Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Penal Theories and Institutions: Lectures at the Collčge de France [Mīkstie vāki]

4.16/5 (32 ratings by Goodreads)
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 352 pages, height x width x depth: 208x134x28 mm, weight: 318 g
  • Sērija : Michel Foucault Lectures at the Collège de France 13
  • Izdošanas datums: 23-Nov-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Picador USA
  • ISBN-10: 1250195128
  • ISBN-13: 9781250195128
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 22,93 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 352 pages, height x width x depth: 208x134x28 mm, weight: 318 g
  • Sērija : Michel Foucault Lectures at the Collège de France 13
  • Izdošanas datums: 23-Nov-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Picador USA
  • ISBN-10: 1250195128
  • ISBN-13: 9781250195128

The thirteenth and final English volume of Michel Foucault’s Lectures at the Collège de France

“What characterizes the act of justice is not resort to a court and to judges; it is not the intervention of magistrates (even if they had to be simple mediators or arbitrators). What characterizes the juridical act, the process or the procedure in the broad sense, is the regulated development of a dispute. And the intervention of judges, their opinion or decision, is only an episode in this development. What defines the juridical order is the way in which one confronts one another, the way in which one struggles. The rule and the struggle, the rule in the struggle, this is the juridical.” —Michel Foucault

The great French philosopher Michel Foucault delivered a series of lectures at the Collège de France from November 1971 to March 1972, entitled Penal Theories and Institutions. Within them, he presented for the first time his approach to the question of power, one that would become the focus of his research up to the writing of Discipline and Punish and beyond. His analysis begins with a detailed account of Richelieu’s repression of the Nu-pieds Revolt (1639–1640) and moves on to show how the apparatus of power developed by the monarchy on this occasion broke with the system of juridical and judicial institutions of the Middle Ages, widening into a “judicial State apparatus”—a “repressive system,” whose function was focused on the confinement of those who challenged its order.

Here, Foucault systematizes his approach to a history of truth which is at the heart of his notion of “knowledge-power,” based on the study of “juridico-political matrices” that he had begun in the previous year’s Lectures on the Will to Know. Available for the first time in English, these lectures are an essential milestone in the development of Foucault’s influential theory of justice and penal law.

