Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Science Makes the World Go Round: Successful Scientific Knowledge Transfer for the Environment 2016 ed. [Hardback]

,
  • Formāts: Hardback, 207 pages, height x width: 235x155 mm, weight: 5089 g, 44 Illustrations, black and white; XIX, 207 p. 44 illus., 1 Hardback
  • Izdošanas datums: 28-Jun-2016
  • Izdevniecība: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 3319340778
  • ISBN-13: 9783319340777
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 91,53 €*
  • * ši ir gala cena, t.i., netiek piemērotas nekādas papildus atlaides
  • Standarta cena: 107,69 €
  • Ietaupiet 15%
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
Science Makes the World Go Round: Successful Scientific Knowledge Transfer for the Environment 2016 ed.Palielināt
  • Formāts: Hardback, 207 pages, height x width: 235x155 mm, weight: 5089 g, 44 Illustrations, black and white; XIX, 207 p. 44 illus., 1 Hardback
  • Izdošanas datums: 28-Jun-2016
  • Izdevniecība: Springer International Publishing AG
  • ISBN-10: 3319340778
  • ISBN-13: 9783319340777
Citas grāmatas par šo tēmu:
Permanent link: https://www.kriso.lv/db/9783319340777.html
Keywords:
Researchers in the environmental sciences are often frustrated because actors involved with practice do not follow their advice. This is the starting point of this book, which describes a new model for scientific knowledge transfer called RIU, for Research, Integration and Utilization. This model sees the factors needed for knowledge transfer as being state-of-the-art research and the effective, practical utilization to which it leads, and it highlights the importance of "integration", which in this context means the active bi-directional selection of those research results that are relevant for practice. In addition, the model underscores the importance of special allies who are powerful actors that support the application of scientific research results in society. An important product of this approach is a checklist of factors for successful knowledge transfer that will be useful for scientists. By using this checklist, research projects and research programs can be optimised wi

th regard to their potential for reaching successful knowledge transfer effects.

1. Making science work in policy and politics.- 2. The RIU model as analytical framework for scientific knowledge transfer.- 3. Case studies.- 4. Theoretical foundations of RIU.- 5. Outlook - further potential applications of the RIU model.- List of tables and figures.
1 Making Science Work in Policy and Politics
1(28)
1.1 Joint Solving of Problems by Policy and Science
1(1)
1.2 Sharing a Beer with a Politician
2(1)
1.3 Focus on Individual Strengths
3(10)
1.3.1 Different Focus of Scientists and Political Actors
3(2)
1.3.2 Asking Different Questions
5(1)
1.3.3 Collecting Different Data
6(1)
1.3.4 Different Time Frames
7(1)
1.3.5 Revertible Versus Convincing Answers
8(1)
1.3.6 Accumulating Knowledge or Labelling Knowledge Anew
9(1)
1.3.7 The Power of Wishful Thinking
10(1)
1.3.8 Difference Between Logic and Agreement
11(1)
1.3.9 Power for Describing and for Changing the World
12(1)
1.4 Scientific and Political Principles for Bridging the Difference
13(10)
1.4.1 RIU 1: Building Trust in Encounters
14(1)
1.4.2 RIU 2: Exchanging a Maximum of Information
15(2)
1.4.3 RIU 3: Accepting Limits in Mutual Understanding
17(2)
1.4.4 RIU 4: Looking for Internal and External Allies of Science
19(4)
1.5 Professional Organisation of Knowledge Transfer
23(1)
1.6 Components of the RIU Model
24(1)
1.7 Effect of the RIU Model
25(4)
References
26(3)
2 The RIU Model as an Analytical Framework for Scientific Knowledge Transfer
29(26)
2.1 Introduction to the RIU Model
29(3)
2.2 Scientific Knowledge Transfer and Its Subtasks: Research, Integration, and Utilization
32(3)
2.2.1 Research
33(1)
2.2.2 Integration
33(1)
2.2.3 Utilization
34(1)
2.3 The Production Lines
35(1)
2.4 Allies for a Successful Transfer of Knowledge
36(2)
2.4.1 Transfer Through Internal Allies
36(1)
2.4.2 Transfer Through External Allies
36(1)
2.4.3 Transfer Through Learning Allies
37(1)
2.4.4 Transfer Through Wise Allies
37(1)
2.5 Transfer Through Integrators
38(1)
2.6 Bricks of Successful Scientific Knowledge Transfer in the RIU Model
39(10)
2.6.1 High Quality Scientific Research
39(3)
2.6.2 Pluralistic Foresighted Integration
42(5)
2.6.3 Democratic Utilization
47(2)
2.7 Checklist for Successful Scientific Knowledge Transfer
49(3)
2.8 Conclusion: The RIU Model as an Analytical Framework for Successful Scientific Knowledge Transfer
52(3)
References
53(2)
3 Case Studies
55(98)
3.1 Background and Methodology of the Case Studies in Austria
55(6)
3.1.1 The Background: Austrian Sustainability Research Programmes
55(4)
3.1.2 Methodology
59(2)
3.2 Hand in Hand---Life 2014 in the Pinzgau Region---Common Regional Development Cooperation Instead of Parish-Pump Politics
61(14)
3.2.1 Project Fact Sheet
61(1)
3.2.2 From Parish-Pump Politics to Regional Cooperation
62(1)
3.2.3 The Project: Life 2014
62(1)
3.2.4 Finding Topics for Regional Development
63(1)
3.2.5 Main Effect on the Regional Association: From "Paper Tiger" to an Active Regional Actor
64(2)
3.2.6 Active "Regionalverband" for Real Cooperation
66(2)
3.2.7 Factors for the Success of Knowledge Transfer
68(6)
3.2.8 Knowledge Transfer Success Factor List
74(1)
3.3 Ski Tourism Within Climate Change---The STRATEGE Project
75(13)
3.3.1 Project Fact Sheet
75(1)
3.3.2 Winter Sports and Climate Change: The STRATEGE Project at Schladming
76(1)
3.3.3 Content of the STRATEGE Project
77(3)
3.3.4 Main Impact: Science-Based Options for Regional Adaptation to Climate Change Instead of Panic
80(3)
3.3.5 Factors for the Success of Knowledge Transfer
83(4)
3.3.6 Knowledge Transfer Success Factor List
87(1)
3.4 Indicators for Human Impact on the Biosphere and Sustainable Development
88(13)
3.4.1 Project Fact Sheet
88(1)
3.4.2 Information About Human Impact on the Environment
89(1)
3.4.3 Political Drivers for Measuring Human Impact
90(1)
3.4.4 Project in Causative Indicators and Colonisation of Nature
91(4)
3.4.5 Impact on Improved National and International Public Statistics
95(1)
3.4.6 Factors for the Success of Knowledge Transfer
96(4)
3.4.7 Knowledge Transfer Success Factor List
100(1)
3.5 Options for Viennese Agriculture and Horticulture
101(18)
3.5.1 Project Fact Sheet
101(1)
3.5.2 Starting Point: Insufficient Knowledge About the Significance and the Lack of Strategy of Agriculture in Vienna
102(1)
3.5.3 The Project: Options for Viennese Agriculture
103(3)
3.5.4 Emphasis: Framework Conditions
106(1)
3.5.5 Emphasis: Production Alternatives
107(1)
3.5.6 Emphasis: Marketing Alternatives
108(1)
3.5.7 Emphasis: Landscape and Local Recreation
108(1)
3.5.8 Emphasis: Education, Art and Entertainment
109(1)
3.5.9 The Principal Effect: Enhancement of Viennese Agriculture Through Integration into Urban Development
109(1)
3.5.10 Goals of AgSTEP
110(3)
3.5.11 Factors for the Success of Knowledge Transfer
113(5)
3.5.12 Knowledge Transfer Success Factor List
118(1)
3.6 Establishing a Legal Basis: Implementing the EU Water Framework Directive in Austria
119(13)
3.6.1 Project Fact Sheet
119(1)
3.6.2 Background: The EU Water Framework Directive
120(2)
3.6.3 Implementation of the European Water Framework Directive in Austria
122(2)
3.6.4 The Scientific Project
124(2)
3.6.5 The Effects
126(1)
3.6.6 Factors for the Success of Knowledge Transfer
127(4)
3.6.7 Knowledge Transfer Success Factor List
131(1)
3.7 Research in the Neusiedler See---Seewinkel National Park Region
132(21)
3.7.1 Project Fact Sheet
132(1)
3.7.2 Dock Research onto Long-Existing Processes!
133(2)
3.7.3 The Neusiedler See---Seewinkel Region
135(1)
3.7.4 Research Focus of the National Park
135(5)
3.7.5 The Effects
140(1)
3.7.6 Factors for the Success of Knowledge Transfer
140(6)
3.7.7 Knowledge Transfer Success Factor List
146(1)
References
147(6)
4 Theoretical Foundations of RIU
153(20)
4.1 Towards a Political Science Explanation of Scientific Knowledge Transfer
153(1)
4.2 Linear or Technocratic Models
154(2)
4.3 Different System Models
156(1)
4.4 Functional Models
157(2)
4.5 Co-production and Communication Models
159(2)
4.6 The RIU Model
161(12)
4.6.1 Multiple Power Relations Supporting Multiple Science-Based Solutions
163(1)
4.6.2 "Science Plus Power": Four Powerful Allies for Science in the RIU Model
164(1)
4.6.3 Internal Allies
165(1)
4.6.4 External Allies
165(1)
4.6.5 Learning Allies
166(1)
4.6.6 Wise Allies
166(1)
4.6.7 Power for Scientific Knowledge Transfer Against Democratic Rules?
167(1)
References
168(5)
5 Outlook---Further Potential Applications of the RIU Model
173
5.1 From Analyzing to Improving Scientific Knowledge Transfer
173(4)
5.1.1 Independent High Quality Scientific Research
173(1)
5.1.2 Professional, Transparent and Pluralistic Integration
174(2)
5.1.3 Binding, Responsible and Democratic Political Decisions
176(1)
5.1.4 Some Brief Cases Seen Through the Lens of the RIU Model
177(1)
15.2 Better Division of Tasks for a Scientifically Sound, Pluralistic and Democratic Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
177(4)
5.3 Optimising the Potential of Science and Politics for an Effective and Efficient German Advisory Council on the Environment
181(4)
5.4 Optimizing a Realistic Phronetic Social Science
185(3)
5.5 Quality Management for the Network of the European Forest Institute (EFI)
188(5)
5.6 Quality Assurance of the German Federal Agency for the Environment (UBA)
193(5)
5.7 Diversifying Responsibility for "Responsible Research and Innovation"
198(4)
5.8 Effective Science-Public Communication
202
References
205
Dr. Michael Böcher is senior researcher in the Forest and Nature Conservation Policy Group at the University of Göttingen. His research interests are environmental policy analysis, regional governance, and scientific knowledge transfer for sustainability. mboeche@gwgd.de





Professor Max Krott holds the Chair of Forest and Nature Conservation Policy at the University of Göttingen. He has extensive experience in the analysis, support and management of environmental research, topics he has investigated for 25 years. mkrott@gwdg.de