Preface to the Third Edition |
|
x | |
|
|
1 | (8) |
|
Modern History of Molecular Modeling |
|
|
2 | (1) |
|
Do Today's Molecular Modeling Methods Only Make Pictures of the Lukretian World or Do They Make Anything More? |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
What are Models Used For? |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
Molecular Modeling Uses all Four Kinds for Model Building |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (3) |
|
|
9 | (84) |
|
Generation of 3D Coordinates |
|
|
9 | (7) |
|
|
9 | (1) |
|
|
10 | (2) |
|
Conversion of 2D Structural Data into 3D Form |
|
|
12 | (3) |
|
|
15 | (1) |
|
Computational Tools for Geometry Optimization |
|
|
16 | (16) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
|
19 | (2) |
|
Energy-minimizing Procedures |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
Use of Charges, Solvation Effects |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
Quantum Mechanical Methods |
|
|
24 | (5) |
|
|
29 | (3) |
|
|
32 | (18) |
|
Conformational Analysis Using Systematic Search Procedures |
|
|
34 | (3) |
|
Conformational Analysis Using Monte Carlo Methods |
|
|
37 | (2) |
|
Conformational Analysis Using Molecular Dynamics |
|
|
39 | (5) |
|
Which Is the Method of Choice? |
|
|
44 | (2) |
|
|
46 | (4) |
|
Determination of Molecular Interaction Potentials |
|
|
50 | (19) |
|
Molecular Electrostatic Potentials (MEPs) |
|
|
50 | (7) |
|
Molecular Interaction Fields |
|
|
57 | (9) |
|
Display of Properties on a Molecular Surface |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
|
66 | (3) |
|
|
69 | (8) |
|
Pharmacophore Identification |
|
|
70 | (1) |
|
|
70 | (2) |
|
Atom-by-atom Superposition |
|
|
72 | (2) |
|
Superposition of Molecular Fields |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
|
77 | (16) |
|
|
77 | (4) |
|
Other CoMFA-related Methods |
|
|
81 | (2) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
Reliability of 3D QSAR Models |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
|
87 | (4) |
|
|
91 | (2) |
|
A Case Study for Small Molecule Modeling: Dopamine D3 Receptor Antagonists |
|
|
93 | (18) |
|
A Pharmacophore Model for Dopamine D3 Receptor Antagonists |
|
|
93 | (11) |
|
The Aromatic--Basic Fragment |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
The Aromatic--Amidic Residue |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
Molecular Interaction Fields |
|
|
102 | (2) |
|
|
104 | (7) |
|
Variable Reduction and PLS Model |
|
|
104 | (3) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
Prediction of External Ligands |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
Introduction to Comparative Protein Modeling |
|
|
111 | (70) |
|
Where and How to Get Information on Proteins |
|
|
111 | (5) |
|
|
115 | (1) |
|
Terminology and Principles of Protein Structure |
|
|
116 | (10) |
|
Conformational Properties of Proteins |
|
|
116 | (3) |
|
Types of Secondary Structural Elements |
|
|
119 | (3) |
|
|
122 | (2) |
|
|
124 | (2) |
|
Comparative Protein Modeling |
|
|
126 | (23) |
|
Procedures for Sequence Alignments |
|
|
127 | (6) |
|
Determination and Generation of Structurally Conserved Regions (SCRs) |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
Construction of Structurally Variable Regions (SVRs) |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (2) |
|
Distance Geometry Approach |
|
|
138 | (1) |
|
Secondary Structure Prediction |
|
|
139 | (2) |
|
|
141 | (3) |
|
|
144 | (5) |
|
Optimization Procedures -- Model Refinement -- Molecular Dynamics |
|
|
149 | (9) |
|
Force Fields for Protein Modeling |
|
|
149 | (1) |
|
|
150 | (1) |
|
The Use of Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Model Refinement |
|
|
151 | (2) |
|
Treatment of Solvated Systems |
|
|
153 | (2) |
|
Ligand-binding Site Complexes |
|
|
155 | (1) |
|
|
155 | (3) |
|
Validation of Protein Models |
|
|
158 | (15) |
|
|
158 | (6) |
|
|
164 | (2) |
|
|
166 | (3) |
|
|
169 | (4) |
|
|
173 | (8) |
|
|
173 | (4) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
177 | (1) |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
Virtual Screening and Docking |
|
|
181 | (36) |
|
Preparation of the Partners |
|
|
181 | (8) |
|
