Preface |
|
xv | |
|
|
xvi | |
|
|
xvii | |
|
|
1 | (10) |
|
PART I THREE PROPERTY ASPECTS OF IP LAW |
|
|
11 | (62) |
|
2 Property in Justifying Rights |
|
|
13 | (29) |
|
|
13 | (2) |
|
A Utilitarian Justification Grounds |
|
|
15 | (13) |
|
1 The Tragedy of the Commons v. the Tragedy of the Free Rider |
|
|
15 | (6) |
|
2 Trademarks and Trade Secrets |
|
|
21 | (2) |
|
|
23 | (1) |
|
4 The Doctrine of Property v. Liability (and Inalienability) Rules |
|
|
24 | (2) |
|
5 The Notion of Modularity in Property Law |
|
|
26 | (2) |
|
|
28 | (1) |
|
1 Locke and the Notion of "Moral Desert" |
|
|
28 | (5) |
|
2 Alternative Readings of Locke |
|
|
33 | (2) |
|
3 The Labor Idea as a Justification for Modern IP |
|
|
35 | (1) |
|
C Personality and Personhood Ideas |
|
|
35 | (4) |
|
|
39 | (3) |
|
3 Property in the Structuring of Rights |
|
|
42 | (26) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
A The Role of Thingness in Property |
|
|
43 | (3) |
|
B The Notion of IP as Intangibles |
|
|
46 | (5) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
2 Revealing the Nature of Intangible IP: The Scandinavian Post-WWII Discussion and Beyond |
|
|
47 | (4) |
|
C The Structural Particularities of Various IP Rights |
|
|
51 | (4) |
|
D The Object Function in IP Law: Distinction between Concrete Object and Legal Object (Rights in Rem) |
|
|
55 | (5) |
|
|
60 | (1) |
|
F The Concepts of Resource and Information in Relation to IP |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
1 The Concept of Resource in Relation to IP |
|
|
61 | (1) |
|
2 The Concept of Information in Relation to IP |
|
|
62 | (1) |
|
G Exclusive Rights and Remuneration Rights in IP Law |
|
|
63 | (3) |
|
H Conclusion: On Property in the Structuring of Rights |
|
|
66 | (2) |
|
|
68 | (5) |
|
PART II IMPLICATIONS OF THE THREE ASPECTS OF PROPERTY |
|
|
73 | (129) |
|
5 Conclusions to Be Drawn from the Justification of Rights |
|
|
75 | (19) |
|
|
75 | (1) |
|
A Conclusions Drawn from Common Grounds of Justification |
|
|
76 | (10) |
|
|
76 | (4) |
|
|
80 | (4) |
|
|
84 | (2) |
|
B Problems with Different Justification Grounds |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
C Justifying IP in the International Context |
|
|
87 | (6) |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
6 Conclusions to Be Drawn from the Structure of Rights |
|
|
94 | (32) |
|
|
94 | (1) |
|
A The Relation between Justification and Structure |
|
|
95 | (1) |
|
|
95 | (5) |
|
C Abstraction Levels in IP Law |
|
|
100 | (11) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
2 Abstraction Levels in Copyright |
|
|
101 | (5) |
|
3 Abstraction Levels in Patent Law |
|
|
106 | (3) |
|
4 Abstraction Levels in Trademark/Trade Names Law |
|
|
109 | (2) |
|
D The Concept of Use/Exploitation of IP Law -- in Particular in Relation to Copyright |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
2 Problems Relating to Exploitation Rights in Copyright |
|
|
114 | (7) |
|
|
121 | (2) |
|
E Conclusions on IP as Objects |
|
|
123 | (3) |
|
7 Conclusions to Be Drawn from IPRs as Assets |
|
|
126 | (74) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
A Alienability v. Inalienability of IPRs |
|
|
127 | (4) |
|
B Transfers and Securitazation of IPRs: The Impact of the Nature of the Legal Object |
|
|
131 | (7) |
|
C The Interface between the Transfer of IPRs and the Transfer of Copies of IP-Protected Subject Matter |
|
|
138 | (3) |
|
D Takings/Expropriation of IPRs |
|
|
141 | (41) |
|
|
141 | (1) |
|
2 IPRs as Protected Subject Matter under Expropriation/Takings Rules |
|
|
142 | (19) |
|
3 What Rights Are Protected against Expropriation/Takings? The Right to Exclude or Also the Right (Privilege) to Use? |
|
|
161 | (6) |
|
4 What Constitutes an (Unlawful) Expropriation/Taking of IPRs |
|
|
167 | (13) |
|
|
180 | (2) |
|
E IPRs as Property in Assets v. Other Fundamental Rights |
|
|
182 | (15) |
|
|
182 | (2) |
|
2 CJEU Case Law on IP as Property v. Other Fundamental Rights |
|
|
184 | (5) |
|
3 ECtHR on the "Balancing Paradigm" |
|
|
189 | (3) |
|
|
192 | (5) |
|
F Conclusions on IPRs as Assets |
|
|
197 | (3) |
|
|
200 | (2) |
Bibliography |
|
202 | (17) |
Index |
|
219 | |