Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Research Handbook on Design Law

Edited by
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 63,12 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
Research Handbook on Design LawPalielināt
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Written by expert scholars and practitioners, this unique Research Handbook presents the state of the art in research on, and the practice of, international design law. Combining cutting-edge research with a practical approach, it examines key trends and covers key cases, regional and national laws, as well as concepts of international design protection. In particular, the U.S. framework is compared with the regime of the EU, and issues relating to the Hague Agreement are also covered.

Split across five thematic parts, this Research Handbook examines the foundations of, and methodological perspectives on, design law, the establishment and enforcement of protection, as well as many other critical issues, addressed from a transnational and comparative approach. Chapters consider protection of three-dimensional trade marks, graphical user interfaces, spare parts, protection of designs on the basis of use, priority issues under the Community design scheme, and cross-border copyright protection in Europe.





Clear and accessible, the Research Handbook on Design Law will be of value to emerging and established scholars and students of international design law, while also being a key resource for practitioners and policy makers seeking to react and adapt to the rapid emergence of global developments.

Recenzijas

There is much to learn on design law from this authoritative 556-page compendium. Policy authorities, Industrial Property offices examiners, patent attorneys, trademark attorneys, judges, and any readers interested in the legal portrait of designs and on the interplay of designs with other IPRs will find that the photos, figures, and drawings of designs illustrating several chapters render this encyclopedic Handbook even more useful. -- Elisabeth Kasznar Fekete, Book Review: Research Handbook on Design Law, Henning Hartwig, ed., 114 Trademark Rep. 686 (2024) Hennig Hartwigs edited collection is a timely, highly informative and fundamental contribution to the academic debate on design rights in general, and the surrounding policies and divergent approaches taken to them in various jurisdictions, in particular. The breadth of topics and jurisdictions discussed, and the books depth of analysis, makes the Research Handbook on Design Law an invaluable addition to Elgars series and IP scholarship at large. It is an indispensable read for all those interested in gaining a wider and deeper understanding of all pertinent issues concerning design law, and it provides a springboard for further research and policy discussions in this exciting field of IP law. -- Marc D. Mimler, Queen Mary Journal of Intellectual Property The slant is more to the academic than to the practitioner but it has enough for both. If you want to know what is the state of the law on design topic X, this is the book for you. You will probably also find, as I did, that once you delve into one chapter you will find a wealth of information around the topic as well as on the question you originally asked. And you will no doubt wonder at some point, as you look at one of the many illustrations of some mundane design: how on earth did that ever get registered? The answers are all within. -- Douglas Campbell QC, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice This is an excellent book for those who are seriously interested in design law. The contributions have been written by leading academics and practitioners in design law and together represent a treasure trove of cases, examples, good pieces of advice and detailed and high quality analyses of different aspects of design law. It is particularly refreshing that many of the contributors manage to include comparative perspectives. This book delivers on all the parameters and more so and it does so with flying colors. -- Jens Schovsbo, Nordiskt Immateriellt Rättsskydd The Research Handbook on Design Law addresses the need by collecting comparative studies of product designs authored by the world's leading practitioners and scholars. Topics are carefully selected by Dr. Henning Hartwig, a leading design law practitioner involved in the landmark decisions of the Court of Justice for European Union (CJEU), based on his extensive experience in litigating community and German design rights and other related rights for both German and US clients. Overall, it bridges academic theories and a practice strategy for procuring and enforcing multiple IP rights on product designs in the global market. -- Toshiko Takenaka, Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society In short, this book is an exceptional foray into the multifaceted world of designs and provides an invaluable source of scholarship for both practitioners, academics and policy-makers specialising in this fast-moving area of IP. It contributes to the current state of knowledge in this field and gives much material for further reflection. -- Gordon Humphreys, European Intellectual Property Review The book is at home on both an academic and a practitioner bookshelf and Im sure will be an important and valuable work for many years to come. -- Rosie Burbridge, IPkat.com This work is based on the knowledge of how important every chapter is for deepening, but