Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Risk Analysis and Uncertainty in Flood Damage Reduction Studies

  • Formāts: 216 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 20-Oct-2000
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309569828
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 42,58 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 216 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 20-Oct-2000
  • Izdevniecība: National Academies Press
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9780309569828

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Reducing flood damage is a complex task that requires multidisciplinary understanding of the earth sciences and civil engineering. In addressing this task the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers employs its expertise in hydrology, hydraulics, and geotechnical and structural engineering. Dams, levees, and other river-training works must be sized to local conditions; geotechnical theories and applications help ensure that structures will safely withstand potential hydraulic and seismic forces; and economic considerations must be balanced to ensure that reductions in flood damages are proportionate with project costs and associated impacts on social, economic, and environmental values.



A new National Research Council report, Risk Analysis and Uncertainty in Flood Damage Reduction Studies, reviews the Corps of Engineers' risk-based techniques in its flood damage reduction studies and makes recommendations for improving these techniques. Areas in which the Corps has made good progress are noted, and several steps that could improve the Corps' risk-based techniques in engineering and economics applications for flood damage reduction are identified. The report also includes recommendations for improving the federal levee certification program, for broadening the scope of flood damage reduction planning, and for improving communication of risk-based concepts.

Table of Contents



Front Matter Executive Summary The Corps and U.S. Flood Damage Reduction Planning, Policies, and Programs Decision Making and Communication Issues Risk Analysis Concepts and Terms Risk Analysis Techniques Case Studies Evaluation and Proposed Improvements Levee Certification Conclusions and Recommendations References Appendix A: Glossary Appendix B: Corps-FEMA Levee Certification Documentation Appendix C: Economic and Environmental Principles for Water Related Land Resources Implementation Studies Appendix D: Functions and Random Variables Appendix E: Biographical Information
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1(167)
The Corps and U.S. Flood Damage Reduction Planning, Policies, and Programs
12(17)
Risk Analysis Approach
14(1)
The Corps's Water Resource Project Planning Procedures
15(9)
U.S. Federal Flood Preparedness, Mitigation, and Response Activities
24(5)
Decision Making and Communication Issues
29(11)
The Goal of Floodplain Management
30(1)
Multiple Objectives
31(2)
Comparing Project Alternatives
33(3)
Floodplain Management Alternatives
36(1)
Risk Communication
37(3)
Risk Analysis Concepts and Terms
40(11)
Uncertainty
40(5)
Consistency Across Program Areas
45(2)
Risk Analysis and Decision Making
47(4)
Risk Analysis Techniques
51(20)
Corps Framework
53(1)
Natural Variability and Imperfect Knowledge
54(5)
Risk Analysis
59(3)
Monte Carlo Simulation
62(2)
Assessment of Engineering Performance
64(3)
Geotechnical Reliability
67(4)
Case Studies
71(43)
Beargrass Creek
72(26)
Red River of the North at East Grand Forks, Minnesota, and Grand Forks, North Dakota
98(16)
Evaluation and Proposed Improvements
114(25)
Concerns with the Risk Analysis Methods
114(1)
Engineering Performance
115(4)
Hydrologic Analysis
119(3)
Geotechnical Reliability
122(1)
Economic Performance
123(4)
Interdependence in Risk Analysis for Flood Damage Assessment
127(1)
Correlation Length
128(1)
Spatial Aggregation
129(4)
Computational Alternatives to Minimize Correlation Effects
133(6)
Levee Certification
139(20)
History of Levee Certification
139(8)
Current Certification Criterion
147(2)
Analysis of Levee Sizing Criteria
149(6)
Technical Corrections to the Current Certification Procedure
155(1)
An Alternative Criterion: A Longer-Term Change
156(3)
Conclusions and Recommendations
159(9)
Risk Analysis Techniques
161(3)
Consistent Terminology
164(1)
Levee Certification
165(1)
Floodplain Management
166(2)
REFERENCES 168
APPENDIXES
A Glossary
175
B Corps---FEMA Levee Certification Documentation
181
C Economic and Environmental Principles for Water Related Land Resources Implementation Studies
193
D Functions of Random Variables
196
E Biographical Information
199
Committee on Risk-Based Analysis for Flood Damage Reduction, Water Science and Technology Board, National Research Council