Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Roberts & Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence 3rd Revised edition [Mīkstie vāki]

(Emeritus Professor of Civil Procedure, University of Oxford), (University of Nottingham)
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 896 pages, height x width x depth: 248x171x45 mm, weight: 1546 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Sep-2022
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0198824491
  • ISBN-13: 9780198824497
  • Mīkstie vāki
  • Cena: 89,83 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Paperback / softback, 896 pages, height x width x depth: 248x171x45 mm, weight: 1546 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 08-Sep-2022
  • Izdevniecība: Oxford University Press
  • ISBN-10: 0198824491
  • ISBN-13: 9780198824497
Criminal Evidence presents a critical commentary on the rules and principles regulating the admissibility of evidence and the processes of fact-finding in English criminal trials. The existing legal rules and their underlying values are fully contextualized and evaluated, and opportunities for reform are systematically examined.

Practical issues of inference and fact-finding are covered in detail, as are the moral and political foundations of evidentiary rules. Theoretical and doctrinal innovation in the presumption of innocence, privilege against self-incrimination, improperly obtained evidence, witness examination, hearsay, character, and the law of corroboration are considered, taking full account of the statutory reforms of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 and subsequent case law.

As a contribution to procedural scholarship, Criminal Evidence presents a distinctive vision and stakes out new territory in the law of evidence and proof. Highly engaging, stimulating and provocative, Criminal Evidence provides the ideal text for any student who wishes to gain a detailed understanding of the principles that underlie the law of criminal procedure and evidence. It also provides a valuable source of analysis and commentary for legal practitioners and scholars specializing in criminal litigation, and contributes towards a critical evaluation of recent statutory reforms and their judicial interpretation.

Recenzijas

For students studying Bar or solicitors' vocational courses, perhaps encountering the law of evidence for the first time, this is an exemplar of powerful academic writing which proves on every page how exciting, rather than intimidating, turgid and technical, this area of law really is. * Laura Hoyano, Law Society Gazette * Practitioners preparing a complex case or appeal on a point of law, or who want an intellectually stimulating refresher, will enjoy it immensely. The frequent citation of empirical research into the operation of particular evidential rules provide a grounded analysis which practitioners will often recognise. For students studying bar or solicitors vocational courses, perhaps encountering the law of evidence for the first time, this is an exemplar of powerful academic writing. It proves on every page how exciting, rather than intimidating, turgid and technical, this area of law really is. * Laura Hoyano, Law Society *