also for harmonizing international design law. In this respect, this book makes an essential contribution. These in-depth analyses are not only a very welcome help for daily practice but particularly nowadays when preparing for a reform of the design law of the European Union also of great value for the further development of this area of intellectual property law. -- Guido Kucsko, Österreichische Blätter für Gewerblichen Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht (originally published in German: translated by Henning Hartwig) This collection offers a highly readable collection of scholarship which is to be commended for getting to grips with the nitty gritty of difficult points of design law, and for its rich coverage of different jurisdictional perspectives. The Handbook offers an invaluable resource to readers looking to develop comparative perspectives. It also shines a light on a number of design law issues which have perhaps not received the attention in the literature that they deserve, as well as exploring still-evolving points of practice and the potential for novel interdisciplinary inputs. The collection is also rightly imbued throughout with a sustained interest and focus on the particularities and challenges of design law as a legal field which is very much centred upon the visual, and the inherent difficulties which arise as a result in design filing and in analysing, arguing and deciding design cases. Contributions are both practically useful and intellectually stimulating, and the collection is populated throughout with helpful illustrations a must in any text dealing with design law. -- Jane Cornwell, Intellectual Property Quarterly 'This book is both a practice-oriented and intellectually inspiring analysis of European, U.S. and international design law. Its chapters, written by practitioners and academics who are leading in this field, cover fundamental issues of practical importance, of doctrine and of policy.' -- Ansgar Ohly, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany 'Design law is perhaps the most conceptually challenging of all IP rights, sometimes and sometimes not co-existing with other IP rights. Trade marks, copyright and some patent law conceptions are all in the mix. This collection of chapters is remarkable. It illuminates the issues and how different laws and judicial decisions around the world have, in their various ways, struggled with the often inchoate or cloudy concepts behind legislation. And the book is also a pleasure to read. A must.' -- The Rt. Hon. Sir Robin Jacob, UCL Faculty of Laws, UK

List of contributors
xix
List of abbreviations
xxi
Introduction to the Research Handbook on Design Law xxiv
Henning Hartwig
PART I FOUNDATIONS
1 Requirements for Design Protection: Global Commonalities
2(28)
Bernard Volken
I Law and design
2(3)
1 Design: what's that?
2(1)
2 Design law: balance of interests?
3(1)
3 Review of interests
4(1)
II Fundamental principles of design protection
5(14)
1 Subject matter of design protection
5(1)
a) Definition of a design
5(2)
b) Representation of a design
7(2)
c) Interpretation of a design
9(1)
2 Priority claim (`the same')
10(1)
3 Test for validity
11(1)
a) Novelty
12(3)
b) Individual character
15(1)
c) Non-obviousness
16(1)
4 Test for infringement
17(1)
5 Exclusion from protection
17(2)
6 Defences to infringement
19(1)
III Registration versus use
19(1)
1 Concept of registration
19(1)
2 Concept of use
19(1)
3 Similarities and differences
20(1)
IV Design versus patent versus copyright approach
20(3)
1 Patent approach
20(1)
2 Copyright approach
21(2)
3 Design approach
23(1)
V The international legal environment: past and present
23(7)
1 History of origin
23(1)
a) TRIPS Agreement
23(1)
b) Paris Convention
24(1)
c) Geneva Act of the Hague Agreement
24(1)
d) Locarno Agreement
25(1)
2 Status quo
25(1)
a) Harmonisation in terms of formalities
25(3)
b) Non-harmonisation in terms of substantive law
28(2)
2 Trends in Functionality Jurisprudence: U.S. and E.U. Design Law
30(47)
Jason J. Du Mont
Mark D. Janis
I Introduction
30(1)
II Functionality in U.S. design patent law: critical trends
31(18)
1 Emergence of a bifurcated approach: validity versus scope functionality
31(3)
2 Applying validity functionality doctrine
34(1)
a) Predominance of `alternative designs' evidence
35(2)
b) Assessing what constitutes an alternative design
37(1)
c) The alternative designs analysis for standard-essential designs
38(1)
d) Limiting the role of ornamentality tests
39(1)
3 Applying scope functionality doctrine
40(1)
a) Scope functionality in the claim construction analysis
40(1)
aa) Process considerations after Teva
40(2)
bb) Functionality and the abstractions problem
42(1)
b) Tempering the Richardson `factoring' analysis
43(6)
III Functionality in Community design law
49(27)
1 The exclusions
50(1)
a) Functionality exclusions
50(1)
aa) Features solely dictated by technical function
50(11)
bb) Features required for connectivity
61(2)
b) Visibility requirement for component parts
63(5)
2 Individual character and infringement doctrines
68(1)
a) Impressing the informed user
69(4)
b) The degree of freedom
73(3)
IV Conclusion
76(1)
3 Easier to See than to Say: Catching the Elusive Spirit of Design in a Net of Words
77(42)
David Musker
I Introduction
77(1)
II Imprecisions in decisions
77(5)
1 Verbalising and vocabularising: gaining words and losing meaning
79(2)
2 Of generality and granularity
81(1)
III Overall impression and the test person: realistic or legalistic?
