The volume discusses what the Turkish Model, or Turkish Development Alternative, was and why it was promoted in the Central Asian republics immediately following the dissolution of the Soviet Union. It argues that the Turkish Model was a myth that transferred the ideal of a ''secular, democratic, liberal society'' as a model for the post Soviet Turkic world and in the process encouraged a ''Turkic" rhetoric that emphasized connection between the two regions based on a common ancestry. The volume begins with an understanding of the reality of the Model from a Turkish perspective and then goes on to examine whether the Turkic world as a "cultural-civilizational alternative" makes sense both from a historical as well as contemporary perspective. It concludes by looking at the re-emergence of the Model in the wake of the events in West Asia in early 2011 and examines how in the light of a search for options the Turkish Model is once again projected as viable.
This book discusses the Turkish Model of a secular, democratic, liberal society for Central Asian states in the post-Soviet era, showing how the volatile nature of subnational and ultranational agendas complicates the formulation of any single model.
| 1 Political Dynamics in Eurasia: Background and Context of the Turkish Model |
|
1 | (24) |
|
|
|
3 | (5) |
|
1.2 Reorienting Geopolitics |
|
|
8 | (5) |
|
1.3 Eurasianism and the "Turkic" Rhetoric |
|
|
13 | (6) |
|
1.4 The Model as a "Myth" |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
|
|
22 | (3) |
| 2 What Is the "Turkish Model?" |
|
25 | (26) |
|
2.1 The Turkish Model as a "Secular" Model |
|
|
26 | (7) |
|
2.2 The Turkish Model as a "Modern" Model |
|
|
33 | (15) |
|
|
|
48 | (3) |
| 3 Confronting the Past |
|
51 | (24) |
|
3.1 Reclaiming Ottoman-Russian Connections and the Ottoman Legacy |
|
|
51 | (1) |
|
3.2 Identities and Linkages |
|
|
52 | (5) |
|
3.3 Some Debates on "Decline" and "Negation": The Ottoman Legacy |
|
|
57 | (7) |
|
3.4 The Making of a "Modern" Identity |
|
|
64 | (4) |
|
3.5 Reemergence of pan-Turkism |
|
|
68 | (4) |
|
|
|
72 | (3) |
| 4 Eurasianism or Neo-Ottomanism: The Neighborhood in Turkish Foreign Policy |
|
75 | (26) |
|
4.1 From pan-Turkism to Eurasianism |
|
|
79 | (8) |
|
4.2 From Eurasianism to Neo-Ottomanism |
|
|
87 | (12) |
|
|
|
99 | (2) |
| 5 The Central Asian Response to "Models" |
|
101 | (28) |
|
5.1 The Emergence of the Republics and Relations with Russia |
|
|
102 | (6) |
|
5.2 "Eastern Turkestan," Kitaiskiy Bazaars, and Central Asian Response to China |
|
|
108 | (7) |
|
5.3 Central Asian Reactions to Turkey and the Turkish Model |
|
|
115 | (9) |
|
5.4 The Gillen Movement and Central Asia |
|
|
124 | (3) |
|
|
|
127 | (2) |
| 6 The Turkish Model at Crossroads |
|
129 | (28) |
|
|
|
135 | (7) |
|
6.2 And the Contradictions Continue |
|
|
142 | (11) |
|
|
|
153 | (4) |
| Select Bibliography |
|
157 | |
Anita Sengupta is Fellow at the Maulana Abul Kalam Azad Institute of Asian Studies, Kolkata, an autonomous institute under the Ministry of Culture, Government of India. Her work at the Institute has been focused on the Eurasian region with Uzbekistan being her area of special interest. She has also worked extensively on Turkish politics. She is the author of Heartlands of Eurasia: The geopolitics of political space, (Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Oxford: Lexington Books July 2009); Russia, China and Multilateralism in Central Asia, (New Delhi: Shipra Publications, 2005); The Formation of the Uzbek Nation-State: A Study in Transition, (Lanham, Boulder, New York, Toronto, Oxford: Lexington Books, 2003) and Frontiers into Borders: The Transformation of Identities in Central Asia, (Delhi and London: Hope India Publications and Greenwich Millennium Press Ltd, 2002). She has also edited a number of volumes on Eurasian politics.Asian Studies and Central Asia and the Caucasus. Her articles have been translated and published in Russian and Chinese. She has been an invited speaker at various national and international seminars.
Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām