|
xvii | |
|
|
xxi | |
|
1 The Immediate Political Roots Of The Trethowan Controversy |
|
|
1 | (24) |
|
I Fact and Faction in New South Wales Party Politics During the First World War and its Aftermath |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
Holman's `National' Government(s) |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
The Storey and Dooley-led Labour Parties |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
A Judicial Clarification of Commonwealth-State Constitutional Relations? |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
II Jack Lang and the New South Wales Labour `Party' in the Early- to Mid-1920s |
|
|
9 | (16) |
|
The First Lang Government's Policy Programme - And the Legislative Council's Response |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
The `Constitutionality' of `Swamping' the Legislative Council |
|
|
15 | (2) |
|
|
17 | (2) |
|
|
19 | (1) |
|
|
20 | (3) |
|
The End of the First Lang Government |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
2 The Immediate Legal Roots Of The Trethowan Controversy |
|
|
25 | (24) |
|
I Lang in Opposition(s) 1927-30 |
|
|
25 | (7) |
|
To Bavin in New South Wales |
|
|
26 | (1) |
|
To the Bruce/Page Commonwealth Governments |
|
|
26 | (4) |
|
To the Labour Commonwealth Government |
|
|
30 | (2) |
|
II The Constitution (Legislative Council) Amendment Act 1929 |
|
|
32 | (17) |
|
|
34 | (6) |
|
|
40 | (4) |
|
|
44 | (3) |
|
The Constitution Further Amendment (Referendum) Act 1930 |
|
|
47 | (2) |
|
3 Trethowan In The New South Wales Courts |
|
|
49 | (22) |
|
I The `Big Fella' Returns: The 1930 Election |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
The New Government's Plans for the Legislative Council |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
II The Trethowan Hearing in the New South Wales Supreme Court |
|
|
52 | (8) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
|
57 | (3) |
|
|
60 | (7) |
|
|
60 | (6) |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
IV Reaction to the Judgment |
|
|
67 | (4) |
|
Evatt and McTiernan to the High Court; and Isaacs as Governor-General |
|
|
68 | (3) |
|
4 Trethowan Before The High Court |
|
|
71 | (25) |
|
|
72 | (6) |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
|
73 | (5) |
|
II To the Right and to the Left: The Incipient Collapse of Scullin's Government |
|
|
78 | (1) |
|
`Lang Labour' in the Commonwealth Parliament |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
79 | (10) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
|
81 | (3) |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (2) |
|
Reactions to the Judgment |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
Implementing (?) the Lang Plan |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
IV The Fall of the Scullin Government |
|
|
89 | (7) |
|
Lang Labour: Repudiation; Consolidation; Isolation |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
The United Australia Party |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
|
91 | (1) |
|
Theodore and Lang (and Personality and Politics), and the End of Scullin's Government |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
The 1931 Commonwealth Election |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
The Lyons Government's Financial Agreements Enforcement Act 1932 |
|
|
94 | (2) |
|
5 Trethowan Before The Privy Council |
|
|
96 | (20) |
|
I The Validity of the Financial Agreements Enforcement Act 1932 |
|
|
97 | (3) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
98 | (1) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (4) |
|
|
100 | (2) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
III The End of the Second Lang Government |
|
|
104 | (7) |
|
The Mortgages Taxation Bill |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
Lang's April Circular and Lyons's May Proclamations |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
The `Constitutionality' of the Dismissal |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
IV The Trethowan Judgment |
|
|
111 | (5) |
|
Reactions in New South Wales |
|
|
114 | (2) |
|
|
116 | (17) |
|
I The 1932 New South Wales Election |
|
|
116 | (14) |
|
After the Election - Reforming the Legislative Council |
|
|
118 | (1) |
|
The Deadlock Provisions in (the Amended) s.5 of the Constitution Act 1902 |
|
|
119 | (2) |
|
In the Legislative Council |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
In the Legislative Assembly |
|
|
123 | (2) |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
`Lang's' Legal Challenges to the Reform |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
Piddington v Attorney-General |
|
|
125 | (2) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
The First `Elected' Legislative Council |
|
|
128 | (1) |
|
Entrenching Abolition in Queensland |
|
|
129 | (1) |
|
II The End of Lang's Political Careers? |
|
|
130 | (3) |
|
7 Still Not Abolishing The New South Wales Legislative Council |
|
|
133 | (18) |
|
I Heffron's Abolition Initiative |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
II Clayton v Heffron in the State Courts |
|
|
135 | (6) |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
|
139 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
|
140 | (1) |
|
III Clayton v Heffron in the High Court |
|
|
141 | (10) |
|
|
141 | (5) |
|
|
146 | (1) |
|
|
147 | (2) |
|
|
149 | (2) |
|
8 Uses - And Abuses - Of The Trethowan Principle |
|
|
151 | (30) |
|
I An Entrenchment Problem |
|
|
152 | (7) |
|
II Entrenchment in the UK Context: Presumptions - Orthodox and Unorthodox - On Legal Enforceability |
|
|
159 | (20) |
|
Common Law Constitutionalism as an `Entrenchment' Device |
|
|
159 | (5) |
|
Orthodox Views on the Legal Enforceability of a Statutory Entrenchment Device |
|
|
164 | (1) |
|
The Enrolled Bill Rule Cases |
|
|
165 | (1) |
|
|
166 | (1) |
|
|
167 | (1) |
|
The Relevance of Miller (No 2) |
|
|
168 | (2) |
|
And Unorthodox Views on the Legal Enforceability of a Statutory Entrenchment Device |
|
|
170 | (1) |
|
The Enrolled Bill Rule Cases |
|
|
171 | (1) |
|
|
172 | (1) |
|
The Jennings (and Wade) Analyses |
|
|
173 | (2) |
|
The (ir)relevance of Miller (No 2) |
|
|
175 | (1) |
|
On Symmetry and Asymmetry in Entrenchment Devices |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
176 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (2) |
|
|
179 | (2) |
Bibliography |
|
181 | (4) |
Index |
|
185 | |