82(1)
IV Separating two questions: essence and similarity
83(5)
1 The nature of the first question: the design
83(1)
2 Like-with-like comparison
84(1)
3 Determination of an unregistered design
84(1)
4 Construction of a registered design
85(2)
5 The nature of the second question: the visual comparison
87(1)
V Europe's `overall impression' test
88(1)
VI Dissecting the Gestalt
89(17)
1 Purposes of dissection: filtration, weighting and short-cuts
90(1)
2 Feature filtration
90(1)
a) Feature filtration: essential and inessential
90(2)
b) Feature filtration: old and new
92(1)
c) Feature filtration: functional, visible or ornamental
93(2)
d) Mixed-mode filtration
95(3)
e) Of babies and bathwater: the dangers of filtration
98(1)
3 Short-circuiting the comparison
99(1)
a) Omission of essential or dominant features
100(1)
b) Point of novelty
100(1)
4 Weighting and synthesis
101(1)
a) Weighting in relation to the prior art
102(1)
b) Distance from the prior art
102(1)
c) The `least distance rule'
103(2)
d) Density of prior art
105(1)
e) Design freedom
105(1)
f) Other factors
106(1)
VII Comparing overall impressions: `structured approaches'
106(2)
VIII Comparing similarities and differences at feature level
108(6)
1 The Eredu approach: weighting the comparisons
109(2)
2 Distortions caused by concentration on similarities
111(1)
3 Distortions caused by concentration on differences
111(1)
4 Difference in overall impression, or overall impression of difference?
111(2)
5 Expert overshadowing
113(1)
6 Trial fatigue and mind's eye strain
114(1)
IX Conclusion: some palliatives
114(5)
PART II METHODOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES
4 Reciprocity in European Design Law
119(50)
Henning Hartwig
I The concept of reciprocity
119(15)
1 The notion of reciprocity
120(1)
2 Interaction between prior art and validity
121(4)
3 Interaction between prior art and scope of protection
125(1)
4 Interaction between scope of protection and infringement
126(2)
5 Interaction between validity, scope of protection and infringement?
128(3)
6 Interaction between prior art, scope of protection and infringement
131(1)
7 Static scope of protection (date of reciprocity)
132(1)
8 Degree of freedom of the designer of earlier or later design?
133(1)
II Other fields of reciprocity
134(17)
1 Subject matter of earlier and later design
134(2)
2 Different views of earlier and later design (partial designs)
136(3)
3 Use of solid and broken lines in earlier and later design
139(1)
4 The feature of colour in earlier and later design
140(2)
5 Description of earlier or later design
142(2)
6 The relevant prior art when testing validity and infringement
144(2)
7 Use of earlier and later design in the course of trade
146(2)
8 Informed user of earlier and later design
148(2)
9 Designer of earlier and later design
150(1)
10 No protection for the design of living plants or against its use
150(1)
III Variations over time
151(12)
1 Re-design, facelift and rumours
151(5)
