Marshall argues that Charcot is best understood through the lens of dramaturgy. He demonstrates the spatial and temporal implications of Charcots neurological practice as steeped in neo-classical aesthetics and deeply attuned to scenography, showmanship, and stage production. Using convincing evidence drawn from critiques of Charcot, Marshall demonstrates that the power and danger of mixing medicine and theatrics was not lost on Charcots contemporaries. (Maia Woolner, New Books network, newbooksnetwork.com, May, 2018)
Drawing on a range of textual, artistic, architectural, and photographic materials, Marshall offers a vivid analysis of Charcots neurological dramaturgy from the laboratory to the lecture hall. Marshalls compelling study troubles neat distinctions between theatre and medicine, knower and known, rational and irrational, and pathology and health in and beyond the space of Salpźtričre, as theatricality moves center stage in this rich archaeology of neurological practice. (TDR: The Drama Review, Vol. 62 (3), 2018)
This is an erudite cultural history that encompasses medicine, visual art, cultural thinking and theatre in the later decades of the nineteenth century in a thoughtful analysis that integrates these divergent elements fluently. Ambitious in its scope, at the same time the book is highly detailed and impresses with its descriptions of the medical and artistic milieu surrounding major figures. (Peta Tait, Australasian Drama Studies, Vol. 71, 2018)
Translated from French:
Moving through the different sites for the constitution and exercise of the Charcotian dramaturgy, Marshall offers a new course through which to look at the master [ Charcot]s thinking [ Marshall] brings the rich contributions of theatrical theory and art history to the analysis of Charcotian works, illustrated for example by the study of the paintings of the Salpźtričre and their strategic use Overall, Marshalls work is for the cultural historian an interesting immersion in the work and methods of Dr. Charcot, offering a unique perspective on this major neurologist whose immense oeuvre remains even now, by and large, for us yet to discover and study. (Alexandre Klein: H-France Review, Vol. 17 (134), August, 2017)
The potential readership for this new book is quite broad, and interested readers new to the topic will profit, but also those who are familiar with the large literature on Charcot but open to new perspectives will find insightful reading within this very well-organized book. Contemporary neurologists will learn from this analysis and reflect on their own practice and teaching methods with a greater sensitivity to verb and tense as we perform our neurological examinations daily. (Christopher G. Goetz, Brain: A Journal of Neurology, Vol. 140 (6), June, 2017)
