Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Of Mice and Primates: Virtue Ethics and Animal Research [Hardback]

(Professor of Philosophy and Professor Social Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 208 pages, height x width x depth: 226x152x23 mm, weight: 454 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 09-Sep-2025
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 0190089954
  • ISBN-13: 9780190089955
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts: Hardback, 208 pages, height x width x depth: 226x152x23 mm, weight: 454 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 09-Sep-2025
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press Inc
  • ISBN-10: 0190089954
  • ISBN-13: 9780190089955
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
The ethics of research on animals has historically been viewed through the lens of cost vs benefit, and whether animals have rights. Is the suffering that might be experienced by animals-and the violation of their rights, if they are seen to have any-worth the gain in scientific knowledge? Many experiments that have caused great animal suffering were ethically justified in this way. Rebecca Walker here argues against this paradigm, and advocates instead for a virtue ethics approach. She argues that what is missing from the traditional approach to animal research are issues of character, context, and relationships. What is problematic in much research on animals is less a violation of rights than a lack of care for the vulnerable; and that most philosophical approaches to animal research ignore the actual practice of that research. Different ethical questions thus arise when viewed through this lens, such as: does a researcher who develops relationships with her animal subjects owe them a greater duty of care? What is the moral significance of the psychological effects on the researcher of doing that research? Can, or should, a rhesus monkey, for example, used for research live a good life when it is housed in a research facility?

Of Mice and Primates addresses these and other questions by reorienting our moral concern about animal research, and offers a moral theory focused on what actually happens in research settings.

Moral theory has primarily approached questions in animal ethics using utilitarian and rights-based theories. When applied to ethical questions in animal research, these theories typically yield conclusions about whether, or when, such animal uses are morally permissible. Rebecca Walker here argues for an alternative approach using virtue ethics, a moral perspective with roots in ancient Greek philosophy, to consider the ethical questions that arise within the very practice of laboratory animal research. Focused on questions of how we ought to live, what it means to flourish, and how virtues and vices yield practical moral guidance, Walker's use of virtue ethics yields important new insights into animal research ethics.
Chapter 1: Why (not) virtue ethics?
Chapter 2: Rights and Welfare: A Case Study
Chapter 3: Animal Flourishing and the Lab
Chapter 4: Friendship, Human-Animal Bonds, and Partiality in the Lab
Chapter 5: Virtue, Vice, and the Other Animals: Compassion
Chapter 6: Justice and Animal Research Oversight
Chapter 7: Intellectual Virtues for Animal Science
Chapter 8: Limitations and Further Thoughts on Moral Status
Rebecca Walker is a professor of philosophy and of social medicine at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Her work in philosophy of medicine addresses animal ethics, health justice, genomic ethics, and bioethics theories and concepts. She engages both philosophical and social science methodologies and she has published widely in prominent bioethics, science, philosophy, and medicine journals. Her co-edited books include Working Virtue: Virtue Ethics and Contemporary Moral Problems (2007); Understanding Health Inequalities and Justice (2016); and the two volume Social Medicine Reader (2019).