Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Redistricting and Representation: Why Competitive Elections are Bad for America [Taylor & Francis e-book]

(University of Texas at Dallas, USA)
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Taylor & Francis e-book
  • Cena: 204,55 €*
  • * this price gives unlimited concurrent access for unlimited time
  • Standarta cena: 292,22 €
  • Ietaupiet 30%
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

Pundits have observed that if so many incumbents are returned to Congress to each election by such wide margins, perhaps we should look for ways to increase competitiveness – a centerpiece to the American way of life – through redistricting. Do competitive elections increase voter satisfaction? How does voting for a losing candidate affect voters’ attitudes toward government? The not-so-surprising conclusion is that losing voters are less satisfied with Congress and their Representative, but the implications for the way in which we draw congressional and state legislative districts are less straightforward.

Redistricting and Representation argues that competition in general elections is not the sine qua non of healthy democracy, and that it in fact contributes to the low levels of approval of Congress and its members. Brunell makes the case for a radical departure from traditional approaches to redistricting – arguing that we need to "pack" districts with as many like-minded partisans as possible, maximizing the number of winning voters, not losers.

Preface viii
1 Introduction 1
2 Theories of representation 16
3 Voters prefer to win elections 29
4 Traditional redistricting principles 50
5 Why competitive elections are bad and noncompetitive elections are good 75
6 Addressing the critiques 90
7 Conclusion 113
Notes 126
References 136
Index 143


Thomas L. Brunell is associate professor of political science at The University of Texas at Dallas.