Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts [Hardback]

(University of Wisconsin, Madison)
  • Formāts: Hardback, 304 pages, height x width x depth: 28x15x2 mm
  • Sērija : American Politics and Political Economy Series
  • Izdošanas datums: 01-Oct-1999
  • Izdevniecība: University of Chicago Press
  • ISBN-10: 0226092704
  • ISBN-13: 9780226092706
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 106,73 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 304 pages, height x width x depth: 28x15x2 mm
  • Sērija : American Politics and Political Economy Series
  • Izdošanas datums: 01-Oct-1999
  • Izdevniecība: University of Chicago Press
  • ISBN-10: 0226092704
  • ISBN-13: 9780226092706
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Since the creation of minority-dominated congressional districts eight years ago, the Supreme Court has condemned the move as akin to "political apartheid," while many African-American leaders argue that such districts are required for authentic representation.

In the most comprehensive treatment of the subject to date, David Canon shows that the unintended consequences of black majority districts actually contradict the common wisdom that whites will not be adequately represented in these areas. Not only do black candidates need white votes to win, but this crucial "swing" vote often decides the race. And, once elected, even the black members who appeal primarily to black voters usually do a better job than white members of walking the racial tightrope, balancing the needs of their diverse constituents.

Ultimately, Canon contends, minority districting is good for the country as a whole. These districts not only give African Americans a greater voice in the political process, they promote a politics of commonality—a biracial politics—rather than a politics of difference.


Since the creation of minority-dominated congressional districts eight years ago, the Supreme Court has condemned the move as akin to "political apartheid," while many African-American leaders argue that such districts are required for authentic representation.

In the most comprehensive treatment of the subject to date, David Canon shows that the unintended consequences of black majority districts actually contradict the common wisdom that whites will not be adequately represented in these areas. Not only do black candidates need white votes to win, but this crucial "swing" vote often decides the race. And, once elected, even the black members who appeal primarily to black voters usually do a better job than white members of walking the racial tightrope, balancing the needs of their diverse constituents.

Ultimately, Canon contends, minority districting is good for the country as a whole. These districts not only give African Americans a greater voice in the political process, they promote a politics of commonality--a biracial politics--rather than a politics of difference.


List of Tables and Figures ix Preface xi INTRODUCTION Race, Redistricting, and Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives 1(264) Black Interests, Difference, Commonality, and Representation 20(40) A Legal Primer on Race and Redistricting 60(33) The Supply-Side Theory of Racial Redistricting 93(50) Matthew M. Schousen Patrick J. Sellers Race and Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives 143(58) Links to the Constituency 201(42) Black Majority Districts: Failed Experiment or Catalyst for a Politics of Commonality? 243(22) Appendix A. Data Sources 265(3) Appendix B. Procedures for Coding the Newspaper Stories 268(5) Notes 273(20) References 293(20) Index 313