2 Eased conditions for finding validity?
156(4)
3 No discrimination of selected industries, sectors or categories
160(3)
IV Reciprocity in European trade mark, trade dress and copyright law
163(4)
1 Reciprocity in trade mark law
164(1)
2 Reciprocity in trade dress law
165(1)
3 Reciprocity in copyright law
166(1)
V Conclusions
167(2)
5 Design Rights and Designer's Rights in the EU
169(38)
Anna Tischner
I Introduction
169(1)
II Authorship and ownership
170(32)
1 Designer's personal interests (designer's right of paternity)
170(4)
2 Ownership
174(1)
a) Initial entitlement (`designer doctrine')
174(1)
b) The notion of the `designer'
175(2)
c) Joint designership
177(1)
aa) Plurality of designers
178(1)
bb) The notion of'jointly developed'
179(1)
cc) Changes to the original design
180(1)
dd) Degree of contribution
181(3)
d) The notion of the'successor in title'
184(1)
e) Designs developed by an employee
184(1)
aa) Original allocation of rights
184(2)
bb) Variations under national law
186(1)
cc) The employment relationship
186(2)
dd) `Developed by an employee in the execution of his duties'
188(1)
ee) `Following the instructions given by the employer'
189(1)
f) Designs developed pursuant to a commission
190(2)
g) The nature and protection of the right to the design
192(3)
h) Procedural issues under Article 17 CDR
195(1)
3 Dealings with Community designs as objects of property
196(1)
a) Community designs as national rights (Article 27 CDR)
196(1)
b) Transfer (Article 30 CDR)
197(1)
c) Licensing (Article 32 CDR)
197(4)
d) Entry in the register
201(1)
4 Design contract law
202(3)
III Conclusions and future challenges
205(2)
6 Enablement and Indefiniteness in U.S. Design Patents after In re Maatita and Ex parte Kaufman
207(25)
Margaret Poison
I Introduction
207(1)
II Background
208(3)
1 The enablement and indefiniteness requirement
208(2)
2 Subject matter of the design and scope of the claim
210(1)
3 Views of all sides of a three-dimensional object required?
210(1)
III Ex parte Kaufman
211(1)
1 The findings of the USPTO's examiner
211(1)
2 The findings of the PTAB
212(1)
IV In re Maatita
212(5)
1 The findings of the USPTO's examiner
213(2)
2 The findings of the PTAB
215(1)
3 The findings of the Federal Circuit
216(1)
V Applying In re Maatita to examples
217(5)
VI Some distinct criticism
222(2)
VII A supplementary view from Europe
224(5)
1 Determining the subject matter of a partial design
224(1)
2 Written text or context irrelevant
225(2)
3 Testing infringement of a partial design
227(1)
4 Testing validity of a partial design
228(1)
VIII Concluding remarks
229(3)
PART III ESTABLISHING AND ENFORCING PROTECTION
7 Protection of Designs on the Basis of Use
232(18)
Estelle Derclaye
I Introduction
232(1)
II Unregistered design rights in the EU and elsewhere
233(1)
1 Unregistered Community design rights
233(1)
2 National unregistered design rights or similar protection in Europe and elsewhere
233(1)
III Establishing unregistered design rights in the EU and U.K.: nature of establishing acts and territorial link
234(7)
1 European Union
234(1)
a) Territorial aspects when establishing unregistered Community design rights
234(1)
b) Nature of acts establishing unregistered Community design rights
235(2)
c) Ownership of an unregistered Community design right
237(1)
2 United Kingdom
237(1)
a) Nature of the U.K. unregistered design right
237(2)
b) Requirement of a `qualifying design'
239(2)
IV Proof of copying and remedies in case of an infringement of unregistered design rights
241(1)
V Disadvantages for non-EU entities?
