Preface |
|
xix | |
Acknowledgments |
|
xxi | |
Authors |
|
xxiii | |
Chapter 1 Introduction |
|
1 | (38) |
|
|
1 | (4) |
|
1.1.1 Risk Management Landscape |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
|
1 | (1) |
|
1.1.3 History of Design Paradigms and Risk |
|
|
2 | (2) |
|
1.1.4 Convenient Definition for Risk |
|
|
4 | (1) |
|
1.2 Risk Basic Components |
|
|
5 | (3) |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.2.2 Threat/Hazard/Demand |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
1.2.3 Vulnerability/Capacity |
|
|
5 | (1) |
|
|
6 | (1) |
|
1.2.5 Basic Risk Equation |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.2.6 Risk Analogy Principle |
|
|
7 | (1) |
|
1.3 Reliability, Exposure, Likelihood, Resilience, and Sustainability |
|
|
8 | (14) |
|
|
8 | (1) |
|
|
9 | (2) |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
1.3.3.1 Exposure Application: Bridge Inspection |
|
|
11 | (1) |
|
|
12 | (1) |
|
|
13 | (5) |
|
|
13 | (1) |
|
1.3.5.2 Resilience and Its Components |
|
|
14 | (2) |
|
1.3.5.3 Resilience Management |
|
|
16 | (1) |
|
1.3.5.4 Asset Resilience vs. Community (Network) Resilience |
|
|
16 | (2) |
|
|
18 | (4) |
|
1.3.6.1 Risk Relationship with Resilience |
|
|
19 | (3) |
|
1.4 Components of Risk Management |
|
|
22 | (7) |
|
|
22 | (1) |
|
|
22 | (2) |
|
|
24 | (1) |
|
1.4.4 Risk Treatment/Improvement |
|
|
25 | (2) |
|
|
27 | (2) |
|
1.4.6 Risk Communications |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
1.5 Miscellaneous Issues Related to Risk Management |
|
|
29 | (6) |
|
|
29 | (1) |
|
|
30 | (1) |
|
1.5.3 Intersections/Links/Networks |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
1.5.4 Multihazards Considerations |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
1.5.5 Snapshot vs. Time Marching |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
1.5.6 Subjective vs. Objective Risk |
|
|
31 | (1) |
|
|
32 | (2) |
|
1.5.8 Unintended Consequences |
|
|
34 | (1) |
|
|
35 | (4) |
Chapter 2 Graph Networks |
|
39 | (40) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.1.2 Contents of This Chapter |
|
|
39 | (1) |
|
2.2 Formal Modeling of Graph Networks |
|
|
40 | (4) |
|
|
40 | (1) |
|
2.2.2 Components of Graph Networks |
|
|
41 | (2) |
|
|
41 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
42 | (1) |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
2.2.4 Cyclic vs. Acyclic Networks |
|
|
43 | (1) |
|
2.2.5 Observations (Evidence) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.2.5.1 Soft Evidence vs. Hard Evidence |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
|
44 | (8) |
|
|
44 | (1) |
|
2.3.2 Definition of Bayesian Networks |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
2.3.3 Templates of BN Examples |
|
|
45 | (1) |
|
2.3.4 Case Study 2.1: Absolute Risk vs. Relative Risk |
|
|
46 | (3) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
|
46 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
47 | (1) |
|
|
48 | (1) |
|
2.3.4.5 Concluding Remarks |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.3.5 Case Study 2.2: Infrastructure Security |
|
|
49 | (3) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
2.3.5.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
49 | (1) |
|
|
50 | (2) |
|
2.3.6 Bayesian Network: Closing Remarks |
|
|
52 | (1) |
|
|
52 | (7) |
|
2.4.1 Case Study 2.3: Traffic and Functional Class |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
53 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
2.4.2 Case Study 2.4: Architectural Vulnerability |
|
|
54 | (3) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
|
