The book deals with post-analytical philosophy of law, which departs from the traditional view which considers philosophical cognition as a sense-making and optimizing activity. It seeks to deconstruct the analytical, both philosophical and legal, narrative to expose it as a collection of schemes which oversimplify the legal and political reality.
Post-analytical philosophy of law departs from the traditional view which considers philosophical cognition merely as a sense-making and optimizing activity. It also questions the apparently universal and objective character of the theorems put forward by existing analytical philosophy. Just like every scientific trend whose name is supplemented with the "post" prefix, it does not break with its past, but rather seeks to critically revisit its established achievements. The main goal of post-analytical philosophy is no longer to impose a conceptual structure upon chaos in the realm of legal and political phenomena. Rather, it seeks to deconstruct the analytical, both philosophical and legal, narrative to expose it as a collection of schemes which oversimplify if not mystify the legal and political reality. This kind of diagnosis paves the way towards the construction of a positive program of post-analytical philosophy of law, which the focus of this book.
| Introduction |
|
7 | (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
Post-Analytical Theory and Philosophy of Law. New Problems, New Research Perspectives? |
|
|
11 | (28) |
|
|
|
Hermeneutic Universalism: A Post-Analytical Inquiry into the Political of Legal Interpretation |
|
|
39 | (18) |
|
|
|
The Concept of Law in the Analytical and Post-Analytical Theory |
|
|
57 | (18) |
|
|
|
Philosophical Premises of the Concept of Systemness of Law in Jerzy Wroblewski's Theory of Interpretation |
|
|
75 | (28) |
|
|
|
Towards Post-Analytical Theory of Law. On the Consequences of Richard Rorty's Metaphilosophy |
|
|
103 | (20) |
|
|
|
Legal Culture as Praxis: Towards Interactionalism |
|
|
123 | (16) |
|
|
|
Is It the End of the Theory of Law? A View from the Polish Perspective |
|
|
139 | (28) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postanalytical Challenges to Legal Education in Poland |
|
|
167 | (12) |
|
|
|
Law After the Death of God. Jurisprudence and Some Assertions of the Contemporary Philosophy |
|
|
179 | |
|
|
Andrzej Bator is Professor at the University of Wroclaw and Head of the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law. In his research, he deals with the problems of analytical theory of law. He has published on the use of a legal norm in the regulation of economic relations, competence in law and jurisprudence, as well as legal theory and philosophy of law.
Zbigniew Pulka is Professor at the University of Wroclaw. After graduating in law in 1977, he has been employed at the University of Wroclaw in the Department of Theory and Philosophy of Law. His main research interests include the concept of the system of law, epistemology of law and methodology of jurisprudence. He is a member of the International Association for the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR) and the Animal Rights Association.
Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām