Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Role of Fraternity in Law: A Comparative Legal Approach [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 288 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm, weight: 589 g
  • Sērija : Routledge-Giappichelli Studies in Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 06-Dec-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1032063890
  • ISBN-13: 9781032063898
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 191,26 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Bibliotēkām
  • Formāts: Hardback, 288 pages, height x width: 234x156 mm, weight: 589 g
  • Sērija : Routledge-Giappichelli Studies in Law
  • Izdošanas datums: 06-Dec-2021
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • ISBN-10: 1032063890
  • ISBN-13: 9781032063898
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
This collection discusses the concept of fraternity and examines the issue of its role in law.

Since the end of World War II, fraternity has been cited in several national constitutional charters, in addition to the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. But is there space for fraternity in law? The contributions to this book form an ideal bridge between the past and present to trace the different pathways taken to address the meaning of fraternity, and to identify its possible legal relevance. The book lays out paths that have placed fraternity in varied and challenging legal contexts in an age of globalization and conflict, where the multiplicity of national and supranational sources of law seems to show its inadequacy to govern complexity, and coexistence between diversities that appear irreconcilable. The purpose is not to recover fraternity as a forgotten principle, but to reimagine it today to address the aim and force of law within a plurality of cultures. The analysis considers a possible universal dimension that models unity within diversity, and aspires to serve as a prologue to a transition from research to dialogue between different legal systems and traditions.

The book will be of interest to academics and researchers working in the areas of Comparative Law, Legal History and Legal Philosophy.
Preface 11(4)
Fausto Goria
Introduction 15(12)
Adriana Cosseddu
I The Principle of Fraternite: From the French Constitutions of the Revolutionary Period to the Constitution of the Fifth Republic
27(22)
Fernanda Bruno
1.1 Introduction
27(3)
1.2 Historical excursus on the French Constitutions of the revolutionary period
30(4)
1.3 The French Constitutions of the second post-war period
34(2)
1.4 The debate on the legal nature of the Preamble
36(6)
1.5 Fraternite and constitutional jurisprudence
42(2)
1.6 Concluding considerations
44(5)
II Rethinking Legality in Contemporary Legal "Space": A "Bridge" between Theory and Practice
49(82)
Adriana Cosseddu
2.1 Challenges and complexities of today's law: The scope of the research
50(11)
2.2 A key to interpretation and a "privileged" observatory towards a "relational" paradigm from the Italian Constitution
61(10)
2.3 Relationships and genesis of the offense: Criminal law perspectives
71(12)
2.4 Legality as a principle and as a "value": A constitutional reading "beyond" the crisis
83(20)
2.4.1 Principles in criminal law
84(7)
2.4.2 Phenomena of criminality
91(6)
2.4.3 A constitutional perspective
97(6)
2.5 Towards a culture of legality: Needs for safeguards and scope of prevention
103(5)
2.6 Models of responsibility and the "network" of relationships: The emblematic case of economic activities
108(5)
2.7 Towards the "roots" of legality: New pathways and "spaces" of fraternity
113(18)
III Fraternity and Common Law: Liability for "Failure to Provide Aid"
131(26)
Sergio Barbaro
3.1 How does the principle of fraternity fit into Common Law? Solidarity, brotherhood and fraternity in the Anglo-American legal debate
132(3)
3.2 Fraternity and legal duty to provide aid in Common Law
135(14)
3.2.1 "The Neighbour Principle" and the duty to aid in English law
136(4)
3.2.2 The "Good Samaritan Statutes" in the U.S.A.
140(5)
3.2.3 The debate and the proposals of de iure condendo
145(4)
3.3 The Canadian model: Tradition and evolution, the example of Quebec
149(5)
3.3.1 Canadian case law on the duty of care and omission to provide aid
149(3)
3.3.2 Quebec: An isolated case of "codification" of fraternity?
152(2)
3.4 Fraternity and law: A feasible combination?
154(3)
IV From the Liberal State to the Fraternal State: Fraternity as a legal category and the contribution of Brazil's 1988 Constitution
157(20)
Carlos Augusto Alcantara Machado
4.1 Preliminary approach and research context
158(2)
4.2 Freedom, Equality and Fraternity: Evolution and consolidation of the Fundamental Human Rights
160(11)
4.2.1 Freedom Rights
160(2)
4.2.2 Equality Rights
162(1)
4.2.3 Fraternity Rights: The advent of Fraternal Constitutionalism
163(8)
4.3 Dignity of the human person as the foundation of Fraternal Constitutionalism
171(4)
4.4 From the Liberal State to the Fraternal State
175(2)
V The Creation of the Fraternity Paradigm in the Brazilian Legal System: A few comments
177(16)
Josiane Rose Petty Veronese
5.1 Introduction
178(3)
5.2 Rights and guarantees: The consolidation of democracy
181(1)
5.3 The Brazilian constitutional model and fraternity
182(4)
5.4 The Law and Fraternity Research Nucleus at the Federal University of Santa Catarina: The role of scholars
186(1)
5.5 Fraternity as a legal category
187(6)
VI Fraternity as Value-Guarantor of Sustainability: A dialogue between legal protection and the inclusion of the "other"
193(22)
Olga Maria Boschi Aguiar De Oliveira
Monica Nicknich
6.1 Introduction
194(2)
6.2 Fraternity: From oblivion to the consolidation of the Democratic State of Law in Postmodernity
196(2)
6.3 Fraternity and the misconception of its oblivion after the French Revolution
198(4)
6.4 Fraternity and its necessary rescue in Postmodernity
202(4)
6.5 Sustainability beyond the economic focus
206(5)
6.6 Fraternity as "value-guarantor" of Sustainability
211(2)
6.7 Final Considerations
213(2)
VII Fraternity and Relationships in the Law of the International Community
215(22)
Vincenzo Buonomo
7.1 Introduction
215(3)
7.2 An immediate observation: Fraternity and Human Rights
218(6)
7.3 Fraternity as a relational dimension in the International Community
224(9)
7.3.1 Fraternity and conflicts
228(2)
7.3.2 Fraternity as an expression of the global dimension
230(3)
7.4 Conclusions: Fraternity and the developments of international law
233(4)
VIII The Rationale for Relational Justice (and understanding the principle of Fraternity)
237(22)
Antonio Marquez Prieto
8.1 Beyond one-dimensional Law: The context of relational justice
237(6)
8.2 Reciprocity as the central dimension, and sociality as the context
243(8)
8.3 The relational principle of fraternity as the key to relational justice
251(8)
IX The Relational Justice of Contract
259(22)
Rocio Caro Gandara
9.1 Introduction
259(4)
9.2 The failure of "classical" contract law
263(4)
9.3 The relational approach to contract
267(4)
9.4 The relational approach to justice
271(2)
9.5 Towards a new (?) paradigm of contractual justice
273(8)
Index 281
Adriana Cosseddu is Professor of Criminal Law at the University of Sassari, Italy, and Director of Communion and Law international network of legal professionals.