Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Presumed Guilty: How the Supreme Court Empowered the Police and Subverted Civil Rights [Mīkstie vāki]

4.26/5 (341 ratings by Goodreads)
(University of California, Berkeley, School of Law)
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 384 pages, height x width x depth: 211x140x25 mm, weight: 305 g, Frontispiece and part openers
  • Izdošanas datums: 12-Aug-2022
  • Izdevniecība: WW Norton & Co
  • ISBN-10: 1324091975
  • ISBN-13: 9781324091974
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 22,19 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 384 pages, height x width x depth: 211x140x25 mm, weight: 305 g, Frontispiece and part openers
  • Izdošanas datums: 12-Aug-2022
  • Izdevniecība: WW Norton & Co
  • ISBN-10: 1324091975
  • ISBN-13: 9781324091974
Police are nine times more likely to kill African-American men than they are other Americansin fact, nearly one in every thousand will die at the hands, or under the knee, of an officer. As eminent constitutional scholar Erwin Chemerinsky powerfully argues, this is no accident, but the horrific result of an elaborate body of doctrines that allow the police and, crucially, the courts to presume that suspectsespecially people of colorare guilty before being charged. Today in the United States, much attention is focused on the enormous problems of police violence and racism in law enforcement. Too often, though, that attention fails to place the blame where it most belongs, on the courts, and specifically, on the Supreme Court. A smoking gun of civil rights research, Presumed Guilty presents a groundbreaking, decades-long history of judicial failure in America, revealing how the Supreme Court has enabled racist practices, including profiling and intimidation, and legitimated gross law enforcement excesses that disproportionately affect people of color.

For the greater part of its existence, Chemerinsky shows, deference to and empowerment of the police have been the modi operandi of the Supreme Court. From its conception in the late eighteenth century until the Warren Court in 1953, the Supreme Court rarely ruled against the police, and then only when police conduct was truly shocking. Animating seminal cases and justices from the Courts history, Chemerinskywho has himself litigated cases dealing with police misconduct for decadesshows how the Court has time and again refused to impose constitutional checks on police, all the while deliberately gutting remedies Americans might use to challenge police misconduct.

Finally, in an unprecedented series of landmark rulings in the mid-1950s and 1960s, the pro-defendant Warren Court imposed significant constitutional limits on policing. Yet as Chemerinsky demonstrates, the Warren Court was but a brief historical aberration, a fleeting liberal era that ultimately concluded with Nixons presidency and the ascendance of conservative and originalist justices, whose rulingsin Terry v. Ohio (1968), City of Los Angeles v. Lyons (1983), and Whren v. United States (1996), among other caseshave sanctioned stop-and-frisks, limited suits to reform police departments, and even abetted the use of lethal chokeholds.

Written with a lawyers knowledge and experience, Presumed Guilty definitively proves that an approach to policing that continues to exalt Dirty Harry can be transformed only by a robust court system committed to civil rights. In the tradition of Richard Rothsteins The Color of Law, Presumed Guilty is a necessary intervention into the roiling national debates over racial inequality and reform, creating a history where none was beforeand promising to transform our understanding of the systems that enable police brutality.