Foreword xiii
Francois Ewald
Alessandro Fontana
Translator's Note xix
Rules for Editing the Text xxi
Introduction: Read Everything xxiii
Arnold I. Davidson
One 24 November 1971
1(16)
Methodological principle: analysis of the penal system (penal theory, institutions and practice) to be set in the context of systems of repression in order to throw light on the historical development of moral, sociological, and psychological notions; political crime and common law crime
Historical object: to study the repression of popular riots at the beginning of the seventeenth century in order to trace the birth of the State; the penal ritual deployed by the Chancellor Siguier against the uprising of the Nu-pieds (Barefeet) in Normandy (1639)
The Nu-pieds uprising: an anti-tax riot against a system of power (against the tax collector, against the homes of the wealthy); the attitude of the privileged classes, of members of the Parlement: neutrality, refusal to intervene
Two 1 December 1971
17(20)
Summary of stages
(1) A popular revolt aimed at the State tax system
(2) Evasion of nobility, bourgeoisie, and members of the Parlement
(3) The army as sole guarantor: towards the century of "armed justice"
(a) Royal power introduces the new repressive system
How to do the history of this new repressive system? Objection: earlier existence of the State apparatus of repression
Answer: continuous development of legislative institutions, but break within those concerning justice; on the one hand, attachment to the old system; on the other, production of a new system. In contrast with the post-revolutionary bourgeoisie which, behind the mask of the independence of justice, establishes a unitary repressive system of State, justice, and police at the same time
Return to the Nu-pieds of Normandy. They take on the signs of power and assume its prerogatives
Rejection of the law by the imposition of a law. Rejection of justice as exercise of a justice
The signs of this exercise of power: their name with reference to their "beggary "; their symbolic leader, chimerical personage; their orders "in the name of the King"
The acts committed in this exercise of power (military, administrative, financial, of justice)
Repression is really carried out against a different power
Three 15 December 1971
37(20)
An "armed justice": the repressive tactic as series of circumstantial operations; deferred doubling of the military by the civil: chronological gap between slow intervention by the army and the entry on the scene of the civil power
Analysis in terms of relations of force: formation of an armed repressive apparatus, distinct from the body of the army, controlled by the civil State and not by the privileged - Analysis in terms of politico-military strategy: separation of town and country, of the people and bourgeoisie enabling the violent repression of popular strata, then a punitive treatment of the privileged and members of the Parlement
Analysis in terms of manifestation of power: dramatisation of power hiding the strategy pursued, designating the rebels as enemies of the king, therefore subject to the custom of war, and not as civil delinquents
Each performs his role, and the Chancellor the role not of victor, but as dispenser of justice who discriminates and differentiates between the good and wicked
Four 22 December 1971
57(10)
Reminder: Analysis at three levels of the first episode of repression by armed justice (relations offorce, strategic calculations, manifestations of power)
Development on the basis of the third level: a dramatisation in four acts
(1) Royal p ower designates the population as "social enemy"
(2) The local powers bring their submission but try to limit and moderate royal power: an application of the theory of the three checks
(3) The Chancellor's refusal and his invocation of the Final Judgment in his support: "the good will be rewarded, the wicked will be punished"
(4) The privileged protect themselves by accusing "the low populace" and dividing it into good and wicked
Dramatisation which produces a redistribution of the repressive instruments and powers
Five 12 January 1972
67(18)
I Entry of the civil power into Rouen andformation of the visible body of the State
The Chancellor goes beyond the traditional judicial rules and unites the orders of justice and military force: the State takes on a repressive power
Appearance of that third purely repressive function of the State assured, independently of the King, by the Chancellor (member of the King's Council)
Replacement of royal power and the absent king by a visible body of the State
The fiscal apparatus is doubled by a repressive apparatus
II New forms of control without new institutions
Questioning of local authorities: provisional suspensions
Provisional replacement of local institutions by commissioners
Military measures and system of tax penalties in order to bind the privileged to their engagement
All in all, an unstable system of control which still depends upon feudal structures, anticipating the creation of a specialised repressive State apparatus
Six 19 January 1972
85(16)
A remarkable system of repression for several reasons
I Internal coherence: interplay of differentiated sanctions aiming to break the previous alliances of social groups; financial profit given to the privileged in return for maintenance of order; formation of a third (neither military nor juridical) instance as (juridico-military) administrative instrument of the State, but basic lack of a specific apparatus of repression
II Visible precariousness: differentiated arming (problems of bourgeois militias and popular arming), ruinous intervention by the army; drop in income from property as from tax levies; rent/taxes antinomy; bringing two contradictions into play
III Resolution of the rent/taxes antinomy and stabilisation of the army
From 1640, setting up of a new institution and distinct repressive apparatus within the State apparatus (intendants of justice, police and finance), acting as administrative tribunal and exceptional jurisdiction; establishment of a centralised and local police; a levy on the "dangerous population ", confinement and deportation
Birth of the prison conjointly with birth of capitalism
Seven 26 January 1972
101(10)
The failure of the repression carried out by the Chancellor Seguier and then the Fronde gave rise to the setting up of three new institutions: a centralised justice (intendants of justice); the police; a punitive system by removalfrom the population, confinement, deportation
In response to popular struggles, the repressive penal system produces the notion of delinquency: the penal system-delinquency couple as effect of the repressive system-sedition couple
The new institutions do not replace the feudal institutions, they are juxtaposed to them
The exercise of political power is linked to nascent capitalism
