Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

E-grāmata: Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior

Edited by (University of South Carolina, USA.), Edited by (Georgia State University, USA)
  • Formāts: 542 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-Oct-2017
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781317430384
  • Formāts - PDF+DRM
  • Cena: 57,60 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Šī e-grāmata paredzēta tikai personīgai lietošanai. E-grāmatas nav iespējams atgriezt un nauda par iegādātajām e-grāmatām netiek atmaksāta.
  • Formāts: 542 pages
  • Izdošanas datums: 02-Oct-2017
  • Izdevniecība: Routledge
  • Valoda: eng
  • ISBN-13: 9781317430384

DRM restrictions

  • Kopēšana (kopēt/ievietot):

    nav atļauts

  • Drukāšana:

    nav atļauts

  • Lietošana:

    Digitālo tiesību pārvaldība (Digital Rights Management (DRM))
    Izdevējs ir piegādājis šo grāmatu šifrētā veidā, kas nozīmē, ka jums ir jāinstalē bezmaksas programmatūra, lai to atbloķētu un lasītu. Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu, jums ir jāizveido Adobe ID. Vairāk informācijas šeit. E-grāmatu var lasīt un lejupielādēt līdz 6 ierīcēm (vienam lietotājam ar vienu un to pašu Adobe ID).

    Nepieciešamā programmatūra
    Lai lasītu šo e-grāmatu mobilajā ierīcē (tālrunī vai planšetdatorā), jums būs jāinstalē šī bezmaksas lietotne: PocketBook Reader (iOS / Android)

    Lai lejupielādētu un lasītu šo e-grāmatu datorā vai Mac datorā, jums ir nepieciešamid Adobe Digital Editions (šī ir bezmaksas lietotne, kas īpaši izstrādāta e-grāmatām. Tā nav tas pats, kas Adobe Reader, kas, iespējams, jau ir jūsu datorā.)

    Jūs nevarat lasīt šo e-grāmatu, izmantojot Amazon Kindle.

Interest in social science and empirical analyses of law, courts and specifically the politics of judges has never been higher or more salient. Consequently, there is a strong need for theoretical work on the research that focuses on courts, judges and the judicial process. The Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior provides the most up to date examination of scholarship across the entire spectrum of judicial politics and behavior, written by a combination of currently prominent scholars and the emergent next generation of researchers. Unlike almost all other volumes, this Handbook examines judicial behavior from both an American and Comparative perspective.











Part 1 provides a broad overview of the dominant Theoretical and Methodological perspectives used to examine and understand judicial behavior, Part 2 offers an in-depth analysis of the various current scholarly areas examining the U.S. Supreme Court, Part 3 moves from the Supreme Court to examining other U.S. federal and state courts, and Part 4 presents a comprehensive overview of Comparative Judicial Politics and Transnational Courts.

Each author in this volume provides perspectives on the most current methodological and substantive approaches in their respective areas, along with suggestions for future research. The chapters contained within will generate additional scholarly and public interest by focusing on topics most salient to the academic, legal and policy communities.

Recenzijas

'In this edited volume, Professors Howard and Randazzo have produced an impressively comprehensive compilation of essays and analyses from many of the most insightful and productive scholars in the field of judicial politics. Among the volumes major contributions is its section on comparative and international courts, an area of growing importance and impact in the study of law and courts. The editors meta-analytic essays bind the chapters together with key observations about current and future research to help students, scholars and citizens understand and evaluate institutional and behavioral dimensions to the rule of law.' - Stefanie A. Lindquist, Foundation Professor of Law and Political Science, Arizona State University

'This volume is a tour de force of the best of judicial politics. Howard and Randazzo compiled essays written by a veritable whos who of judicial politics. The breadth of topics reflects the range of subjects examined by judicial scholars from the Supreme Court and other American courts to comparative and transnational courts. This book promises to become one of the standard reviews of judicial behavior, offering a master class on the competing theoretical accounts, methodological issues, and classic empirical puzzles.' - Paul Wahlbeck, Professor of Political Science, George Washington University

'Bob Howard and Kirk Randazzo have put together a comprehensive collection review essays in nearly every significant topic related to judicial decision-making, written by the most accomplished experts in the field. This volume is well-suited for a graduate course in judicial politics, because each chapter provides a sophisticated entrée into a particular subject, but could also be appropriate for advanced undergraduates.' - Joseph L. Smith, Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Political Science,

List of Figures
x
List of Tables
xii
List of Contributors
xiv
Acknowledgments xxiii
Introduction: Understanding Judicial Behavior---A Work in Progress 1(14)
Robert M. Howard
Kirk A. Randazzo
PART 1 Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives
15(80)
1 The Attitudinal Model
17(17)
Jeffrey A. Segal
Alan J. Champlin
2 Law and Politics in Judicial and Supreme Court Decision Making
34(14)
J. Mitchell Pickerill
Christopher Brough
3 Strategic Accounts of Judging
48(14)
Lee Epstein
Jack Knight
4 Measuring Ideology on the Courts
62(22)
Michael A. Bailey
5 Measuring Law
84(11)
Tom S. Clark
PART 2 The U.S. Supreme Court
95(144)
6 Historical Development of Supreme Court Research
97(17)
Christopher N. Krewson
Ryan J. Owens
7 Law and Policy in Decision Making
114(18)
Lawrence Baum
8 U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy: Unanswered Questions and an Agenda for Future Research
132(19)
Michael J. Nelson
James L. Gibson
9 The Selection of U.S. Supreme Court Justices
151(15)
James ben-Aaron
Paul M. Collins, Jr.
Lori A. Ringhand
10 Opinion Writing in the U.S. Supreme Court
166(14)
Pamela C. Corley
Artemus Ward
11 Making Sense of the Supreme Court---Public Opinion Relationship
180(16)
Peter K. Enns
Patrick C. Wohlfarth
12 Of Political Principals and Legal Principles: The Solicitor General of the United States
196(25)
Richard L. Pacelle, Jr.
13 Oral Arguments
221(18)
Timothy R. Johnson
Thomas K. Pryor
PART 3 Other U.S. Courts
239(114)
14 The Courts of Appeals
241(18)
Susan Haire
Reginald S. Sheehan
Ali S. Masood
15 U.S. District Courts
259(21)
Christina L. Boyd
Ethan D. Boldt
16 What Is So Special About Specialized Courts in the United States?
280(21)
Isaac Unah
Ryan Williams
17 Decision Making in State Supreme Courts
301(20)
Melinda Gann Hall
18 Lower Federal Court Confirmations: Motivations and Strategies
321(19)
Amy Steigerwalt
Wendy L. Martinek
19 Judicial Selection in the States: A Look Back, A Look Ahead
340(13)
Chris W. Bonneau
Heather Marie Rice
PART 4 Comparative Judicial Politics and Transnational Courts
353(156)
20 Judicial Independence Research Beyond the Crossroads
355(15)
Jeffrey Kaplan Staton
21 Strategic Behavior of Comparative Courts
370(19)
Brad Epperly
Monica Lineberger
22 Courts in Developed Countries
389(17)
Michael C. Tolley
23 Courts and Decision Making in Developing Democracies
406(21)
Lee Demetrius Walker
24 Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes
427(18)
Tamir Moustafa
25 The International Court of Justice
445(22)
Sara McLaughlin Mitchell
Andrew P. Owsiak
26 The European Court of Justice
467(24)
Jay N. Krehhiel
Matthew J. Gabel
Clifford J. Carrubba
27 Turning to Regional Courts: The Inter-American Court of Human Rights
491(18)
Rebecca Reid
Conclusion: Where Do We Go From Here? 509(5)
Robert M. Howard
Kirk A. Randazzo
Index 514
Robert M. Howard is professor of political science at Georgia State University. His main research interests are the impact of courts and litigation on social and public policy, and judicial decision making by the federal courts. He is the author of numerous articles and books, including Judging Law and Policy: Courts and Policymaking in the American Political System and Getting a Poor Return: Courts, Justice and Taxes. Dr. Howard has been the editor of the Justice System Journal as well as the editor of the book series Law, Courts, and Politics.

Kirk A. Randazzo is professor of political science at the University of South Carolina. His research focuses on judicial behavior in the United States under a variety of potential constraints and the effects of judicial independence for emerging democracies. His work has been published in several prestigious journals, including the American Journal of Political Science, the Journal of Politics, and Political Research Quarterly. Additionally, he has published three books, the latest of which is Checking the Courts: Law, Ideology, and Contingent Discretion (co-authored with Richard W. Waterman), published in 2014 by SUNY Press.