242(2)
VI Comparison with `neighbouring' rights
244(4)
1 Copyright law
244(1)
2 Trade mark law
244(1)
3 Unfair competition and passing off
245(1)
a) Passing off
245(1)
b) Unfair competition
246(2)
VII Conclusion
248(2)
8 Claiming Priority under the Community Design Scheme
250(33)
Henning Hartwig
I Priority requirements under international design law
251(2)
II Interaction between patent and design law
253(3)
III Who decides on a valid priority claim
256(4)
1 When is the EUIPO called to examine priority?
256(2)
2 When are infringement courts called to examine priority?
258(2)
IV What to decide: same subject matter, same design and date of priority
260(3)
1 Same subject matter under the Paris Convention
260(1)
2 Same design under the Community design scheme
261(1)
3 Date of priority
262(1)
V Claiming priority: how to decide
263(6)
1 Differences between priority claim and subsequent Community design
263(2)
2 Differences between priority claim and asserted Community design
265(2)
3 A test for reciprocity
267(2)
VI Multiple and partial priorities
269(8)
VII Internal priority
277(4)
VIII Conclusions
281(2)
9 Enforcing Design Rights throughout Europe
283(21)
Annette Kur
I Introduction
283(1)
II Sanctions for design infringement
284(7)
1 The Enforcement Directive
284(1)
2 Overview on the implementation of the Enforcement Directive in the Member States
285(1)
a) Injunctions
285(1)
b) Damages
286(2)
c) Rendering of accounts
288(1)
d) Disclosure of information
289(1)
e) Corrective measures
290(1)
f) Publication of judgments
291(1)
3 Commonalities and divergences
291(1)
III International jurisdiction in case of design infringement
291(8)
1 The Brussels I Regulation and the Community Designs Regulation
291(4)
2 Recognition and enforcement of decisions under the Brussels Regulation
295(1)
3 Claims against multiple defendants under the Brussels I Regulation
296(1)
a) Requirements for joinder of parties
296(1)
b) Extent of international jurisdiction
297(2)
IV Applicable substantive law
299(2)
V Concluding remarks
301(3)
PART IV CRITICAL ISSUES
10 Protection of Spare Parts in Design Law: A Comparative Law Analysis
304(41)
Annette Kur
Adam Gyorgy
I Introduction
304(1)
II European Union
305(15)
1 Spare part protection under design law
305(1)
a) Specific requirements for component parts
305(1)
b) `Must-fit' and `must-match' features
306(1)
c) `Freeze-plus' and the withdrawn European Commission proposal
306(1)
d) The Community Designs Regulation
307(3)
e) The situation in the European Union (before 1 January 2021)
310(1)
aa) Community and national design law
310(1)
bb) Overlap with other IP rights
311(2)
2 Competition law
313(1)
3 New (or envisaged) legislation in Germany and France
314(2)
4 Further harmonisation?
316(1)
a) The Economic Review
317(1)
b) The Legal Review x
318(1)
c) ECTA
319(1)
III Other jurisdictions
320(18)
1 United States
320(1)
a) Overview
320(1)
b) Requirements for protection: ornamentality versus functionality
321(1)
c) Design patent exhaustion and the right to repair
322(2)
d) The proposed `repair clause'
324(2)
e) Antitrust considerations
326(1)
2 Brazil
327(4)
3 South Africa
331(2)
4 Japan
333(1)
5 Turkey
334(1)
6 Australia
335(3)
IV International design law
338(3)
1 Overview
338(1)
2 Exclusion of spare parts from design protection
338(1)
3 Repair clauses and the three-step test
339(2)
V Conclusions
341(4)
1 Comparative summary
341(2)
2 Summary of possible solutions
343(2)
11 Design Protection for Graphical User Interfaces
345(33)
Tracy-Gene G. Durkin
I Introduction
345(4)
II GUI protection through different IP rights and in different jurisdictions
349(2)
III United States
351(8)
1 History of design patent protection for GUI
351(1)
2 Protecting GUI under design patent law
352(3)
3 Enforcing GUI design patents
355(4)
IV China
359(5)
1 History of design patent protection for GUI
359(1)
2 Protecting GUI under Chinese design patent law
360(2)
3 Enforcing GUI design patents
362(2)
V Japan
364(6)
1 History of design protection for GUI
364(1)
2 Protecting GUI under Japanese design law
365(5)
3 Recent legislative developments
370(1)
VI Australia
370(5)
1 History of design protection for GUI
370(3)
2 Protecting GUI under Australian design law
373(1)
3 Recent legislative developments
374(1)
VII Conclusion
375(3)
12 `Mast-Jagermeister' before the Court of Justice of the EU: What the Outcome Really Means
378(27)
Henning Hartwig
I Introduction
378(2)
II Subject matter of the designs at issue
380(5)
III Legal context and law
385(1)
IV Mast-Jagermeister's arguments and sole ground of appeal before the CJEU
385(3)
V The judgment in Mast-Jagermeister
388(1)
VI Inconsistency or ambiguity of views?
