Atjaunināt sīkdatņu piekrišanu

Second Mona Lisa?: Challenges of Attribution and Authentication and Various Possibilities for Evaluating a Work of Art [Hardback]

  • Formāts: Hardback, 146 pages, height x width x depth: 290x221x15 mm, weight: 957 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 01-Feb-2021
  • Izdevniecība: L'Erma Di Bretschneider
  • ISBN-10: 8891321540
  • ISBN-13: 9788891321541
  • Hardback
  • Cena: 192,96 €
  • Grāmatu piegādes laiks ir 3-4 nedēļas, ja grāmata ir uz vietas izdevniecības noliktavā. Ja izdevējam nepieciešams publicēt jaunu tirāžu, grāmatas piegāde var aizkavēties.
  • Daudzums:
  • Ielikt grozā
  • Piegādes laiks - 4-6 nedēļas
  • Pievienot vēlmju sarakstam
  • Formāts: Hardback, 146 pages, height x width x depth: 290x221x15 mm, weight: 957 g
  • Izdošanas datums: 01-Feb-2021
  • Izdevniecība: L'Erma Di Bretschneider
  • ISBN-10: 8891321540
  • ISBN-13: 9788891321541
The topic of attribution and authentication of art works is a well-known one and is currently the subject of heated debate. To arrive at a univocal scientific truth, however, it is necessary to integrate historical-humanistic and technical-experimental skills with a subjective and objective evaluation. The first part of the volume deals with experimentation relating to three valuable artifacts of different material composition: a painting, a sculpture, a codex. The second part of the research regards the emblematic case of the Mona Lisa and its uniqueness. The question connected to this study is: "Is there a second Mona Lisa?" Is the Isleworth Mona Lisa, also known as the Earlier Mona Lisa, a second version of the Louvre Mona Lisa painted by the Renaissance genius Leonardo da Vinci? In order to provide an answer regarding attribution, a methodological path was applied to the painting on canvas "Mona Lisa with columns" (St. Petersburg), establishing that it was a copy, albeit a well-executed one. Numerous versions and copies of the Mona Lisa were also studied, basing their examination on the in-depth archival-bibliographic research of the many paintings on the same subject. The findings highlighted the distinction between two authentic versions by Leonardo, i.e. the Louvre Mona Lisa and the Isleworth Mona Lisa and two copies, i.e. the Prado and the Reynolds Mona Lisas. The latter two, considered to be the most complete and qualitatively better that many others are, in fact, either copies of previous Mona Lisas or of the two authentic versions. The final considerations are dedicated to the chronological sequence of historical sources, stylistic and aesthetic analyses, artistic techniques and experimental investigations to prove the authentication of the Isleworth Mona Lisa by Leonardo.
Preface 9(4)
Part One Attribution and authentication of art works
1 Art forgery
13(8)
1.1 Forgery in the art market
13(4)
1.2 Legislation
17(1)
1.3 How to recognize a forgery
18(3)
2 Attribution and authentication
21(28)
2.1 The challenges of art attribution
21(3)
2.2 Different degrees of certainty in the attribution of art works
24(2)
2.3 Some case studies relating to artefacts of historical-artistic, sculptural and manuscript interest
26(23)
2.3.1 Madonna with child and devotee (painting)
26(5)
2.3.2 Madonna with child (sculpture)
31(5)
2.3.3 Dante Codex (manuscript)
36(13)
Part Two Copies and versions of the Mona Lisa (Gioconda)
3 Analytical-diagnostic study of the painting Mona Lisa with columns
49(24)
3.1 Introduction
49(2)
3.2 Macroscopic examination
51(2)
3.3 Evaluation of the conservation state and identification of previous conservation interventions
53(2)
3.4 Scientific investigations
55(14)
3.4.1 Textile support
55(4)
3.4.2 Preparatory layer (ground)
59(3)
3.4.3 Imprimatura
62(2)
3.4.4 Paint layer
64(5)
3.5 Considerations
69(4)
4 A comparison of the copies and versions
73(34)
4.1 Introduction
73(1)
4.2 Selected Mona Lisas: Prado, Reynolds, Isleworth (or Earlier Mona Lisa) p.
73(16)
A The Prado Mona Lisa
75(6)
B The Reynolds Mona Lisa
81(3)
C The Isleworth Mona Lisa (or Earlier Mona Lisa)
84(5)
4.3 Comparative analyses of the Isleworth and Louvre versions
89(8)
4.3.1 Findings
90(1)
4.3.2 A comparison of the columns and the embroidery of the dresses
91(5)
4.3.3 Considerations
96(1)
4.4 Conclusions
97(10)
References
101(6)
Papers
Jean-Pierre Isbouts
John Asmus
Vadim Parfenov
5 Why did Leonardo paint the Mona Lisa?
107(20)
Jean-Pierre Isbouts
1 Introduction
107(4)
2 Leonardo Returns to Florence
111(1)
3 Leonardo in Florence
112(3)
4 Francesco del Giocondo
115(1)
5 The Mystery of the Mona Lisa Commission
116(4)
6 Vasari Sees the Mona Lisa
120(1)
7 Who Commissioned the Louvre Mona Lisa?
120(1)
8 The Giuliano Commission Theory
121(2)
9 Leonardo's Anatomical Studies
123(4)
References
125(2)
6 Comparative analysis of Mona Lisa portraits by means of image processing
127(12)
John Asmus
Vadim Parfenov
1 Introduction
127(1)
2 Method
128(1)
3 Comparative analysis of Mona Lisa portraits
129(5)
4 Conclusion
134(5)
References
135(4)
Appendlx: Why and whether a reproduced work of art should be vetted rather than vetoed
139(4)
Salvatore Lorusso
1 Cultural identity
139(1)
2 Authentic and reproduced, discoverer and modern inventor
140(1)
3 On the possibility of judging a reproduced work of art as being legitimate
140(3)
Biographical notes 143