Table of Cases
xv
Table of Legislation
xiv
Table of Statutory Instruments
liii
Table of International & Comparative Materials
lv
1 Principles Of Criminal Evidence
1(47)
1.1 An Invitation to Criminal Evidence
1(8)
1.2 Criminal Procedure and Penal Justice
9(10)
1.3 Five Foundational Principles of Criminal Evidence
19(10)
1.4 Principles, Rules, and Discretion
29(6)
1.5 Sources of Criminal Evidence
35(9)
1.6 Disciplining Criminal Evidence
44(4)
2 The Procedural Framework Of Adversarial Jury Trial
48(58)
2.1 Criminal Evidence in Procedural Context
48(4)
2.2 Adversarial Traditions
52(6)
2.3 Adversarial Trial Procedure in England and Wales
58(14)
2.4 Scope and Function of the Common Law Jury
72(6)
2.5 Trial by Judge and Jury in England and Wales
78(24)
2.6 The Institutional Context of Criminal Evidence
102(4)
3 Admissible Evidence
106(32)
3.1 The Conceptual Framework of Legal Admissibility
106(3)
3.2 Relevance
109(10)
3.3 Typologies of Evidence
119(5)
3.4 Sources of Information in Criminal Litigation
124(11)
3.5 Conceptions of Evidence and Principles of Justice
135(3)
4 Fact-Finding And Proof
138(53)
4.1 Taking Facts Seriously
138(2)
4.2 Finding Facts
140(10)
4.3 A Matter of Opinion?
150(4)
4.4 Common Sense Fact-Finding
154(6)
4.5 Probability and Statistics
160(15)
4.6 Just Inferences?
175(8)
4.7 Judicial Notice
183(8)
5 Fair Trial
191(48)
5.1 Sources of Procedural Fairness
191(1)
5.2 Interpreting Section 78
191(3)
5.3 Rationales for Exclusion
194(14)
5.4 The Jurisprudence of Section 78
208(14)
5.5 Entrapment
222(12)
5.6 Fair Trial as Constitutional Principle and the Destiny of Section 78
234(5)
6 Burdens Of Proof And The Presumption Of Innocence
239(72)
6.1 Burdens and Presumptions
239(4)
6.2 Procedural Techniques of Risk-Allocation
243(17)
6.3 Philosophical Foundations of the Presumption of Innocence--the Political Morality of Woolmington
260(15)
6.4 Practical Asymmetry--From Reasonable Doubt to Being Sure
275(13)
6.5 Reversing the Onus of Proof--Before and After the Human Rights Act
288(17)
6.6 Revitalizing Woolmington by Reclaiming the Presumption of Innocence
305(6)
7 Witness Testimony And The Principle Of Orality
311(43)
7.1 The Oral Tradition and its Modern Discontents
311(11)
7.2 Testimonial Competence
322(6)
7.3 Compellability--The Principle of Compulsory Process
328(2)
7.4 Testimonial Privileges
330(11)
7.5 Public Interest Immunity
341(13)
8 Criminal Trial Procedure --Examination-In-Chief And Cross-Examination
354(40)
8.1 The Procedural Course of the Trial
354(3)
8.2 Procedural Regulation of Examination-in-Chief
357(7)
8.3 The Rule against Narrative
364(7)
8.4 Cross-Examination and Witness Credibility
371(9)
8.5 Collateral-finality
380(7)
8.6 The Incredible Vanishing Credit-Issue Distinction
387(7)
9 Hearsay
394(85)
9.1 Introduction
394(1)
9.2 Exclusionary Rationales: What's Wrong with Hearsay?
395(12)
9.3 From Rationale to Rule: Legislating Common Law Tradition
407(9)
9.4 Concept, Definition, and Scope of Hearsay Regulation
416(15)
9.5 Statutory Gateways to Hearsay Admission
431(20)
9.6 Common Law Exceptions `Preserved' by Section 118
451(17)
9.7 Back to the Future: Reconstructing a Principled Law of Hearsay
468(11)
10 Vulnerable Witnesses And The Principle Of Orality
479(48)
10.1 Identifying Testimonial Vulnerability
479(1)
10.2 `Previous Sexual History' Evidence
480(20)
10.3 Children's Evidence
500(3)
10.4 Special Measures for Vulnerable or Intimidated Witnesses (VIWs)
503(18)
10.5 Technological Transformation or the Demise of Orality?
521(6)
11 Expert Evidence
527(54)
11.1 Expert Opinion, Forensic Science, and Modern Criminal Litigation
527(5)
11.2 Beyond Expert `Opinion': Education or Deference as Epistemic Warrant?
532(6)
11.3 Qualifications, Competence, and Adversarial Bias
538(14)
11.4 Doctrinal Regulation: Admissibility and Forensic Reasoning Rules
552(12)
11.5 A Question of Reliability?
564(13)
11.6 Future-proofing Expert Evidence
577(4)
12 Confessions
581(32)
12.1 Self-incriminating Evidence
581(2)
12.2 The Law and Practice of Custodial Interrogation
583(12)
12.3 Evidentiary Regulation: the Admissibility of Confessions
595(14)
12.4 Vulnerable Suspects
609(2)
12.5 Confessions of Co-Accused
611(2)
13 The Accused's Privilege Against Self-Incrimination
613(46)
13.1 Introduction: English Common Law's Privilege
613(10)
13.2 Rationales Re-examined
623(15)
13.3 Theory into Practice: Legislative Transformations of the Privilege Against Self-incrimination
638(16)
13.4 Conclusions
654(5)
14 The Accused's Extraneous `bad Character'
659(93)
14.1 Introduction--a Reformed Character?
659(5)
14.2 Character, Proof, and Prejudice
664(14)
14.3 Scope and Structure of the CJA 2003's Bad Character Provisions
678(21)
14.4 The Four Prosecution Gateways
699(38)
14.5 Bad Character in Issue Between Accused and Co-Accused
737(9)
14.6 The Character of Criminal Evidence
746(6)
15 Corroboration And Forensic Reasoning Rules
752(34)
15.1 Comprehending `Corroboration'
752(6)
15.2 Legal Corroboration and Judicial Warnings
758(8)
15.3 Forensic Reasoning Rules
766(10)
15.4 Eyewitness Identification Evidence
776(7)
15.5 Corroboration and Fair Trials
783(3)
16 Criminal Evidence --Retrospective And Prospects
786(19)
16.1 Method and Context
786(2)
16.2 Principles of Criminal Evidence
788(4)
16.3 Current Trends
792(11)
16.4 Future Directions for Criminal Evidence
803(2)
Index 805
Paul Roberts, Professor of Criminal Jurisprudence, University of Nottingham

Adrian Zuckerman, Emeritus Professor of Civil Procedure, University of Oxford