388(2)
VII Inconsistency between views and product indication?
390(6)
VIII Remedies in case of deficiencies?
396(1)
IX The German applications filed by Mast-Jagermeister
397(3)
X Conclusions
400(5)
PART V TRANSNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE DIMENSIONS
13 International Design Law Policies: Present and Future
405(36)
Robert Mirko Stutz
I Status and prospects of the Hague Agreement
405(25)
1 History of origin
405(1)
2 Advantages of design rights acquired through the Hague Agreement
406(1)
3 Status quo
407(1)
4 Complicated coexistence of different regimes
408(1)
5 Goals of the Geneva Act: deposition of declarations
408(1)
a) Declarations to be deposited by Contracting Parties with an examining office
409(1)
b) Declarations to be deposited by any Contracting Party
409(2)
6 New countries joining the Geneva Act: what to expect?
411(1)
a) Republic of Korea
412(2)
b) United States
414(2)
c) Japan
416(2)
d) Russian Federation
418(2)
e) United Kingdom and Northern Ireland
420(1)
f) Canada
420(2)
g) Mexico
422(1)
h) People's Republic of China
423(1)
i) Appraising the enlargement of the geographical scope
424(2)
7 The Hague Working Group: its aims and goals
426(1)
a) Meetings held in 2011 and 2012
426(1)
b) Meetings held in 2013 and 2014
427(1)
c) Fifth meeting held in 2015
428(1)
d) Sixth meeting held in 2017
429(1)
e) Seventh meeting held in 2018
430(1)
II Status and improvement of the Locarno Classification
430(4)
1 History of origin and status quo
430(1)
2 Prospects: still waiting for a new search system
431(3)
III Proposal for a Design Law Treaty
434(7)
1 History of origin
435(2)
2 Status quo
437(2)
3 Goals of the Design Law Treaty
439(1)
4 Relationship between the Design Law Treaty and the Hague Agreement
440(1)
14 Three-Dimensional Trade Marks and Designs: Comparison and Conflict
441(41)
Alexander von Muhlendahl
I Introduction
441(2)
II Comparison
443(18)
1 Registrability/protectability
443(1)
a) Trade marks
443(1)
aa) Representation: clarity and precision
443(1)
bb) Absolute grounds: distinctiveness
443(2)
cc) Earlier rights
445(1)
b) Designs
446(1)
aa) Clarity and precision: single design
446(1)
bb) Novelty and individual character
447(2)
c) Comparison
449(1)
2 Absolute exclusions
449(1)
a) Trade marks
449(1)
aa) Shape resulting from the goods themselves
450(1)
bb) Shape necessary to obtain a technical result
451(1)
cc) Shape giving substantial value to the goods
452(4)
b) Designs
456(1)
c) Comparison
457(4)
III Conflicts between trade marks and designs
461(19)
1 Earlier design and later trade mark
461(1)
a) Infringement of a design by the use of a trade mark
461(2)
b) Defences
463(1)
c) Invalidity
463(1)
2 Earlier trade mark and later design
464(1)
a) Infringement of a trade mark by the use of a design
464(1)
aa) Trade mark use of a design
464(1)
bb) Conflict situations
465(1)
cc) Identity or similarity of the mark and the design
466(1)
dd) Similarity of goods
466(1)
ee) Infringing use
467(1)
b) Defences
467(2)
c) Invalidity
469(1)
aa) Distinctive sign
470(1)
bb) Trade mark use
470(1)
cc) Identical or similar signs
471(1)
dd) Similarity of goods or services
471(1)
ee) Contesting the validity of the earlier trade mark
472(1)
ff) Cases
473(3)
gg) Earlier distinctive sign as part of the relevant design corpus
476(1)
hh) Maintenance in modified form
477(1)
d) Conclusions
478(1)
3 Comparison
479(1)
IV Summary
480(2)
15 Cross-border Copyright Protection in Europe
482(25)
Uma Suthersanen
I Introduction: harmonisation and free movement
482(3)
II The EU `principle of cumulation': a historical legacy
485(5)
1 Comparative legal antecedents
485(2)
2 Genesis of Article 17 Designs Directive
487(3)
III The EU `principle of cumulation': modern interpretations
490(12)
1 Genesis of EU policy in Flos
490(2)
2 The dark horse: originality as interpreted in Cofemel and Brompton
492(1)
3 National approaches within the EU
493(1)
a) United Kingdom: abandoning the duration exception
493(2)
b) Germany: abandoning the Stufentheorie approach
495(3)
c) Italy: abandoning `artistic value'
498(2)
d) France: Vive I'unite de I'art!