Preparation of the Compound Library |
|
|
181 | (5) |
|
Representation of Proteins and Ligands |
|
|
186 | (3) |
|
|
189 | (7) |
|
Incremental Construction Methods |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
|
192 | (2) |
|
Simulated Annealing and Monte Carlo Simulations |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
196 | (4) |
|
Empirical Scoring Functions |
|
|
196 | (2) |
|
Force-field-based Scoring Functions |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Knowledge-based Scoring Functions |
|
|
198 | (1) |
|
Critical Overview of Fast Scoring Functions |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
Postfiltering Virtual Screening Results |
|
|
200 | (2) |
|
Filtering by Topological Properties |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Filtering by Consensus Mining Approaches |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
Filtering by Combining Computational Procedures |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Filtering by Chemical Diversity |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
Filtering by Visual Inspection |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Comparison of Different Docking and Scoring Methods |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
Examples of Successful Virtual Screening Studies |
|
|
203 | (3) |
|
|
206 | (11) |
|
|
207 | (10) |
|
Scope and Limits of Molecular Docking |
|
|
217 | (16) |
|
Docking in the Polar Active Site that Contains Water Molecules |
|
|
218 | (7) |
|
Including Cofactor in Docking? |
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
Impact of Tautomerism on Docking |
|
|
227 | (6) |
|
|
229 | (2) |
|
|
231 | (2) |
|
Chemogenomic Approaches to Rational Drug Design |
|
|
233 | (32) |
|
Description of Ligand and Target Spaces |
|
|
235 | (7) |
|
|
236 | (2) |
|
|
238 | (2) |
|
|
240 | (2) |
|
Ligand-based Chemogenomic Approaches |
|
|
242 | (7) |
|
Annotating Ligand Libraries |
|
|
242 | (2) |
|
|
244 | (2) |
|
Ligand-based In silico Screening |
|
|
246 | (3) |
|
Target-based Chemogenomic Approaches |
|
|
249 | (5) |
|
Sequence-based Comparisons |
|
|
249 | (2) |
|
Structure-based Comparisons |
|
|
251 | (3) |
|
Target-Ligand-based Chemogenomic Approaches |
|
|
254 | (4) |
|
Chemical Annotation of Target Binding Sites |
|
|
254 | (2) |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
Three-dimensional Searches |
|
|
256 | (2) |
|
|
258 | (7) |
|
|
258 | (7) |
|
A Case Study for Protein Modeling: the Nuclear Hormone Receptor CAR as an Example for Comparative Modeling and the Analysis of Protein-Ligand Complexes |
|
|
265 | (34) |
|
The Biochemical and Pharmacological Description of the Problem |
|
|
265 | (3) |
|
Nuclear Hormone Receptor Superfamily |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
Molecular Architecture and Activation Mechanisms of Nuclear Hormone Receptors |
|
|
265 | (2) |
|
The Human Constitutive Active Androstan Receptor (CAR) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
Comparative Modeling of the Human Nuclear Hormone Receptor CAR |
|
|
268 | (4) |
|
Choosing Appropriate Template Structures |
|
|
269 | (2) |
|
Homology Modeling of the Human CAR |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
Setting up the System for the Molecular Dynamics Simulations |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
Analysis of the Models that Emerged from MD Simulations |
|
|
272 | (7) |
|
|
272 | (3) |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
Deciphering the Structural Basis for Constitutive Activity of Human CAR |
|
|
276 | (2) |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
|
279 | (5) |
|
Identifying Important Amino Acids for CAR Activation |
|
|
279 | (3) |
|
MD Simulations of Selected CAR Mutants |
|
|
282 | (2) |
|
Modeling of CAR-Ligand Complexes |
|
|
284 | (2) |
|
The CAR X-ray Structure Comes into Play |
|
|
286 | (6) |
|
How Accurate is the Generated CAR Model? |
|
|
286 | (2) |
|
Docking Studies Using the CAR X-ray Structure |
|
|
288 | (1) |
|
The Basis for Constitutive Activity Revisited |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
Virtual Screening for Novel CAR Activators |
|
|
292 | (3) |
|
|
295 | (4) |
|
|
296 | (3) |
Index |
|
299 | |