Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

On Opinions: A Concise Guide to Drafting and Evaluating Dutch Law Legal Opinions [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 210 pages, height x width: 240x165 mm, weight: 367 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Sep-2016
  • Izdevniecība: Eleven International Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 9462367000
  • ISBN-13: 9789462367005
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 80,72 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 210 pages, height x width: 240x165 mm, weight: 367 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 30-Sep-2016
  • Izdevniecība: Eleven International Publishing
  • ISBN-10: 9462367000
  • ISBN-13: 9789462367005
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Entering into a transaction inevitably involves risks, including legal risks. If there is a Dutch connection, there may well be Dutch legal risks. The purpose of a Dutch law opinion is to analyse those risks. The opinion giver, an appropriately qualified legal expert (a lawyer (advocaat), civil-law notary (notaris) or sometimes an in-house lawyer), confirms in the opinion that certain risks do not exist and highlights risks that do. This gives the opinion recipient a basis for determining whether, after weighing up the pros and cons, it is responsible from a Dutch law perspective to enter into the particular transaction. The expert giving an opinion must provide the care required by Dutch law. Since failure in his duty of care may render him liable for damage sustained by the opinion recipient, an opinion giver must know what level of care is required of him. Equally, an opinion recipient must know what level of care it can expect. As luck would have it, legal opinions have largely become standardised and this in turn has had the effect of standardising the opinion giver's duty of care. That duty of care is the subject of this book, which is intended as a practical guide to Dutch law opinions and the various elements that comprise them. Based on practice and with its focus on practice, the guide describes/ analyses which risks will typically be indicated in an opinion and which risks will not, clarifying the level of care an opinion giver must provide and an opinion recipient may expect.
Preface 5(6)
Abbreviations 11(2)
Cited legislation 13(2)
1 The opinion
15(4)
1.1 Introduction; terminology
15(4)
2 The opinion giver's duty of care
19(28)
2.1 Applicable law; choice of law and choice of forum
19(3)
2.2 The duty of care under Dutch law
22(3)
2.3 Broad outline of the duty of care
25(2)
2.4 Broad outline of the content of the duty of care -- customary opinion practice
27(5)
2.5 The scope of the opinion
32(3)
2.6 Task -- legal and fact-finding research, forming an opinion, documentation
35(1)
2.7 Task 1 Legal and fact-finding research
35(6)
2.8 Task 2: Forming an opinion
41(1)
2.9 Task 3: Documenting the opinion -- interpretation
42(5)
3 The preparation and delivery of an opinion
47(6)
3.1 Who gives the opinion?
47(1)
3.2 Preparing the opinion
48(2)
3.3 When is the opinion delivered?
50(1)
3.4 Delivery and escrow
51(2)
4 The form of an opinion
53(12)
4.1 The customary form
53(1)
4.2 The addressee of the opinion
54(1)
4.3 The date of the opinion
55(1)
4.4 The introduction of the opinion
56(1)
4.5 Definitions
57(1)
4.6 Law and choice of law and choice of forum
57(3)
4.7 The reliance paragraph
60(2)
4.8 Signature
62(3)
5 The heart of an opinion
65(16)
5.1 Subject; opinion as a whole
65(3)
5.2 Fact-finding research
68(7)
5.3 Assumptions and qualifications
75(2)
5.4 The authenticity assumption, bankruptcy qualification and no opinion qualification
77(4)
6 Capacity opinions
81(32)
6.1 Introduction
81(1)
6.2 The incorporation opinion -- legal person
81(4)
6.3 The formation opinion - VOF and CV
85(2)
6.4 "Good standing" and "No insolvency" opinions
87(1)
6.5 The corporate power opinion
88(4)
6.6 The corporate action opinion
92(11)
6.7 The validly signed opinion
103(10)
7 Enforceability opinions -- agreements
113(18)
7.1 Introduction
113(1)
7.2 The remedies opinion -- Dutch law
114(9)
7.3 The remedies opinion -- foreign law
123(5)
7.4 The pari passu opinion
128(3)
8 Enforceability opinions -- security rights
131(12)
8.1 Introduction
131(1)
8.2 The valid security opinion
131(12)
9 Enforceability opinions -- shares
143(8)
9.1 Introduction
143(1)
9.2 The validly issued opinion
143(8)
10 Enforceability opinions -- choice of forum and choice for arbitration
151(26)
10.1 Introduction
151(1)
10.2 The jurisdiction opinion -- Dutch court
152(3)
10.3 The jurisdiction opinion -- foreign court
155(6)
10.4 The enforcement of judgments opinion
161(4)
10.5 The arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards opinions -- Dutch arbitration
165(5)
10.6 The arbitration and enforcement of arbitral awards opinions -- foreign arbitration
170(4)
10.7 The no immunity opinion
174(3)
11 Diligence opinions
177(12)
11.1 Introduction
177(1)
11.2 The no violation of law opinion
177(2)
11.3 The no licences opinion
179(3)
11.4 The no registration opinion
182(1)
11.5 The no adverse consequences opinion
183(2)
11.6 The prospectus opinion
185(1)
11.7 "No breach of agreements" and "no violation of judgments" opinions
186(3)
12 Tax opinions
189(4)
12.1 Introduction
189(1)
12.2 The stamp duty opinion
189(1)
12.3 The withholding tax opinion
190(3)
Appendix 193(6)
Index 199
Jan Marten van Dijk is a partner at De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek, whose background and experience in opinion practice spans many years.