54 | (1) |
|
2.4.2.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
55 | (1) |
|
|
55 | (2) |
|
2.4.3 Case Study 2.3 Revisited: Traffic and Functional Class |
|
|
57 | (2) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
2.5 Chain Graphs: Combining Bayesian and Markov Networks |
|
|
59 | (4) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
2.5.2 Case Study 2.5: Risk and Its Components |
|
|
59 | (4) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
|
59 | (1) |
|
2.5.2.3 CPTs and Potentials |
|
|
59 | (2) |
|
|
61 | (2) |
|
2.6 Decision under Uncertainty: Influence Diagrams |
|
|
63 | (6) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
2.6.2 Decision Trees and Utility |
|
|
63 | (4) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
|
63 | (1) |
|
2.6.2.3 Case Study 2.6: Structure Inspection and Monitoring Methods Using Decision Tree |
|
|
64 | (3) |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
|
67 | (1) |
|
2.6.3.2 Case Study 2.7: Structure Inspection and Monitoring Methods Using ID |
|
|
67 | (2) |
|
2.7 Dynamic Graph Networks |
|
|
69 | (7) |
|
|
69 | (3) |
|
2.7.2 Time Marching in DGN |
|
|
72 | (1) |
|
2.7.3 Case Study 2.8: Observed vs. Actual Infrastructure Condition Rating |
|
|
72 | (4) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
76 | (1) |
|
|
77 | (2) |
Chapter 3 Risk Assessment |
|
79 | (112) |
|
|
79 | (7) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
3.1.2 Risk Assessment in Civil Infrastructures |
|
|
79 | (7) |
|
|
79 | (1) |
|
|
80 | (1) |
|
3.1.2.3 Flood and Scour Hazards |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
3.1.2.4 Geotechnical Engineering |
|
|
81 | (1) |
|
3.1.2.5 Offshore Platforms and Coastal Engineering |
|
|
82 | (1) |
|
3.1.2.6 Bridge Engineering |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3.1.2.7 Construction Engineering |
|
|
83 | (1) |
|
3.1.2.8 Environmental Risk |
|
|
84 | (1) |
|
|
85 | (1) |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
3.2 Risk Assessment Methods and Related Issues |
|
|
86 | (6) |
|
3.2.1 Essential Ingredient of Risk Assessment |
|
|
86 | (1) |
|
3.2.2 Risk Assessment Methods (Risk as a Function of Random Variables) |
|
|
87 | (1) |
|
3.2.2.1 Weighted Averages |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3.2.2.2 Probabilistic Tree Construct Methods: FTA and ETA |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3.2.3 Combination of Risks |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
|
88 | (1) |
|
3.2.3.2 Analytical Methods |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
|
89 | (1) |
|
3.2.4 Limit States and Risk Assessment |
|
|
89 | (3) |
|
3.2.4.1 Objective Limit States |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
3.2.4.2 Subjective Limit States |
|
|
90 | (1) |
|
3.2.4.3 Exposure Limit States |
|
|
90 | (2) |
|
3.2.4.4 Consequence Limit States |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
3.2.4.5 Risk Limit States |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
|
92 | (8) |
|
|
92 | (1) |
|
3.3.2 Case Study 3.1: Mass Transit Stations |
|
|
93 | (1) |
|
3.3.3 Case Study 3.2: Tunnels |
|
|
93 | (6) |
|
|
99 | (1) |
|
|
100 | (14) |
|
|
100 | (1) |
|
3.4.2 Case Study 3.3: Earthquake Risk |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
3.4.2.2 Model Description |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
3.4.2.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
|
101 | (1) |
|
3.4.3 Case Study 3.4: Blast Risk |
|
|
102 | (5) |
|
|
102 | (1) |
|
3.4.3.2 Model Description |
|
|
102 | (4) |
|
3.4.3.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
|
106 | (1) |
|
3.4.4 Case Study 3.5: Building Security |
|
|
107 | (4) |
|
|
107 | (1) |
|
3.4.4.2 Model Description |
|
|
108 | (1) |
|
3.4.4.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
108 | (2) |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
3.4.4.5 Concluding Remarks |
|
|
110 | (1) |
|
3.4.5 Case Study 3.6: Absolute Risk |
|
|
111 | (3) |
|
|
111 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
3.4.5.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
112 | (1) |
|
|
112 | (2) |
|
3.5 Civil Infrastructures Networks |
|
|
114 | (13) |
|
|
114 | (1) |
|
3.5.2 Case Study 3.7: BN Risk Assessment of Bridge Network |
|
|
115 | (8) |
|
|
115 | (4) |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
3.5.2.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
119 | (1) |
|
|
120 | (3) |
|
3.5.3 Case Study 3.8: Chain Graph Risk Assessment of Bridge Network |
|
|
123 | (4) |
|
|
123 | (1) |
|
|
124 | (1) |
|
3.5.3.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
125 | (1) |
|
|
126 | (1) |
|
3.6 Resilience Assessment |
|
|
127 | (13) |
|
|
127 | (1) |
|
3.6.2 Case Study 3.9: Flood (Scour) Resilience of Bridges, A 4-R Model |
|
|
128 | (6) |
|
|
128 | (2) |
|
3.6.2.2 Model Description |
|
|
130 | (2) |
|
3.6.2.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
132 | (1) |
|
3.6.2.4 Marginal Probabilities |
|
|
132 | (2) |
|
3.6.3 Case Study 3.10: Time-Continued Operations: Hazard Independent Building Resilience Model |
|
|
134 | (57) |
|
|
134 | (1) |
|
3.6.3.2 Model Description |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
3.6.3.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
135 | (1) |
|
|
136 | (4) |
|
Appendix 3.I: Definitions of Network Nodal Variables |
|
|
140 | (4) |
|
Appendix 3.II: CPTs for Case Study 3.3 |
|
|
144 | (4) |
|
Appendix 3.III: CPTs for Case Study 3.4 |
|
|
148 | (4) |
|
Appendix 3.IV: CPTs and Potentials for Case Study 3.5 |
|
|
152 | (10) |
|
Appendix 3.V: CPTs for Case Study 3.6 |
|
|
162 | (2) |
|
Appendix 3.VI: CPTs for Case Study 3.7 |
|
|
164 | (7) |
|
Appendix 3.VII: CPTs and Potentials for Case Study 3.8 |
|
|
171 | (8) |
|
Appendix 3.VIII: CPTs for Case Study 3.9 |
|
|
179 | (4) |
|
Appendix 3.IX: CPTs for Case Study 3.10 |
|
|
183 | (4) |
|
|
187 | (4) |
Chapter 4 Risk Acceptance |
|
191 | (70) |
|
|
191 | (3) |
|
|
191 | (1) |
|
4.1.2 Historical Background |
|
|
191 | (2) |
|
|
193 | (1) |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
4.2 Overview of Risk Acceptance Methods |
|
|
194 | (1) |
|
4.3 Subjective Risk Acceptance Methods |
|
|
195 | (4) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
|
195 | (1) |
|
4.3.3 Components Based Risk Acceptance |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.1 Multicomponent Acceptance |
|
|
196 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.2 Reliability-Based Acceptance |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.3 Exposure-Based Acceptance |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
4.3.3.4 Three-Component Acceptance |
|
|
197 | (1) |
|
4.3.4 Risk vs. Opportunity or Reward (Cost-Benefit) Acceptance Methods |
|
|
197 | (2) |
|
4.4 Semi-Subjective Risk Acceptance Methods |
|
|
199 | (4) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
199 | (2) |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
4.4.2.2 Theory of Utility |
|
|
199 | (1) |
|
|
200 | (1) |
|
4.4.2.4 Use of Utility in Risk Acceptance |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
|
201 | (1) |
|
4.4.4 Available Budget Method |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
|
202 | (1) |
|
4.5 Lower Limit States: Deterioration of Infrastructures |
|
|
203 | (11) |
|
|
203 | (1) |
|
4.5.2 Case Study 4.1: Deterioration of Single Asset |
|
|
204 | (6) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
|
204 | (1) |
|
4.5.2.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
205 | (1) |
|
|
206 | (2) |
|
|
208 | (2) |
|
4.5.3 Case Study 4.2: Deterioration of Multiple Connected Assets: Infrastructures Networks |
|
|
210 | (4) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
|
210 | (1) |
|
4.5.3.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
211 | (1) |
|
|
211 | (3) |
|
4.6 Case Study 4.3: Higher (Ductile) Limit States |
|
|
214 | (8) |
|
|
214 | (2) |
|
|
216 | (2) |
|
4.6.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
218 | (1) |
|
|
218 | (4) |
|
4.7 Case Study 4.4: Brittle Limit States: Risk/Reward of Proof Tests |
|
|
222 | (5) |
|
|
222 | (1) |
|
|
223 | (1) |
|
4.7.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
224 | (1) |
|
|
225 | (2) |
|
4.8 Acceptance Using Decision Methods |
|
|
227 | (10) |
|
4.8.1 Overview of Decision Methods |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
4.8.2 Case Study 4.5: Deterioration (Exposure)-Based Acceptance and Decision (01.03.02A) |
|
|
227 | (4) |
|
|
227 | (1) |
|
|
228 | (2) |
|
4.8.2.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
230 | (1) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
4.8.3 Case Study 4.6: Deterioration (Exposure) and Consequences Based Acceptance and Decision |
|
|
231 | (6) |
|
|
231 | (1) |
|
|
232 | (1) |
|
4.8.3.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
233 | (1) |
|
|
233 | (4) |
|
|
237 | (1) |
|
4.9 Grandfathering: The Hidden Risk Acceptance Practice |
|
|
237 | (9) |
|
|
238 | (1) |
|
4.9.2 Case Study 4.7: Objective Grandfathering Process Using Weighted Averages |
|
|
238 | (3) |
|
4.9.3 Case Study 4.8: Objective Grandfathering Process Using ID |
|
|
241 | (4) |
|
|
241 | (1) |
|
|
241 | (2) |
|
4.9.3.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
243 | (1) |
|
|
243 | (2) |
|
|
245 | (1) |
|
Appendix 4.I: Definitions of Network Nodal Variables |
|
|
246 | (1) |
|
Appendix 4.II: CPTs for Case Study 4.1 |
|
|
247 | (2) |
|
Appendix 4.III: CPTs for Case Study 4.2 |
|
|
249 | (4) |
|
Appendix 4.IV: CPTs for Case Study 4.3 |
|
|
253 | (2) |
|
Appendix 4.V: CPTs for Case Study 4.4 |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
Appendix 4.VI: CPTs for Case Study 4.5 |
|
|
255 | (1) |
|
Appendix 4.VII: CPTs for Case Study 4.6 |
|
|
256 | (1) |
|
Appendix 4.VIII: CPTs for Case Study 4.8 |
|
|
257 | (2) |
|
|
259 | (2) |
Chapter 5 Risk Treatment |
|
261 | (76) |
|
|
261 | (3) |
|
|
261 | (2) |
|
5.1.2 Objectives of Risk Treatment |
|
|
263 | (1) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
5.2 Phases of Risk Treatment |
|
|
264 | (3) |
|
|
264 | (1) |
|
5.2.2 Phase I: Choose Strategy |
|
|
264 | (3) |
|
5.2.2.1 Risk Transfer (or Sharing) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
5.2.2.2 Risk Mitigation (Modification) |
|
|
265 | (1) |
|
5.2.2.3 Accept/Tolerate Risk |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
5.2.2.4 Remove/Circumvent/Avoid Risk |
|
|
266 | (1) |
|
5.2.3 Phase II: Project Plans and Prioritization |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
5.2.4 Phase III: Execute Strategy |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
5.3 Need for Objective Approach when Choosing Risk Treatment Strategy |
|
|
267 | (8) |
|
|
267 | (1) |
|
|
267 | (3) |
|
5.3.3 Case Study 5.1: Simple Risk Treatment Model: Interaction between Exposure and Consequences |
|
|
270 | (4) |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
5.3.3.2 Bayesian Network Model |
|
|
270 | (1) |
|
5.3.3.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
271 | (1) |
|
|
271 | (2) |
|
5.3.3.5 Optimal Decision/Strategy for Risk Treatment |
|
|
273 | (1) |
|
5.3.4 Revisiting the CL Diagram Method |
|
|
274 | (1) |
|
5.4 Risk vs. Reliability Treatment |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
5.5 Project Prioritization Strategies |
|
|
275 | (2) |
|
|
275 | (1) |
|
5.5.2 The Dilemma of Project Prioritization |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
5.5.2.1 CapEx as a Prioritization Metric |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
5.5.2.2 Cost/Benefit as a Prioritization Metric |
|
|
276 | (1) |
|
5.5.2.3 LCC and LCA as a Prioritization Metric |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
5.5.3 The Case for Risk as Prioritization Metric |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
5.6 Risk Treatment: Multiphase Decision Process |
|
|
277 | (9) |
|
|
277 | (1) |
|
5.6.2 Case Study 5.2: Multiphase Risk Treatment Decisions for a Single Asset |
|
|
278 | (2) |
|
|
278 | (1) |
|
5.6.2.2 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
279 | (1) |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
5.6.2.4 Optimal Decisions |
|
|
280 | (1) |
|
5.6.3 Case Study 5.3: Multiphase Risk Treatment Decisions for Asset Networks |
|
|
280 | (6) |
|
|
280 | (4) |
|
|
284 | (1) |
|
5.6.3.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
5.6.3.5 Optimal Decisions |
|
|
285 | (1) |
|
5.7 Case Study 5.4: Prioritization Methods in Risk Treatment |
|
|
286 | (29) |
|
|
286 | (1) |
|
|
287 | (8) |
|
|
295 | (4) |
|
|
295 | (1) |
|
|
296 | (3) |
|
5.7.4 Probabilistic Graph Network |
|
|
299 | (13) |
|
|
299 | (1) |
|
|
299 | (2) |
|
|
301 | (2) |
|
5.7.4.4 Nodes and Their States |
|
|
303 | (1) |
|
5.7.4.5 Sources and Description of Potentials and CPTs |
|
|
304 | (1) |
|
5.7.4.6 Prior (Initial Results) |
|
|
304 | (2) |
|
5.7.4.7 Evidence (Observation) Introductions |
|
|
306 | (6) |
|
|
312 | (3) |
|
Appendix 5.I: Definitions of Network Nodal Variables |
|
|
315 | (2) |
|
Appendix 5.II: CPTs for Case Study 5.1 |
|
|
317 | (1) |
|
Appendix 5.III: CPTs for Case Study 5.2 |
|
|
318 | (2) |
|
Appendix 5.IV: CPTs for Case Study 5.3 |
|
|
320 | (2) |
|
Appendix 5.V: Marginal Probability for Decision Scenarios of Case Study 5.3 |
|
|
322 | (9) |
|
Appendix 5.VI: CPTs and Potentials for Case Study 5.4 |
|
|
331 | (3) |
|
|
334 | (3) |
Chapter 6 Risk Monitoring |
|
337 | (42) |
|
|
337 | (3) |
|
|
337 | (2) |
|
6.1.2 Objectives of Risk Monitoring |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
6.1.2.1 Monitoring Risk Components |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
6.1.2.2 Monitoring Temporal Behavior of Risk: Trending and Forecasting |
|
|
339 | (1) |
|
6.1.2.3 Other Risk Monitoring Objectives |
|
|
340 | (1) |
|
|
340 | (1) |
|
6.2 Components of Risk Monitoring |
|
|
340 | (8) |
|
|
340 | (2) |
|
6.2.2 Hazards/Demand Monitoring |
|
|
342 | (2) |
|
6.2.3 Capacity Monitoring |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
6.2.4 Exposure (Reliability) Monitoring |
|
|
344 | (1) |
|
6.2.4.1 Exposure Monitoring at Lower Limit States |
|
|
345 | (1) |
|
6.2.5 Consequences Monitoring |
|
|
345 | (3) |
|
|
345 | (3) |
|
6.2.6 Putting It All Together: Risk Monitoring |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
6.3 Case Study 6.1: Risk-Based vs. Exposure (or Reliability)-Based Monitoring |
|
|
348 | (2) |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
|
348 | (1) |
|
6.3.3 CPTs and Potentials |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
|
349 | (1) |
|
6.4 Case Study 6.2: Inference in Risk Monitoring |
|
|
350 | (4) |
|
|
350 | (1) |
|
|
351 | (1) |
|
6.4.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
351 | (2) |
|
|
353 | (1) |
|
6.5 Case Study 6.3: Forecasting Future Risk of Deterioration and Condition Ratings |
|
|
354 | (17) |
|
|
354 | (6) |
|
6.5.1.1 Sources of Deterioration |
|
|
355 | (1) |
|
6.5.1.2 Modeling Deterioration |
|
|
355 | (3) |
|
|
358 | (1) |
|
6.5.1.4 Probability Distributions |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
6.5.1.5 Reliability Index Model |
|
|
359 | (1) |
|
6.5.1.6 Concluding Remarks |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
6.5.2 CGN Process in Forecasting |
|
|
360 | (1) |
|
|
361 | (3) |
|
6.5.4 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
364 | (1) |
|
6.5.5 Prior (Initial) Marginal Probabilities (Initial Time Slice) |
|
|
365 | (1) |
|
6.5.6 Filtering (First Time Slice) |
|
|
366 | (2) |
|
6.5.7 Forecasting (Prediction) at Future Time Slice |
|
|
368 | (3) |
|
Appendix 6.I: Definitions of Network Nodal Variables |
|
|
371 | (1) |
|
Appendix 6.II: CPTs and Potentials for Case Study 6.1 |
|
|
372 | (1) |
|
Appendix 6.III: CPTs for Case Study 6.2 |
|
|
373 | (3) |
|
Appendix 6.IV: CPTs for Case Study 6.3 |
|
|
376 | (1) |
|
|
377 | (2) |
Chapter 7 Risk Communication |
|
379 | (26) |
|
|
379 | (2) |
|
7.1.1 What Is Risk Communications? |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
|
379 | (1) |
|
7.1.3 Objectives of Risk Communications |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
|
380 | (1) |
|
7.2 Issues of Importance in Communicating Risk |
|
|
381 | (2) |
|
7.2.1 Centrality of Risk Communications within Risk Management |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
7.2.2 Theories of Risk Communications |
|
|
381 | (1) |
|
7.2.3 Planning Risk Communications |
|
|
382 | (1) |
|
7.3 Sources of Risk Communications |
|
|
383 | (3) |
|
7.4 Communication Message: How to Communicate Risk |
|
|
386 | (2) |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
7.4.2 Reliability Communications vs. Risk Communication Messages |
|
|
386 | (1) |
|
7.4.3 Communication Messages with the Public |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
7.4.4 Obstacles to Efficient Communication Messages |
|
|
387 | (1) |
|
7.5 Mediums (Channels) of Communications |
|
|
388 | (2) |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
|
388 | (1) |
|
7.5.3 Statistical/Analytical Mediums |
|
|
389 | (1) |
|
7.5.4 Qualitative Mediums |
|
|
389 | (1) |
|
7.5.5 Others Communication Mediums |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
7.6 Receivers of Risk Communications |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
7.7 Case Study 7.1: Effects of Communications: Quantification of Lasswell Model |
|
|
390 | (4) |
|
|
390 | (1) |
|
|
391 | (1) |
|
7.7.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
|
392 | (1) |
|
|
393 | (1) |
|
7.8 Communicating Basic Risk Components |
|
|
394 | (4) |
|
|
394 | (1) |
|
7.8.2 Communicating Hazards |
|
|
395 | (1) |
|
|
395 | (1) |
|
7.8.2.2 Phases of Catastrophic Hazards |
|
|
396 | (1) |
|
7.8.3 Communicating Vulnerability, Capacity, Reliability, and Exposure |
|
|
396 | (1) |
|
7.8.4 Communicating Consequences |
|
|
397 | (1) |
|
7.9 Communicating Risk Management Components |
|
|
398 | (3) |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
|
398 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (1) |
|
|
399 | (2) |
|
Appendix 7.I: Definitions of Nodal Variables |
|
|
401 | (1) |
|
Appendix 7.II: CPTs for Case Study 7.1 (Objective Lasswell Model) |
|
|
401 | (2) |
|
|
403 | (2) |
Chapter 8 Risk Management Applications |
|
405 | (88) |
|
|
405 | (3) |
|
|
405 | (2) |
|
|
407 | (1) |
|
8.2 Case Study 8.1: Critical Findings Practice: Is It a Complete Risk-Management Process? |
|
|
408 | (8) |
|
|
408 | (2) |
|
8.2.1.1 Critical Findings Practice |
|
|
408 | (2) |
|
8.2.1.2 Critical Findings Process (Flagging) as a Risk Management Process |
|
|
410 | (1) |
|
|
410 | (4) |
|
8.2.2.1 ID Model of Flag Situations |
|
|
412 | (1) |
|
8.2.2.2 Utility of Different Decisions |
|
|
413 | (1) |
|
|
414 | (1) |
|
|
414 | (2) |
|
|
416 | (1) |
|
8.3 Case Study 8.2: Essentiality of Risk-Based Management for Progressive Collapse Considerations of Bridges |
|
|
416 | (10) |
|
|
416 | (1) |
|
8.3.2 Historical Overview of PCB |
|
|
417 | (1) |
|
8.3.3 Fracture Critical Condition and the Susceptibility to PC |
|
|
418 | (1) |
|
8.3.4 Bridge-Specific Generalized Definition of PC |
|
|
419 | (1) |
|
8.3.5 PC: Buildings vs. Bridges |
|
|
419 | (1) |
|
8.3.6 Assessment of PC Potential in Bridges |
|
|
419 | (2) |
|
8.3.7 Risk Management of PCB Potential |
|
|
421 | (2) |
|
|
421 | (1) |
|
8.3.7.2 Essential Components of Dealing with Potential of PCBs |
|
|
421 | (1) |
|
8.3.7.3 Risk-Based PCB Treatment |
|
|
421 | (2) |
|
8.3.8 PCB Risk Assessment Using BN |
|
|
423 | (3) |
|
|
423 | (1) |
|
|
423 | (1) |
|
8.3.8.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
423 | (1) |
|
|
424 | (1) |
|
|
425 | (1) |
|
8.4 Case Studies 8.3 and 8.4: Super Storms: Cascading Effects (CE) and Resilience (Re) |
|
|
426 | (12) |
|
|
426 | (3) |
|
8.4.2 Metrics and Methodologies of CE |
|
|
429 | (2) |
|
8.4.3 Assessment and Mitigation |
|
|
431 | (1) |
|
|
432 | (1) |
|
8.4.5 Case Study 8.3: Community Resilience and Cascading Effects |
|
|
432 | (2) |
|
|
432 | (1) |
|
8.4.5.2 Model Description |
|
|
433 | (1) |
|
8.4.5.3 CPTs and Potentials |
|
|
433 | (1) |
|
|
434 | (1) |
|
8.4.6 Case Study 8.4: Effects of Redundancy |
|
|
434 | (4) |
|
|
434 | (1) |
|
|
435 | (2) |
|
8.4.6.3 CPTs and Potentials |
|
|
437 | (1) |
|
|
437 | (1) |
|
8.5 Case Study 8.5: Risk-Based Structural Deficiency of Bridges |
|
|
438 | (7) |
|
|
438 | (1) |
|
|
439 | (2) |
|
|
439 | (2) |
|
8.5.2.2 Transfer Matrices |
|
|
441 | (1) |
|
8.5.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
441 | (1) |
|
|
441 | (4) |
|
|
445 | (1) |
|
8.6 Case Study 8.6: Risk-Based Functional Deficiency |
|
|
445 | (5) |
|
|
445 | (1) |
|
|
446 | (2) |
|
|
446 | (1) |
|
8.6.2.2 Transfer Matrices |
|
|
446 | (2) |
|
8.6.3 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
448 | (1) |
|
|
448 | (1) |
|
|
449 | (1) |
|
8.7 Case Study 8.7: Suspension Bridge Security |
|
|
450 | (15) |
|
8.7.1 Elements of Suspension Bridge Security |
|
|
450 | (2) |
|
|
450 | (1) |
|
|
451 | (1) |
|
8.7.2 Security Risk Model |
|
|
452 | (13) |
|
|
452 | (3) |
|
8.7.2.2 Conditional Probabilities Tables |
|
|
455 | (1) |
|
|
455 | (10) |
|
Appendix 8.I: Definitions of Network Nodal Variables |
|
|
465 | (2) |
|
Appendix 8.II: CPTs for Case Study 8.1 |
|
|
467 | (5) |
|
Appendix 8.III: CPTs for Case Study 8.2 |
|
|
472 | (4) |
|
Appendix 8.IV: CPTs and Potentials for Case Study 8.3 |
|
|
476 | (2) |
|
Appendix 8.V: CPTs for Case Study 8.4 |
|
|
478 | (1) |
|
Appendix 8.VI: CPTs for Case Study 8.5 |
|
|
478 | (3) |
|
Appendix 8.VII: CPTs for Case Study 8.6 |
|
|
481 | (5) |
|
Appendix 8.VIII: CPTs for Case Study 8.7 |
|
|
486 | (3) |
|
|
489 | (4) |
Appendix A: Truncated Normal Distributions |
|
493 | (2) |
Appendix B: Statistics of Histograms |
|
495 | (2) |
Index |
|
497 | |