Preface |
|
xi | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xv | |
Author Biography |
|
xvii | |
|
1 Criminal Justice Systems in the United States |
|
|
1 | (24) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.2 Crime: Definition, Classification, and Costs |
|
|
1 | (2) |
|
|
3 | (1) |
|
1.4 Criminal Justice Systems: Definition, Laws, Resources, and Processes |
|
|
3 | (2) |
|
1.5 Data Relating to Criminal Justice in the United States |
|
|
5 | (13) |
|
1.5.1 Data and Models for Decision Making |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
1.5.2 The United Crime Reporting Program, the Summary Reporting System, and Crime Rates |
|
|
8 | (5) |
|
1.5.3 Data on the Solving of Crimes |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
1.5.4 The National Incidence-Based Reporting System, the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Program, and the Hate Crime Statistics Program |
|
|
14 | (4) |
|
1.6 Data Comparing Criminal Justice in the United States to Other Countries |
|
|
18 | (4) |
|
1.7 Issues Associated with Criminal Justice Systems in the United States |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
1.8 Summary and a Look Forward |
|
|
23 | (2) |
|
2 Analytics and Criminal Justice Systems |
|
|
25 | (34) |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2 Decisions Associated with Criminal Justice Systems and Why They Are Difficult to Make |
|
|
25 | (9) |
|
2.2.1 Decisions in General |
|
|
25 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Decision Makers and Stakeholders for Criminal Justice Systems |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
2.2.3 Decisions for Criminal Justice Systems |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Analytics and Operations Research |
|
|
29 | (2) |
|
2.2.5 Complexities Which Make Decisions Difficult for Criminal Justice Systems |
|
|
31 | (3) |
|
2.3 Analytic Methodologies for Dealing with Criminal Justice Systems |
|
|
34 | (21) |
|
2.3.1 Problem Structuring Methods |
|
|
34 | (2) |
|
2.3.1.1 An Illustrative Example of Problem Structuring for Juvenile Crime |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
2.3.2 Generating Multiple Objectives and Multiple Performance Measures for a Decision Situation |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.3.2.1 An Illustrative Example: Determining Objectives and Performance Measures for Setting Up a Syringe Exchange Program |
|
|
40 | (7) |
|
2.3.3 Cost-Benefit Analysis |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
2.3.4 Multiattribute Value Functions and Multiattribute Utility Functions |
|
|
48 | (2) |
|
2.3.4.1 An Illustrative Example: Using a Multiattribute Utility Function for the Decision of Whether to Use a Court-Appointed Attorney |
|
|
50 | (4) |
|
2.3.5 Simulation Modeling and Analysis |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
2.4 A Review of Selected Applications of Analytics to Criminal Justice Systems |
|
|
55 | (4) |
|
3 Using Multiple Objective Analytics to Address Issues Associated with Criminal Justice Systems |
|
|
59 | (40) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
3.2 Privatization of Prisons |
|
|
60 | (15) |
|
3.2.1 Data on Prisons and the Motivation for Privatization |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Advantages and Disadvantages of Privatization |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Democrats vs. Republicans with Respect to Privatization |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
3.2.4 The Literature on Private vs. Public Prisons |
|
|
62 | (4) |
|
3.2.5 An Illustrative Example: Development of a Multiattribute Value Function to Compare Prisons |
|
|
66 | (1) |
|
3.2.5.1 Determination of Objectives and Attributes |
|
|
66 | (5) |
|
3.2.5.2 Assessment of the MAV Function |
|
|
71 | (3) |
|
3.2.5.3 Ranking Proposals from Private Companies |
|
|
74 | (1) |
|
|
75 | (24) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Difficulties Associated with the Current Bail Process |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Trends in Bail Reform |
|
|
77 | (2) |
|
3.3.4 Advantages and Disadvantages of Keeping a Defendant Incarcerated Prior to Trial |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
3.3.5 Current Approaches and Suggestions for the Bail Process |
|
|
80 | (3) |
|
3.3.6 A Multiple Objective, Decision Theoretic Model for Selection of Pretrial Conditions |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3.3.6.2 Alternatives and Process Description |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
3.3.6.3 Input Parameters, Probabilities, and Control Variables for the Model |
|
|
86 | (3) |
|
3.3.6.4 Attributes for the Multiattribute Utility Function |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
3.3.6.5 Criterion, Alternatives, Parameters, and Multiattribute Utility Function for the Example |
|
|
90 | (4) |
|
3.3.6.6 The Simulation Model and Results |
|
|
94 | (3) |
|
3.3.6.7 Final Discussion of the Model |
|
|
97 | (2) |
|
4 Using Multiple Objective Analytics to Improve Federal Laws |
|
|
99 | (18) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
4.2 The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 |
|
|
100 | (6) |
|
4.2.1 Impetus for the Law |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
4.2.2 Elements of the Law |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
4.2.3 Implementation Results |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
4.2.4 Detractors and Supporters |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
4.2.5 Motivation of Criminals |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
4.2.6 The Law's Effect on Crime |
|
|
103 | (1) |
|
4.2.7 A Cost-Benefit Analysis of the COPS Program |
|
|
104 | (1) |
|
4.2.8 The Law and Incarceration Rates |
|
|
105 | (1) |
|
4.3 Criminal Justice Reform Act of 2018 (The First Step Act) |
|
|
106 | (11) |
|
4.3.1 Impetus for the Law |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
4.3.2 Provisions of the Law |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Criticisms of the Law |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 The Prisoner Assessment Tool Targeting Estimated Risks and Needs (PATTERN) |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
4.3.5 An Illustrative Example: Optimizing Over Controls for the First Step Act |
|
|
110 | (7) |
References |
|
117 | (16) |
Index |
|
133 | |