Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Assessment Processes: Letter Report

  • Formāts: 53 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 20-Aug-2012
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309260534
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Formāts - EPUB+DRM
  • Cena: 32,55 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 53 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 20-Aug-2012
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309260534
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

At the request of NASA, an IOM committee reviewed NASA Human Research Program's (HRP's) Scientific Merit Assessment Processes for directed research. Directed research is commissioned or noncompetitively awarded research that is not competitively solicited because of specific reasons, such as time limitations or highly focused or constrained research topics.



The scientific merit assessment processes have been developed by NASA to evaluate individual directed research tasks in order to ensure the scientific integrity of the HRP's directed research portfolio. The committee examined the HRP's current scientific merit assessment processes and conducted a public workshop to identify best practices among other federal agencies that use various assessment processes for similar types of directed research.



Review of NASA Human Research Program's Scientific Merit Processes: Letter Report finds that the scientific merit assessment process used by the HRP for directed research is scientifically rigorous and is similar to the processes and merit criteria used by many other federal agencies and organizations - including the Department of Defense, National Institutes of Health, and the United States Department of Agriculture - for comparable types of research. This report also makes recommendations on ways to streamline and bolster the accountability and transparency of NASA's current processes.

Table of Contents



Front Matter Letter Report REFERENCES Appendix A: Workshop Agenda and List of Participants Appendix B: Committee Biosketches
Acronyms xi
Letter to Nasa
1(3)
Directed Research at the Nasa Human Research Program
4(2)
Overall Assessment
6(1)
Identifying Directed Research
7(6)
Findings
11(1)
Recommendations
12(1)
Scientific Merit Assessment Process
13(6)
Merit Assessment Criteria
13(1)
Processes Used to Conduct Scientific Merit Assessment
14(2)
Length of Peer Review
16(1)
Findings
16(2)
Recommendation
18(1)
Evaluation and Quality Improvement
19(8)
Findings
22(1)
Recommendation
22(5)
Summary
23(2)
References
25(2)
APPENDIXES
A Workshop Agenda and List of Participants
27(8)
B Committee Biosketches
35