|
|
1 | (10) |
|
|
10 | (1) |
|
2 Alternative Formulas for Selected Indices |
|
|
11 | (8) |
|
|
16 | (3) |
|
3 Overview of the "Difference of Means" Framework |
|
|
19 | (8) |
|
3.1 Index Formulas: The Current State of Affairs |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
3.2 The Difference of Means Formulation --- The General Approach |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
3.3 Additional Preliminary Remarks on Implementation |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
4 Difference of Means Formulations for Selected Indices |
|
|
27 | (18) |
|
4.1 Scoring Residential Outcomes (y) for the Delta or Dissimilarity Index (D) |
|
|
27 | (4) |
|
4.2 Scoring Residential Outcomes (y) for the Gini Index (G) |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
4.3 The Delta or Dissimilarity Index (D) as a Crude Version of G |
|
|
32 | (1) |
|
4.4 Scoring Residential Outcomes (y) for the Separation Index (S) |
|
|
33 | (3) |
|
4.5 A Side Comment on the Separation Index (S) and Uneven Distribution |
|
|
36 | (3) |
|
4.6 Scoring Residential Outcomes (y) for the Theil Index (H) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
4.7 Scoring Residential Outcomes (y) for the Hutchens Square Root Index (R) |
|
|
40 | (3) |
|
|
43 | (2) |
|
5 Index Differences in Registering Area Group Proportions |
|
|
45 | (12) |
|
5.1 Segregation as Group Differences in Individual Residential Attainments |
|
|
46 | (6) |
|
5.2 Implications for Sensitivity to Separation and Polarization |
|
|
52 | (4) |
|
|
56 | (1) |
|
6 Empirical Relationships Among Indices |
|
|
57 | (20) |
|
6.1 When Do Indices Agree? When Can They Disagree? |
|
|
61 | (10) |
|
6.2 Why Does Relative Group Size Matter? |
|
|
71 | (4) |
|
|
75 | (2) |
|
7 Distinctions Between Displacement and Separation |
|
|
77 | (40) |
|
7.1 The Increasing Practical Importance of the Distinction Between Displacement and Separation |
|
|
79 | (2) |
|
7.2 Prototypical Segregation and Concentrated Versus Dispersed Displacement |
|
|
81 | (5) |
|
7.2.1 Prototypical Segregation |
|
|
82 | (4) |
|
7.3 Clarifying the Logical Potential for D-S Concordance and Discordance --- Analysis of Exchanges |
|
|
86 | (11) |
|
7.3.1 Overview of D-S Differences in Responding to Integration-Promoting Exchanges |
|
|
88 | (2) |
|
7.3.2 Examples of D-S Differences in Responding to Integration-Promoting Exchanges |
|
|
90 | (5) |
|
7.3.3 Implications of Analysis of Example Exchanges |
|
|
95 | (2) |
|
7.4 Clarifying the Potential for D-S Concordance and Discordance --- Analytic Models |
|
|
97 | (11) |
|
7.4.1 Examples of Calculating Values of SMin Given Values of D and P |
|
|
100 | (5) |
|
7.4.2 Examining D, SMax, and SMin over Varying Combinations of D and P |
|
|
105 | (3) |
|
7.4.3 Implications of Findings from Analytic Models for SMax and SMm |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
7.5 Is Separation a Distinct Dimension of Segregation? |
|
|
108 | (7) |
|
|
115 | (2) |
|
8 Further Comments on Differences Between Displacement and Separation |
|
|
117 | (22) |
|
8.1 Revisiting the Empirical Relationships of Displacement (D) and Separation (S) |
|
|
118 | (4) |
|
8.2 Scenarios for How D and S Discrepancies Can Arise |
|
|
122 | (5) |
|
8.3 A Practical Issue When Comparing D and S --- Size of Spatial Units |
|
|
127 | (9) |
|
8.3.1 A Case Study of White-Black Segregation Cullman County Alabama |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
8.3.2 A Case Study of White-Minority Segregation inPalaciosTX |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
8.3.3 Reiterating the Importance of Using "Right-Sized" Spatial Units |
|
|
133 | (2) |
|
8.3.4 More Practical Guidance for Using S |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
8.4 A Simple Index of Polarization |
|
|
136 | (1) |
|
|
137 | (2) |
|
9 Unifying Micro-level and Macro-level Analyses of Segregation |
|
|
139 | (42) |
|
9.1 New Ways to Work with Detailed Summary File Tabulations |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
|
142 | (4) |
|
|
146 | (2) |
|
9.4 Opportunities to Perform Standardization and Components Analysis |
|
|
148 | (2) |
|
9.5 Comparison with Previous Approaches to "Taking Account" of Non-racial Social Characteristics |
|
|
150 | (2) |
|
9.6 Aggregate-Level Controls for Micro-level Determinants of Residential Outcomes |
|
|
152 | (4) |
|
9.7 New Interpretations of Index Scores Based on Bivariate Regression Analysis |
|
|
156 | (5) |
|
9.8 Multivariate Segregation Attainment Analysis (SAA) |
|
|
161 | (9) |
|
9.9 Unifying Aggregate Segregation Studies and Studies of Individual-Level Residential Attainment |
|
|
170 | (2) |
|
9.10 New Possibilities for Investigating Segregation Using Restricted Data |
|
|
172 | (2) |
|
9.11 An Example Analysis Using Restricted Microdata |
|
|
174 | (4) |
|
|
178 | (3) |
|
10 New Options for Investigating Macro-level Variation in Segregation |
|
|
181 | (10) |
|
10.1 New Specifications for Conducting Comparative and/or Trend Analyses of Segregation |
|
|
181 | (8) |
|
|
189 | (2) |
|
11 Aspatial and Spatial Applications of Indices of Uneven Distribution |
|
|
191 | (4) |
|
|
193 | (2) |
|
12 Relevance of Individual-Level Residential Outcomes for Describing Segregation |
|
|
195 | (12) |
|
12.1 An Example Analysis of Segregation and Exposure to Neighborhood Poverty |
|
|
202 | (5) |
|
13 Relevance of Individual-Level Residential Outcomes for Segregation Theory |
|
|
207 | (4) |
|
|
209 | (2) |
|
14 Index Bias and Current Practices |
|
|
211 | (26) |
|
14.1 Overview of the Issue of Index Bias |
|
|
214 | (8) |
|
14.1.1 Effective Neighborhood Size (ENS): A Further Complication |
|
|
218 | (2) |
|
14.1.2 The Practical Relevance of Variation in Effective Neighborhood Size |
|
|
220 | (1) |
|
14.1.3 Random Distribution Is a Valid, Useful, and Conceptually Desirable Reference Point |
|
|
221 | (1) |
|
14.2 Prevailing Practices for Avoiding Complications Associated with Index Bias |
|
|
222 | (10) |
|
14.2.1 Unwelcome Consequences of Prevailing Practices |
|
|
223 | (4) |
|
14.2.2 Efficacy of Prevailing Practices: Screening Cases on Minority Population Size |
|
|
227 | (2) |
|
14.2.3 Efficacy of Prevailing Practices: Weighting Cases by Minority Population Size |
|
|
229 | (1) |
|
14.2.4 An Aside on Weighting Cases by Minority Population Size |
|
|
230 | (2) |
|
14.2.5 Summing Up Comments on Prevailing Practices |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
14.3 Limitations of Previous Approaches for Dealing Directly with Index Bias |
|
|
232 | (2) |
|
|
234 | (1) |
|
|
235 | (2) |
|
15 New Options for Understanding and Dealing with Index Bias |
|
|
237 | (20) |
|
15.1 The Source of the Initial Insight |
|
|
239 | (3) |
|
15.2 Building on the Initial Insight |
|
|
242 | (1) |
|
15.3 A More Detailed Exposition of Bias in the Separation Index |
|
|
243 | (3) |
|
15.4 Situating This Result and Its Implications in the Difference of Means Framework |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
15.4.1 Expected Distributions of p' and y' Under Random Assignment |