Recenzijas

"Stunning... Chemerinsky presents a damning indictment of the Supreme Court... As Chemerinsky declares, the courts record 'from 1986 through the present and likely for years to come, can easily be summarized: The police almost always win....' Aside from the fact that he writes well, Chemerinsky... is also an experienced advocate, having appeared before the court on many occasions, and also having served as a consultant to those police forces who either by choice or necessity have tried to overhaul their practices. He bolsters his argument with examples from his own experiences, and his telling of the cases always starts with the people involved... Chemerinsky details a number of ways state and local governments can and should reform police procedures without having to go to court. Whether the furor unleashed by Black Lives Matter will lead to state and city governments reforming their police departments is yet to be seen, but all lawmakers, in fact all concerned citizens, need to read this book. It is an eloquent and damning indictment not only of horrific police practices, but also of the justices who condoned them and continue to do so." -- Melvin I. Urofsky - New York Times Book Review "Opens our eyes to a critical reason that we continue to have problems of police violence and racism in law enforcement... Chemerinsky masterfully presents his arguments by tying together current events with major Supreme Court decisions that laid the foundation for those conflicts... My criminal procedure students know this to be true. They read another book written by Chemerinsky and his co-author that goes through the cases. In the future, they may be assigned this one as well... Years from now, Americans may ask, Did anyone stand up to the Supreme Court and pull back the curtain? The answer will be Yes. Chemerinsky did just that. Now, it is time for all of us to take a good look." -- Laurie L. Levenson - Los Angeles Review of Books "One of the foremost U.S. Constitutional scholars and Supreme Court analysts, Chemerinsky (dean, Univ. of California, Berkeley, Sch. of Law; The Conservative Assault on the Constitution) cogently demonstrates in this book that the court bears much of the blame for police violence and racism in U.S. law enforcement.... An insightful primer for understanding the judicial decisions that support the United States prevailing authoritarian, paramilitary, racist approach to policing.... A thoughtful, provocative, and instructive must-read for anyone concerned with justice and domestic tranquility." -- Thomas J. Davis, Library Journal, starred review "The veteran legal affairs expert offers a powerful attack on a judiciary committed to advancing the police state . . . [ Chemerinsky] suggests that because the Supreme Court will not restrain the police, state courts can and should invoke state constitutions in order to do so.' Necessary reading for civil libertarians, public defenders, and activists." -- Kirkus Reviews

Preface xi
Part I THE SUPREME COURT, RACE, AND POLICING
1 "I Can't Breathe" Why Courts Can t Stop Police from Using Chokeholds
3(14)
2 Confronting the Realities of Race and Policing
17(6)
3 The Supreme Court's Essential Role In Enforcing the Constitution and Controlling Police
23(16)
Part II A MINIMAL JUDICIAL ROLE The Court and Policing Before 1953
4 Why the Supreme Court Ignored Policing for Much of American History
39(20)
5 Judicial Silence on Constitutional Protections and Remedies Before 1953
59(24)
Part III THE WARREN COURT: Finally Enforcing Constitutional Protections and Remedies
6 "Each Era Finds an Improvement In Law for the Benefit of Mankind" Applying the Bill of Rights to State and Local Police
83(18)
7 Both Limiting and Empowering Police The Warren Court and the Fourth Amendment
101(16)
8 Miranda: Trying to Solve the Problem of Coercion In Police Interrogations
117(8)
9 Protecting the Innocent from Wrongful Convictions Safeguards Against False Eyewitness Identifications
125(6)
10 Rights Need Remedies
131(10)
Part IV RETRENCHMENT: The Burger Court Limits Constitutional Rights
11 "Only the Guilty Have Something to Hide" Undermining Fourth Amendment Protections
141(27)
12 Hollowing Out Miranda
168(6)
13 Refusing to Check Police Eyewitness Identification Procedures
174(10)
14 Eroding Remedies for Police Misconduct
184(25)
Part V EMPOWERING POLICE The Rehnqulst and Roberts Courts
15 The Police Can Stop Anyone, at Any Time, and Search Them
209(22)
16 You Don't Really Have the Right to Remain Silent
231(8)
17 Ignoring the Problem of False Eyewitness Identifications
239(4)
18 The Vanishing Remedies for Police Misconduct
243(32)
Part VI IT CAN BE DONE: Overcoming the Supreme Court to Reform Policing
19 The Path to Meaningful Police Reform
275(34)
Acknowledgments 309(2)
Notes 311(34)
Index 345
Erwin Chemerinsky is the dean of the University of California, Berkeley, School of Law. The author of Presumed Guilty, The Conservative Assault on the Constitution, and The Case Against the Supreme Court, among many other works, he lives in Oakland, California.