This smart, inventive, and fastidiously researched book makes a case for a new relationship among meter, genre, and literary periodization in English poetryWeiskott is a metricist and philologist of omnivorous learningThe new formalism exemplified by Weiskott requires far more thoughtfulness than the old New Criticism; it requires a far greater knowledge than the New Historicism..[ S]cholarship at its most exact and provocative. (Studies in the Age of Chaucer) Meter and Modernity in English Verse...is an argument against the accepted periodization that would draw a firm line between the 'medieval' and the 'modern.' It is a pitch on behalf of an English genre that lasted from the mid-fifteenth to the mid seventeenth century, political prophecy in verse. And it is an account of the major metrical traditions in English from the mid-thirteenth to the twentieth century...[ A]n endeavor that shines a light on verse practice and raises the stakes of metrical enquiry.
(Modern Philology) Eric Weiskott has written a searching, ambitious book with significant implications for our thinking about literary-historical time. Besides its obvious relevance to scholars studying poetics across later Middle English and early modern English, Meter and Modernity should also engage a wider range of readers. It investigates how verse-craft in any time might relate to human experience, and to regional, national, and transnational cultural formation. The book also, though, explores how we organise literary research and teaching. It would be good, and also a fitting implementation of the thrust of Weiskott's arguments, if scholars who think of themselves as working on periods other than "the medieval" read this book...[ The book] lays out a new landscape of value for early English literature.
(English Studies) Weiskott brings decades of metrical scholarship on prosody into focus to demystify pentameter's prestige. With deep linguistic and archival knowledge, his book writes new plural histories of English verse forms for early periods in which there is little explicit poetics or meta-prosodic reflection...His book answers the pressing need for poetics to find rigorous methods for moving between time periods with truly divergent and non-'modern' literary cultures...Weiskott marries archival, philological, metrical, and disciplinary awareness in what should be required reading for all medievalists and prosodists. (Modern Language Review) In Meter and Modernity in English Verse, Eric Weiskott offers a stunning example of metrical inquiry at its finest in a study of a neglected genre that, from its modest corner of the literary world, poses daring and difficult questions about how we organize knowledge in a 'virtual field of play both constraining and responsive to the continuous history of cultural decision-making' In the process, Weiskott presents an alternative history of literature free from the warping effects of periodization. Gracefully blending Bourdieuan theory with linguistic and archival evidence, Weiskott recenters a marginalized genrethe political prophecyamong intersecting metrical cultures in England from the fourteenth to the seventeenth century. Exquisite codicological analysis complements precise philological reasoning in a probing audit of the methods of historical-literary scholarship. Through three parts and eleven chapters, Weiskott mounts an erudite, even soulful interrogation of the limitations of periodization on our understanding of, and relationship to and with, the dynamic practices of early English metrical communities. (Arthuriana) [ A] timely intervention in the intellectual project of rethinking the medieval-modern divide in literary and cultural history...Written with lucidity, intellectual breadth, and philological rigor, Meter and Modernity demonstrates that medieval and modern are inadequate terms to think about meter. (Renaissance Quartlery) Eric Weiskott saves us from reading the history of English poetry as a narrative in which formal, thematic, and linguistic developments keep step across a progress of periods. Meter, in its own diversity-the asynchronous rise and fall of its many kinds-proves to be an ideal instrument for disaggregating the rates and durations of change across many domains. (Jeff Dolven, Princeton University)