|
|
247 | (1) |
|
15.5 Reviewing a Simple Example in Detail |
|
|
247 | (7) |
|
15.5.1 Additional Reflections on Results Presented in Tables 15.1 and 15.2 |
|
|
253 | (1) |
|
|
254 | (1) |
|
|
254 | (3) |
|
16 Comparing Behavior of Unbiased and Standard Versions of Popular Indices |
|
|
257 | (24) |
|
16.1 Documenting the Attractive Behavior of Unbiased Versions of Indices of Uneven Distribution |
|
|
263 | (5) |
|
16.1.1 Summary of Behavior of Unbiased Indices |
|
|
268 | (1) |
|
16.2 Documenting Additional Desirable Behavior of Unbiased Indices Based on the Difference of Means Formulation |
|
|
268 | (7) |
|
16.3 Conceptual and Practical Issues and Potential Impact on Research |
|
|
275 | (4) |
|
|
279 | (2) |
|
|
281 | (4) |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
|
285 | (48) |
|
Appendix A Summary of Notation and Conventions |
|
|
285 | (3) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
Reference and Comparison Groups (Groups 1 and 2) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
City-Wide Terms for Pairwise Calculations |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
Area-Specific Terms for Pairwise Calculations |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
Terms for Individuals or Households |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
Selected Terms and Conventions Relevant for the Gini Index (G) |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
Selected Terms and Conventions Relevant for the Theil Entropy Index (H) |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
Selected Terms and Conventions Relevant for the Atkinson Index (A) |
|
|
287 | (1) |
|
Appendix B Formulating Indices of Uneven Distribution as Overall Averages of Individual-Level Residential Outcomes |
|
|
288 | (5) |
|
Focusing Attention on Individual-Level Residential Outcomes |
|
|
289 | (3) |
|
Summary of Difference of Means Formulations |
|
|
292 | (1) |
|
Appendix C Establishing the Scaling Functions y = f (p) Needed to Cast the Gini Index (G) and the Dissimilarity Index (D) as Differences of Group Means on Scaled Pairwise Contact |
|
|
293 | (27) |
|
|
294 | (1) |
|
Introducing the Function y = f (p) for the Gini Index (G) |
|
|
295 | (2) |
|
Calculating G as a Difference of Means |
|
|
297 | (1) |
|
Deriving G as a Difference of Means |
|
|
298 | (1) |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
Getting on with the Derivation |
|
|
300 | (8) |
|
The Dissimilarity Index (D) --- A Special Case of the Gini Index (G) |
|
|
308 | (7) |
|
Alternative Graphical Explorations of Relative Rank Position |
|
|
315 | (3) |
|
The Nature of the Y-P Relationship for G |
|
|
318 | (2) |
|
Appendix D Establishing the Scaling Function y = f (p) Needed to Cast the Separation Index (S) as a Difference of Group Means on Scaled Pairwise Contact |
|
|
320 | (7) |
|
|
323 | (3) |
|
Formulation as a Difference of Means |
|
|
326 | (1) |
|
Appendix E Establishing the Scaling Function y = f (p) Needed to Cast the Theil Entropy Index (H) as a Difference of Group Means on Scaled Pairwise Contact |
|
|
327 | (3) |
|
Adjusting the Range to 0--1 |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
|
329 | (1) |
|
Appendix F Establishing the Scaling Function y = f (p) Needed to Cast the Hutchens' Square Root Index (R) as a Difference of Group Means on Scaled Pairwise Contact |
|
|
330 | (3) |
|
Adjusting the Range to 0--1 |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
332 | (1) |
|
|
333 | (1) |
References |
|
333 | |