Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

New Political Economy of Disability: Transnational Networks and Individualised Funding in the Age of Neoliberalism [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 190 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm, weight: 530 g
  • Sērija : Routledge Advances in Disability Studies
  • Izdošanas datums: 23-Feb-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 036748305X
  • ISBN-13: 9780367483050
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 191,26 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Bibliotēkām
  • Formāts: Hardback, 190 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm, weight: 530 g
  • Sērija : Routledge Advances in Disability Studies
  • Izdošanas datums: 23-Feb-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 036748305X
  • ISBN-13: 9780367483050
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
"This book addresses the ways in which individualised, market-based models of disability support provision have been mobilised in and across different countries through cross-national investigation of individualised funding (IF) as an object of neoliberal policy mobility. Combining rich theoretical and interdisciplinary perspectives with extensive empirical research, the book provides a timely examination of the policy processes and mechanisms driving the spread of IF amongst countries at the forefront of disability policy reform. It is argued that IF's mobility is not attributable to neoliberalism alone, but to the complex intersections between neoliberal and emancipatory agendas, and to the transnational networks that have blended the two agendas in new ways in different institutional contexts. The book shows how disability rights struggles have synchronised with neoliberal agendas, which explains IF's propensity to move and mutate between different jurisdictions. Featuring first-hand accounts of the activists and advocates engaged in these struggles, the book illuminates the consequences and risks of the dangerous liaisons and political trade-offs that seemed necessary to get individualised funding on the policy agenda for disabled people. It will be of interest to all scholars and students working in disability studies, social policy, sociology and political science more generally"--

This book addresses the ways in which individualised, market-based models of disability support provision have been mobilised in and across different countries through cross-national investigation of individualised funding (IF) as an object of neoliberal policy mobility.

Combining rich theoretical and interdisciplinary perspectives with extensive empirical research, the book provides a timely examination of the policy processes and mechanisms driving the spread of IF amongst countries at the forefront of disability policy reform. It is argued that IF’s mobility is not attributable to neoliberalism alone but to the complex intersections between neoliberal and emancipatory agendas and to the transnational networks that have blended the two agendas in new ways in different institutional contexts. The book shows how disability rights struggles have synchronised with neoliberal agendas, which explains IF’s propensity to move and mutate between different jurisdictions. Featuring first-hand accounts of the activists and advocates engaged in these struggles, the book illuminates the consequences and risks of the dangerous liaisons and political trade-offs that seemed necessary to get individualised funding on the policy agenda for disabled people.

It will be of interest to all scholars and students working in disability studies, social policy, sociology and political science more generally.

Acknowledgements x
List of abbreviations
xi
Introduction 1(14)
Policy mobility: a new theoretical framework for the study of IF
4(1)
The politics of disability rights, recognition and participation: a new direction for policy mobilities research
5(1)
Studying policy on the move
6(2)
Outline of the book
8(7)
1 Individualised funding: history, theory, practice
15(33)
Historical and intellectual antecedents of individualised funding
15(4)
Uneven geographies of consumer-centred care
19(2)
Individualised funding and consumer choice
21(2)
Disability, mainstream and critical perspectives on Individualised funding
23(1)
Disability rights and citizenship
23(2)
Neoliberalism and individualised funding: the new face of consumerism
25(6)
The policy mobility approach
31(3)
Grassroots agency and global policy mobility
34(3)
Conclusion
37(11)
2 Disability politics and the origins of individualised funding
48(28)
Nancy Fraser's bivalent theory of justice
51(3)
Act one: early mobilisations
54(1)
Early origins of cash payments: mobilisation and development of the personal assistant model in the United States
54(1)
The rise of a disability movement in the United Kingdom
55(2)
Parallel developments in `individualised funding': 1960s--1970s
57(1)
Diverging perspectives on disability, independence and political praxis
58(3)
Act two: disability policy under Thatcher
61(1)
Developments in the UK under Thatcher's rule: mainstreaming and rationing personalised services
61(2)
Cost containment: adding the narratives of key players to debates
63(2)
The independent living movement and the campaign for direct payments
65(1)
Difference and divergence in the campaign for direct payments
66(2)
Hegemonic neoliberalism and disability empowerment: applying Fraser's insights
68(1)
Conclusion
69(7)
3 From Thatcherism to New Labour: individualised funding in an age of `deep' neoliberalisation
76(28)
From disarticulated to `deep' neoliberalism: New Labour and the third way
78(2)
The demise of radical disability politics and the emergence of In Control
80(4)
Early experiments in individualised funding
84(2)
Modernisation, personalisation and the introduction of personal budgets
86(6)
Depoliticising disablement
92(5)
Conclusion
97(7)
4 Self-directed support: a new direction for Scottish social care?
104(16)
Self-directed support in Scotland: proponents and protagonists
105(1)
Self-directed support: a case of Scottish exceptionalism?
106(4)
Personalisation in Glasgow
110(6)
Conclusion
116(4)
5 Transnational advocacy and neoliberal entanglements: individualised funding in post-GFC Scotland
120(17)
Information politics
121(4)
Symbolic politics
125(4)
Leverage politics
129(2)
Accountability politics
131(2)
Conclusion
133(4)
6 New policy, same paradigm: Australia's experiment in individualised funding
137(23)
The NDIS in brief
138(4)
Policy mobility and transnational advocacy: the intermediary role of In Control Australia
142(7)
Consumer rights and collective action in Australian disability politics
149(4)
Conclusion
153(7)
7 Individualised funding and the changing political economy of Australia's `disability marketplace'
160(13)
`Roll-out' neoliberalisation and the institutional architecture of the NDIS
161(4)
`Roll-back `neoliberalisation and the dismantling of public services'
165(4)
Conclusion
169(4)
8 Neoliberalism, transnational advocacy and the politics of disability: final thoughts
173(13)
The bifurcation of disability politics, praxis and scholarship
174(3)
Post-politics revisited: the depolitication and `NGOisation' of disability advocacy
177(3)
Individualised funding in an age of `deep' neoliberalisation
180(2)
Conclusion
182(4)
Index 186
Georgia van Toorn is a political sociologist whose principal interests are in social policy and welfare research, and the political economy of disability and care work. Her research program comprises a series of projects that investigate the politics of social policy reform, the organisation and delivery of social care, and care work in publicly funded social services in which market-oriented principles, processes, vocabularies and mechanisms have been adopted, both in Australia and internationally. Georgia is currently working as a post-doctoral researcher in the Department of Sociology and Social Policy at the University of Sydney, on a study of the history and impacts of Australian sociology.