The new repressive system, conceived of as an element ofprotection of the feudal economy, is linked functionally to the development of the capitalist economy
It takes shape in the penal code and will be ratified at the end of the eighteenth century: production of the penality/delinquency coding
Eight 2 February 1972
111(16)
Opposition of the new repressive system to the old one: antagonism between processes which gives rise to the birth of justice as both a specific and a state controlled apparatus
I History of the judicial apparatus in the eighteenth century: political struggles, operational conflicts, and determinant contradictions forged the different discourses of penality, crime, and penal justice. - Need to return to feudal justice and Germanic law
II History of Germanic penal law. The juridical order defined by the rules of the dispute; the act of justice is not organized by reference to the truth, nor by the judicial instance, but through a regulated struggle. - Closure of war by payment of an indemnity (rachat), and not sanction for the offense
The activity ofjudging as risk-taking, the danger of private war producing a system of assurances (oaths, compensations, pledges (gages))
Nine 9 February 1972
127(22)
I History of Germanic penal law (continued): its residues in penal law of the Middle Ages
(A) The accusatory procedure, the diffamatio
(B) The system of proof: a test which determines the winner. The truth is not at stake in the oaths, ordeals, and judicial duel
(C) Private war as modality of law in the Middle Ages. The dispute outside the judicial
II History of the transformation into judicial penal system with public action and establishment of a truth of the crime
(A) Not simply due to the influence of Roman law or Christianity, it is inscribed rather in the interplay of relations of appropriation and relations of force
(B) Criminal justice carries out a significant economic levy and contributes to the circulation of wealth
Elements of this circulation: pledges (gages), dues, fines, confiscation, compensation
Consequences: circulation of wealth and concentration of political power
General remarks: The penal system of the Middle Ages produces its major effects at the level of the levy of goods; the contemporary penal system, at the level of the removal of individuals; comparison: fiscal/carceral, exchange/exclusion, compensation/prisons
Ten 16 February 1972
149(18)
Distinction between medieval pre-State structures and the State apparatuses which replace them
Penal practice in the Middle Ages, which is inserted between civil dispute and violent despoilment, consists in a political-economic correlation; it redistributes property, wealth, and goods: it is the "joust of fortunes"
Fiscalisation of justice. Importance of peace institutions and peace pacts (suspension of acts of private war, pacts, contracts; ritualised development)
Pax et justitia, principle of peace councils. Social warfalls under penality
System of penality linked to the problem of the possession, concentration, and distribution of arms
Crisis of the thirteenth to fourteenth century: toppling offeudalism; call forforeign mercenaries; seigneurs rely on royal justice
Application of a system with an anti-seditious function to the parlementary apparatus and fiscal apparatus
Development of royal justice, as firstform of an institutionalised power, into judicial State apparatus
Eleven 23 February 1972
167(16)
I Endogenous process
The function of peace institutions in the Middle Ages
1 Constitution of a space of justitia guaranteed by the judiciary as public authority
2 Constitution of better assured spnes of taxation which double the procedure
3 Distribution of arms, intervention of force, and formation and development of the professional army
Concentration, centralisation, and virtual State takeover ofjustice
II Exogenous processes
The fourteenth and fifteenth century crises and major social struggles transform justice
Important phenomena
1 The functioning of Parlement as center of every practice of justice
2 The king is justiciar as sovereign
3 Parlement becomes a component of a State apparatus
Twelve 1 March 1972
183(14)
Summary: crises and social struggles of the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries lead to the centralisation of royal power and the setting up of a royal justice which appears in the institution of a Parlement. Three characteristics of State justice: universal, compulsory, delegated
Two other measures
1 The development of cases coming under the king: extension of his jurisdiction with, as effects, a new definition of the kingdom-State and a new dimension of penality for breaches of public order
New domain of penality which sanctions breaking a rule stated by the public power
2 Establishment of royal procurators: extension of their role to indictment, with the consequences that every crime is an offense against the public power, and the king becomes both judge and interested party
Double effect on the functioning of the penal system
(1) Separation of the penal and the civil;
(2) Replacement of war and redress by obedience and punishment
Penality is organised by reference to a political structure
Crime becomes an attack on the public power
Opposition between political crime and common law crime as central component of the penality of the nineteenth century, concealing the political function of the penal system
Thirteen 8 March 1972
197(32)
I After analysis of the function and power relations ofpenal justice in the Middle Ages, studying its knowledge effects: not in the sense of ideological operations, but of production of truth
In Germanic law, the test establishes the superiority of one over the other
In the new penal regime with royal procurators, the inquiry establishes the truth that makes it possible to pass from accusation to sentence
The inquiry as restoration of order
The test is replaced by the truth established by witnesses and writing which records
II Complementary comments
Inquiry and confession (zveu) as privileged sources of the discovery of truth in the new penal regime
Torture's point of insertion
The system of legal proofs. Contrast between inquiry and measure
Measure as the instrument and form of a power of distribution; inquiry as instrument and form of a power of information. Inquiry-bureaucratic system in the Middle Ages
Analysis of the types of extraction of surplus-power
Relation to the 1970-1971 lectures on "the will to know"
Final comment on the appearance of the examination form in the eighteenth-nineteenth century
The birth of the human sciences
Course Summary 229(6)
Ceremony, Theater, and Politics in the Seventeenth Century 235(6)
Course Context 241(38)
Letter from Etienne Balibar to the Editor 279(6)
Foucault and the Historians: The Debate on "Popular Uprisings" 285(18)
Index of Concepts and Notions 303(16)
Index of Names 319