500(2)
IV Conclusions
502(5)
1 Pre-emption of national sovereignty
502(2)
2 Changing socio-legal context
504(3)
16 How Different is Different? Modern Neuroscience and its Impact on Design Law
507(43)
Charles Lee Mauro
Christopher Daniel Morley
I The changing business value of visual design and design intellectual property
507(2)
II Data-driven decision-making in the modern world
509(2)
III Emerging applications of neuroscience in law: neuroaesthetics
511(2)
IV Why the finder of fact needs support from research data to better inform their design patent infringement decisions
513(3)
1 Inadequate training of judge and jury related to shape perception science
513(2)
2 Expert witnesses
515(1)
V How we perceive shapes in the real world
516(14)
1 Overview of vision science and shape perception
516(1)
2 Information processing for shape perception and object recognition
516(1)
a) Bottom-up processing
517(1)
b) Top-down processing
518(2)
3 Critical principles related to shape perception and object recognition
520(1)
a) Cognitive minimisation
520(1)
b) Canonical view
521(1)
c) Gestalt principles of perception
521(1)
d) Salience of parts of objects
522(1)
4 Perceptual biases impact shape perception
523(2)
5 Transformations of shapes do not impact shape perception
525(3)
6 Impact of branding on shape perception
528(2)
7 Individual differences in design sensitivity
530(1)
VI An empirical ordinary observer test
530(3)
VII Determining damages in a changing design patent litigation landscape
533(3)
1 Apple v Samsung: a big win for defendants in design patent matters
534(1)
2 Current summary judgment practices
534(1)
3 How damages are calculated based on the recent Apple v Samsung ruling
535(1)
VIII The damages phase of design patent cases
536(3)
1 What SCOTUS and the litigating parties missed
536(1)
2 The criticality of component part patents
537(1)
3 The use of canonical parts in product design and design patents
537(2)
4 Why are there so few component part patent suits?
539(1)
IX The DOJ 4-Factor test
539(7)
1 Making the DOJ framework workable in the context of design patent damages
540(1)
2 Lack of factor prioritisation and logical flow model
540(1)
3 Prioritisation is possible and supportable
541(1)
4 Why the second DOJ Factor is the gating function: the brand extension test
541(1)
5 The canonical-view test
542(1)
6 Automatic override of the Factor 3 test (conceptually distinct)
542(1)
7 Elimination of Factors 1 and 4
542(1)
8 Application of Rule 289 (full profits)
543(1)
9 The slippery slope of less than full profits under Rule 289
543(1)
10 DOJ defines one step but leaves second step open
543(1)
11 The use of DOJ Factors 1, 3 and 4
544(1)
12 In utility patent cases, the courts set a high bar for apportionment and calculation of damages
544(1)
13 In utility patent cases, supportable damage calculations often require consumer/user research
545(1)
14 Apportionment research in a design patent case is not like apportionment research in a utility patent case
545(1)
X Advanced design research methods that generate reliable data on the value of visual design in product success
546(2)
XI Conclusion
548(2)
Index 550
Edited by Henning Hartwig, Attorney-at-Law, Bardehle Pagenberg, Munich, Germany
Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām Biežāk uzdotie jautājumi par e-grāmatām
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/97817819558882e.html
Keywords: