Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Nationality of Foundlings: Avoiding Statelessness Among Children of Unknown Parents Under International Nationality Law

  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 130,27 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

This is the first book dedicated to clarifying the concept of “foundlings” and how to best prevent their statelessness in light of the object and purpose of Article 2 of the 1961 UN Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness and equivalent nationality law provisions. Among other features, the book defines the terms “foundling,” including the maximum age limit of the child to be considered a “foundling”; “unknown parents”; being “found” in a territory; and “proof to the contrary”; as well as the procedural issues such as the appropriate burden and standard of proof. In doing so, the book draws upon a comparative analysis of national legislation on “foundlings” covering 193 states, case law, and precedents in some states as well as international human rights law norms including the best interests of the child. As its conclusion, the book proposes an inclusive model “foundling provision” and a commentary to inform legislative efforts and interpretation of the existing provisions. Its findings are useful not only to state parties to the 1961 Convention but also to non-state parties, particularly in countries lacking systematic civil documentation or experiencing the effects of armed conflicts, migration, trafficking, and displacement.

Recenzijas

Mai Kaneko-Iwase's publication Nationality of Foundlings is an essential contribution filling gaps in understanding of international law and State practice in granting nationality to children found in a States territory. (Betsy L Fisher, Statelessness & Citizenship Review, Vol. 4 (1), 2022)

1 Introduction 1(30)
1.1 Why Foundlings?
2(3)
1.2 Objective
5(1)
1.3 Research Questions
6(1)
1.4 Working Hypothesis to Be Verified in Chaps. 3 and 6: Foundling is a Child of Unknown Parentage
7(1)
1.5 Research Methodology and Limitation
8(20)
1.5.1 Languages
9(1)
1.5.2 Literature Review and Further Research
9(6)
1.5.3 Consideration Over the Possibility of Systematic Comparative Review and Ideal Focus Countries
15(1)
1.5.4 Adjusted Approach and Eventual Countries with Relative Details Included
16(4)
1.5.5 Significance of Practice by Non-state Parties
20(8)
1.6 Qualitative Rather than Quantitative Research
28(1)
1.7 Structure
28(3)
2 Nationality, Statelessness, Family Relationships, Documentation and Foundlings 31(46)
2.1 Statelessness Around the World and Efforts to Address Statelessness
31(4)
2.2 Right to Nationality Under International Law
35(2)
2.3 Domestic Rules for Acquisition and Loss of Nationality
37(1)
2.4 International Legal Framework to Address Statelessness
37(6)
2.4.1 Developments Towards Adoption of the 1961 Convention
40(2)
2.4.2 Relevance of UNHCR Guidance
42(1)
2.5 Stateless Person Definition and Interpretation
43(1)
2.6 The Definition of Being 'considered a national'
44(2)
2.7 Notes on Other Related Concepts
46(5)
2.7.1 De Facto Stateless Persons
46(4)
2.7.2 Persons of Undetermined Nationality
50(1)
2.7.3 Persons at Risk of Statelessness
51(1)
2.8 Causes of Statelessness Including Foundlinghood
51(1)
2.9 Documentation of Birth, Parentage and Nationality
52(8)
2.9.1 Lack of Documentation is Not Equivalent to Statelessness
53(2)
2.9.2 When Establishing Nationality Without Documents Becomes Difficult
55(2)
2.9.3 Late Birth Registration as a Measure to Prevent Statelessness Arising from Lack of Documentation
57(1)
2.9.4 Lack of Documentation of Parentage and Having Unknown Parents
57(2)
2.9.5 Where Foundling Provisions Are Correct Solutions
59(1)
2.10 Family Law and Nationality
60(17)
2.10.1 Distinction Between 'factual parent' and 'legal parent'
60(2)
2.10.2 Legal Descent Under Family Law to Be Determined Before Nationality by Jus Sanguinis
62(1)
2.10.3 Legal Parentage Under Family Law Vis-a-Vis Under Nationality Law
62(2)
2.10.4 Relevance of the Law of Parentage
64(1)
2.10.5 Establishment of Legal Parentage in Cases of Natural Reproduction
65(5)
2.10.6 Establishment of Legal Parentage for Surrogacy Cases
70(2)
2.10.7 Private International Law on Parentage and Conflict of Laws in Surrogacy Cases
72(5)
3 Defining a 'Foundling' 77(38)
3.1 'Found' in the territory: The Condition for Granting Nationality-Not Part of Who a Foundling Is
78(1)
3.2 Lack of an Established Definition of a 'Foundling'-Available 'Definitions'
78(3)
3.3 Language Analysis
81(6)
3.3.1 The Term 'foundling'-Is It Used in Domestic Nationality Legislation in English?
82(2)
3.3.2 'Foundling' in Five Other UN Official Language Versions of the 1961 Convention and Domestic Nationality Laws
84(2)
3.3.3 Observations Based on the Text of the 1961 Convention and Legislation in Different Languages
86(1)
3.4 Evolution of the Foundling Provision within International and Regional Instruments
87(16)
3.4.1 Codification of Nationality Legislation Principle into the 1930 and 1961 Conventions: 'Foundling provision' More Common than 'Otherwise stateless' Persons Provision
87(1)
3.4.2 The 1930 Hague Convention
88(6)
3.4.3 1949 UN Study of Statelessness
94(1)
3.4.4 ILC Study on Nationality Including Statelessness and Draft Conventions
95(1)
3.4.5 ILC Draft Conventions on Reduction of Future Statelessness and Denmark's Proposal
95(4)
3.4.6 The 1961 Convention
99(1)
3.4.7 A Child of Unknown Parents Born in the Territory: Left Between Article 1 and Article 2?-'merger' with 'a foundling found in the territory'
100(2)
3.4.8 ECN and Its Explanatory Report
102(1)
3.5 The Overall Difference Between 'persons of unknown parentage' and Other 'persons otherwise stateless'
103(1)
3.6 Does a 'foundling' Need to Have Been Intentionally 'abandoned' and Passively 'found' on the Territory?
104(2)
3.7 The Distinction Between 'children of unknown parents', 'foundlings' and 'otherwise stateless persons' Within Domestic Nationality Laws
106(4)
3.7.1 (1) Children of Unknown Parents, (2) Foundlings and (3) Otherwise Stateless Persons Distinguished
106(1)
3.7.2 (1) Children of Unknown Parents 'born or found' Distinguished From (3) Otherwise Stateless Persons
107(1)
3.7.3 (1) Children of Unknown Parents Included in (2) Foundling Concept
108(1)
3.7.4 (1) Children of Unknown Parents Grouped Together with (3) Otherwise Stateless Persons
108(1)
3.7.5 No Nationality Grant (in Principle) to (2) Foundlings Whose Birth in the Territory is Not Established
109(1)
3.8 Persons Who Fall Through the Crack of the 1961 Convention and ECN: Persons of Known Parentage of Unknown Birthplace, Otherwise Stateless
110(1)
3.9 Summary and Conclusions: A Foundling is of 'unknown parentage'
111(4)
4 Defining 'Unknown-ness' of Parentage 115(62)
4.1 Note on the Statistical Information
116(1)
4.2 One Parent or Both Parents Unknown?
117(1)
4.3 Categories of Persons Considered to Be of 'unknown parents' Under National Foundling Provisions
118(40)
4.3.1 Babies Abandoned on Streets and Other Places
118(2)
4.3.2 Baby Boxes or Baby Hatches
120(4)
4.3.3 Babies Entrusted or Surrendered to a Third Person
124(3)
4.3.4 Persons Who Suffer Memory Loss or Are Mentally Disabled Whose Parents Thus Cannot Be Identified
127(2)
4.3.5 Children Informally Adopted and Raised by Unrelated Adults
129(8)
4.3.6 New-Born Babies Left Behind at a Hospital by Biological Mothers (of Foreign Appearance)
137(6)
4.3.7 Orphans
143(1)
4.3.8 Runaway Child
144(1)
4.3.9 A Person of Undocumented Parentage
145(2)
4.3.10 Children Born Through Anonymous Birth Scheme
147(5)
4.3.11 Persons Whose Mothers Go Missing After Registering Their Birth with Invalid or Incomplete Identity Information
152(3)
4.3.12 A Person Whose Biological Father is Definitively Known But Has Not Legally Recognized His Paternity Thus is Unknown (Not a Foundling as Mother is Known But Stateless)
155(3)
4.4 Legally Unknown v. Factually Unknown Parents-The Former Matters
158(3)
4.4.1 Need to Consider International Private Law
160(1)
4.5 Persons Without Legal Parents as a Result of Surrogacy Arrangements: Applicability of Foundling (Unknown Parentage) Provisions?
161(10)
4.6 Alternative Avenues of Nationality Grant via Adoption, Institutional Care, Facilitated Naturalization or Late Birth Registration
171(3)
4.7 Summary and Conclusions: 'unknown parents' Mean They Do Not Legally Exist or Their Existence is Not Proven
174(3)
5 Burden and Standard of Proof in Determining Unknown-ness of Parentage 177(54)
5.1 Lack of International Standards on the Burden and Standard of Proof in Establishing the Applicability of the Foundling Provision
178(2)
5.2 Applicability of the UNHCR Evidentiary Standards for 'otherwise-statelessness asessment' to the Foundling Related Assessment
180(4)
5.3 Burden and Standard of Proof-Irrelevant in Administrative Procedures?
184(1)
5.4 The Applicant's Duty to Cooperate and the Non-adversarial Nature of the Procedure
185(1)
5.5 Need for Clarification of Evidentiary Terms and Concepts
185(9)
5.5.1 Burden of Proof
186(3)
5.5.2 Standard of Proof
189(5)
5.6 State Practice on the Burden and the Standard of Proof in Determining Unknown Parentage
194(24)
5.6.1 US
194(8)
5.6.2 The Philippines
202(3)
5.6.3 Japan
205(13)
5.7 Undetermined Nationality: Cannot Be an Outcome of State's Assessment
218(1)
5.8 What is 'a reasonable time' for the Classification 'undetermined nationality', that is for the Assessment of a Foundling Provision Applicability?
219(8)
5.8.1 Is a 'five years' Standard for 'otherwise statelessness' Period Not Too Long?
221(2)
5.8.2 Applicability of the 'five years' Standard to Assessment Under Article 2, the Foundling Provision
223(4)
5.9 Summary and Conclusions
227(4)
6 Age of a Foundling, and Being 'Found' in the Territory 231(36)
6.1 Ordinary Meaning
232(3)
6.2 UNHCR and Other International Standards
235(1)
6.3 Overview of 139 States' Foundling Provisions in Terms of Age (Annex 1)
236(9)
6.3.1 'Birth in the territory' Required
237(1)
6.3.2 'New-born'
237(1)
6.3.3 Older Children (3-15 Years Old)
238(1)
6.3.4 All 'minors' (Non-exhaustive)
239(5)
6.3.5 No Age Specified
244(1)
6.4 The Actual Implementation of the Legislation Limiting Foundlings' Age
245(8)
6.5 What is the Definition of Being 'found' and Who Can 'find' the Person?
253(1)
6.6 What is the Age Above Which One Should Be Able to Secure Evidence of Stay in the Country?
254(1)
6.7 Are the Rationale for Low Age Limitation Justified?
255(6)
6.7.1 Rationales Presented by States
255(2)
6.7.2 Rationale 1: Do Older Children Know Their Parents' Identity or Their Birthplace?
257(1)
6.7.3 Rationale 2: Is It Justifiable to Include 'presumption of birth' in the Definition of Being 'found'?
258(2)
6.7.4 A Foundling is Any Child Under the Age of Majority
260(1)
6.8 'Not having been born outside the territory'-Is It Part of the 'found' Definition?
261(1)
6.9 Burden and Standard of Proof in Establishing Having Been Found (Under the Applicable Age Limitation)
262(1)
6.10 Summary and Conclusions: A Foundling Can Be Found by Any Third Party While a Minor
263(4)
7 'Proof to the Contrary' and Conditions for Nationality Withdrawal 267(66)
7.1 Temporal Scope of 'in the absence of proof to the contrary': Pre Facto and Post Facto Assessment
268(1)
7.2 Structure of Article 2 and What 'to the contrary' Qualifies (Prerequisite or Presumed Facts?)
269(2)
7.3 Travaux Discussions on What Constitutes Proof to the Contrary
271(14)
7.3.1 Discovery of Birth Abroad Pre Facto (And Post Facto)
271(14)
7.4 The Formulation of the Domestic Foundling Provisions and the Proof to 'the contrary'
285(3)
7.5 Selected National Legislation and Practice on the 'proof to the contrary'
288(15)
7.6 Post Facto Withdrawal of Nationality
303(22)
7.6.1 1961 Convention and Related International Standards
303(13)
7.6.2 Analysis of Legislation on Post Facto Withdrawal
316(9)
7.7 Burden and Standard of Proof in Proving the 'contrary' and the Grounds for Withdrawal
325(2)
7.8 Summary and Conclusions: Possession of Another Nationality to Constitute 'the contrary' and the Withdrawal Ground
327(6)
7.8.1 Pre Facto Assessment to Confirm Acquisition of Nationality
327(4)
7.8.2 Post Facto Assessment-Conditions for Nationality Withdrawal
331(2)
8 Recommendations-Model Foundling Provision 333(18)
8.1 Short Review of Chaps. 1-7
333(2)
8.2 Previous Discussions on a Model Founding Provision
335(1)
8.3 Model Foundling Provision
336(12)
8.3.1 'Whose legal parentage'
336(1)
8.3.2 'Cannot be proven'
337(2)
8.3.3 'Found' (in the Territory)
339(1)
8.3.4 'Child'
340(1)
8.3.5 'Shall acquire nationality' (of the State Where Found)
341(2)
8.3.6 'Unless her or his possession of a foreign nationality is proven'
343(1)
8.3.7 'Reasonable time' to Determine the Eligibility for Nationality
344(1)
8.3.8 Regulating Nationality Withdrawal to Avoid Arbitrary Deprivation of Nationality
345(3)
8.4 Alternative Avenues of Nationality Grant Via Adoption or Other Means
348(1)
8.5 Final Remarks Including Notes for Future Research
348(3)
Annex 1: Comparative Table of Legislation on the Nationality of Foundlings of 193 UN Member States 351(56)
Annex 2: Foundling Provisions as of 1953 (Non-exhaustive) 407(2)
Bibliography 409(32)
Index 441
Dr Mai Kaneko-Iwase, a researcher at Maastricht University, the Netherlands, studied international human rights law at the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University in New York where she obtained her masters degree in 2004. She was awarded a PhD (Law) from the Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Maastricht University in January 2020. Starting in 2004, Dr Kaneko-Iwase has worked for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) primarily in Japan, but also in Pakistan, Lebanon and Malaysia. This book was written by the author purely in her personal capacity. The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not reflect the views of the UN or UNHCR.